Skip to main content
← All guides

FY2024 USAspending in New Hampshire’s district 90 bucket

USAspending.gov records $9.7 billion in FY2024 federal obligations with place of performance coded New Hampshire district 90. The exact sum is $9,742,800,948.79. District 90 is an unspecified or non-voting bucket, not New Hampshire’s 90th House seat. 2,534 awards share the NH-90 tag. SpendingVault indexes those rows on the New Hampshire District 90 hub.

Key figures

  • New Hampshire district 90 is a USAspending unspecified/non-voting bucket, not a House seat.
  • FY2024 place-of-performance obligations in that bucket total $9.7 billion.
  • 2,534 awards are counted for NH-90 in FY2024.
  • Geography remains place of performance, not recipient HQ.
  • Cite $9.7 billion as obligations, not outlays.

NH-90 is a leftover code, not a constituency

New Hampshire elects two voting members of the House. It does not elect a 90th district. USAspending.gov uses codes 90 and 98 for place-of-performance rows that are unspecified or non-voting. The $9.7 billion FY2024 total on this page is the residual New Hampshire bin for performance that was not mapped to NH-01 or NH-02. 2,534 awards sit in that leftover tag rather than on the numbered map.

Treat NH-90 as a coding bin. Dollars here are still award obligations from USAspending.gov. They are simply not assigned to a voting House district in the place-of-performance field. The year window is FY2024 only. First year and last year are both 2024. A calendar-year overlay would be a different cut.

What $9.7 billion measures in the unspecified bin

The $9.7 billion figure is the FY2024 obligation sum for rows tagged NH-90. An obligation is a commitment on an award record, not a Treasury outlay and not New Hampshire’s state budget. SpendingVault does not convert $9,742,800,948.79 into cash paid. A New Hampshire headquarters does not, by itself, place a row in NH-90. The 2,534 records follow unspecified place of performance.

Compared with many numbered districts, 2,534 awards is a thin file beside $9.7 billion. The packet does not say those rows are a handful of large contracts. It also does not publish unique recipients. Keep the dollar total and the row count as independent facts. Do not divide $9.7 billion by 2,534.

Place of performance still governs the leftover bin

Even in the 90 bucket, geography is place of performance, not recipient headquarters. A contractor based in New Hampshire, another state, or another country can appear here if the performance district was left unspecified or coded 90 for New Hampshire.

Mapped New Hampshire districts are separate pages. NH-90 is the leftover bin, not a statewide total. The New Hampshire state hub is the place to see the state roll-up that includes numbered seats plus this bucket. 2,534 rows can include modifications. The packet does not explain why each unmapped New Hampshire row lacked NH-01 or NH-02.

2,534 awards in a high-dollar unspecified extract

2,534 is the FY2024 record count for NH-90 place of performance. Modifications can each add a row. The packet does not identify unique recipients or an agency mix. A relatively small row count next to $9.7 billion is a citation detail, not a ranking against other states’ 90 buckets.

Cite NH-90 as a 90/98-style bucket: FY2024 obligations of $9.7 billion on 2,534 awards. Do not call it a congressional district. Do not treat the exact $9,742,800,948.79 as outlays.

Obligations, outlays, and related New Hampshire pages

Cite $9.7 billion as obligations. Outlays are a different series and can lag. A headline that calls district 90 “New Hampshire’s 90th district spending” misreads the USAspending code. District 98 is the companion non-voting code on the same coding scheme.

The all-districts index lists mapped seats and other 90/98 buckets in the same format. Compare NH-90 only on FY2024 obligations and only as an unspecified bucket, not as a voting district. Mapped New Hampshire districts and the New Hampshire state hub are other pages. This packet does not publish their totals.

How to quote New Hampshire district 90

The $9.7 billion FY2024 obligation figure for NH-90 is USAspending.gov award money that was not mapped to a numbered voting district. SpendingVault does not treat 2,534 awards as a constituency and does not convert the bucket into outlays.

Open numbered New Hampshire hubs for a House-seat map. Open the New Hampshire state page for a statewide roll-up. NH-90 answers the unspecified-bin question only, still on FY2024 obligations. Reuse $9,742,800,948.79 with 2,534 awards, FY2024, obligations, and the unspecified-bucket label. Later USAspending.gov corrections can revise both the dollar sum and the award count.

Questions

Does New Hampshire have a 90th congressional district?
No. USAspending.gov uses district 90 as an unspecified or non-voting place-of-performance bucket. The $9.7 billion FY2024 total on this page is that residual New Hampshire bin, not a House seat. District 98 is the companion non-voting code. 2,534 awards share the NH-90 tag in FY2024.
How much is in New Hampshire’s district 90 bucket?
USAspending.gov shows $9.7 billion in FY2024 obligations coded to New Hampshire district 90. The exact sum is $9,742,800,948.79. That is an obligation total, not outlays, and not New Hampshire’s state budget. The extract counts 2,534 awards for NH-90 in FY2024. First year and last year are both 2024.
Is NH-90 based on recipient headquarters?
No. The field is still place of performance. Rows land in district 90 when USAspending does not map performance to a numbered voting district. Headquarters can sit in New Hampshire or elsewhere. Mapped New Hampshire seats remain on their own hubs. Cite NH-90 as an unspecified or non-voting USAspending bucket of FY2024 obligations.
Are the $9.7 billion in NH-90 already paid out?
No. $9.7 billion is an obligation aggregate from FY2024 award records. Outlays are cash leaving the Treasury. SpendingVault does not convert the New Hampshire 90 bucket into outlays. Keep the unspecified-bucket label when the figure is reused. The 2,534-award count is a record stock, not unique vendors.

Congressional district is USAspending place-of-performance, not the recipient HQ. District 90/98 are USAspending unspecified/non-voting buckets.