USAspending in North Dakota At-Large, FY2024

At-large means the state’s one House district

North Dakota does not subdivide into multiple congressional districts. USAspending records that as district 00. Federal awards whose place of performance is in North Dakota and that map to the at-large seat appear here. In FY2024 those awards summed to $102.3 billion in obligations across 51,705 records.

Because the code covers the whole state, this district hub is closer to a statewide place-of-performance file than a slice of a multi-district state. It still is not identical to every North Dakota row in USAspending: awards that fail to map can sit in a 90-coded unspecified bucket if the source file uses one.

Fifty-one thousand seven hundred five awards

The 51,705 count is high for a small-population state, which usually means many assistance and contract actions rather than 51,705 unique vendors. The packet has no unique-recipient figure. Those records still add to a defined obligation total: $102.3 billion in FY2024.

First year and last year are both 2024. The award count is a single-fiscal-year stock. It is not a lifetime count of every federal action ever performed in North Dakota.

Statewide performance, not a Bismarck headquarters list

Place of performance, not headquarters, assigns ND-00. A vendor based in another state can appear in the $102.3 billion if USAspending codes the work to North Dakota’s at-large district. A North Dakota–headquartered firm can be missing if the work was performed in another state.

At-large geography makes the HQ mix-up tempting: people assume “North Dakota company” equals “North Dakota district.” The dataset does not work that way. Recipient views answer who won. This page answers where the work was coded.

Obligations for FY2024

SpendingVault’s district total is USAspending obligations. An obligation is a legal commitment; an outlay is a payment. The $102.3 billion figure is the commitment sum for ND-00 place of performance in FY2024. Cash can follow later.

Do not describe the total as money “sent to North Dakota” in a single check. Federal agencies obligated $102.3 billion on 51,705 awards whose performance location is the at-large district code. A firm based in another state still counts toward $102.3 billion if performance is coded ND-00.

North Dakota state page and the district index

The North Dakota at-large hub is this district table. The North Dakota state page is the statewide rollup and may include residual codes if they exist. The all-districts index lists other at-large states and the 90/98 unspecified buckets used elsewhere in USAspending. At-large is a real House geography, unlike codes 90 and 98.

At-large North Dakota versus a 90-coded residual

District 00 is the at-large House seat, so this hub is close to a statewide place-of-performance file. It is still not identical to every North Dakota row if a 90-coded residual exists in the index. The $102.3 billion and 51,705 awards are the ND-00 tag only.

Fifty-one thousand seven hundred five records is a thick file for a small-population state. Thickness here usually means many assistance and contract actions. It does not mean 51,705 unique North Dakota companies. The North Dakota at-large hub is the table; the North Dakota state page is the jurisdiction rollup. The all-districts index lists other at-large states and unspecified 90/98 buckets. Report $102.3 billion as FY2024 USAspending obligations with North Dakota at-large place of performance. That is a commitment total, not cash paid statewide in FY2024. Cite North Dakota at-large as $102.3 billion in FY2024 USAspending obligations on 51,705 awards with district code 00. Code 00 is the statewide House seat, not a 90 or 98 unspecified bucket. The thick file of 51,705 records is a single-year action count, not 51,705 unique companies. Because at-large covers the state, this hub is close to a statewide place-of-performance file. It is still only the ND-00 tag. A 90-coded residual, if present, would be separate. The North Dakota state page is the jurisdiction rollup. The all-districts index lists other at-large states. A vendor based outside North Dakota still counts toward $102.3 billion if performance is coded ND-00. A North Dakota headquarters without that tag does not. Obligations are not outlays. First year and last year are both 2024. USAspending.gov is the source.

Questions

How much federal spending is in North Dakota’s at-large district for FY2024?

USAspending.gov records $102.3 billion in FY2024 obligations with a North Dakota at-large (district 00) place of performance, on 51,705 awards. These are obligations, not outlays. District is performance location, not headquarters. The facts cover FY2024 only. District 00 is the at-large House seat for North Dakota, so the $102.3 billion FY2024 obligation total on 51,705 awards is statewide place of performance, not an unspecified 90/98 bucket.

What does district 00 mean for North Dakota?

Code 00 is the at-large House district: North Dakota elects one representative statewide. It is not USAspending’s unspecified 90 or 98 bucket. The $102.3 billion total is mapped to that statewide district code for place of performance. District 00 is the at-large House seat for North Dakota, so the $102.3 billion FY2024 obligation total on 51,705 awards is statewide place of performance, not an unspecified 90/98 bucket.

Why are there 51,705 awards?

That is the FY2024 award-record count for ND-00 place of performance. It is not a unique-vendor count. Those records sum to $102.3 billion in obligations. The packet does not break the file by agency or award type. Award count and dollars are separate packet facts: 51,705 FY2024 records still sum to $102.3 billion in obligations, and this page does not list unique vendors or the largest individual awards.

If a company is based in North Dakota, is it in this total?

Only if place of performance is coded ND-00. A North Dakota headquarters is not sufficient. Work performed in another state will not enter the $102.3 billion and 51,705-award totals. Only the place-of-performance code puts an award in this $102.3 billion FY2024 rollup; a North Dakota office address is neither required nor enough to enter the 51,705 records.