New Jersey vs Ohio on USAspending: $8.1B vs $8.1B

Two $8.1B stocks, one very different file

These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays. Ohio’s $8.1B edges New Jersey’s $8.1B by a thin margin. The comparison scores place of performance in the award file. Among two large states with nearly identical dollar stocks, the files diverge on every other cut: people, rows, intensity, and recency.

Award counts are not close. New Jersey has 1,162,765 awards; Ohio has 168,038. New Jersey’s file is busier in rows on a dollar stock that is essentially matched. Ohio’s $8.1B on 168,038 actions implies a much heavier typical booking than New Jersey’s $8.1B spread across 1,162,765 records.

New Jersey’s $92.49 versus Ohio’s $61.66

Ohio’s 11,883,304 residents exceed New Jersey’s 9,500,851. After dividing the obligation stocks by those Census counts, New Jersey shows $92.49 per capita and Ohio shows $61.66. Intensity favors New Jersey even though Ohio holds the slightly larger stacked total. Population is not the engine of this ranking.

A $92.49 per-person reading in New Jersey on 9,500,851 residents is an intensity fact attached to $8.1B. Ohio’s $61.66 on 11,883,304 residents is attached to $8.1B. This table scores USAspending place of performance, not GDP. Two similar stocks can hide a wide intensity gap and a wider row-count gap.

Pharmaceuticals in New Jersey, aircraft engines in Ohio

New Jersey’s top industry is pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing. Ohio’s is aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing. Those labels mark the largest NAICS slice in each state’s file, not a full industrial census. Drug-manufacturing awards and engine-parts awards are different lead products sitting on two $8.1B stocks.

A pharmaceutical-preparation lead inside New Jersey’s 1,162,765-award file can sit among many smaller actions. An aircraft-engine lead can concentrate propulsion manufacturing inside Ohio’s 168,038-award file. Mix and scale both differ. Neither industry name explains every dollar.

FY2026: $878.7M in New Jersey vs $732.7M in Ohio

FY2026 obligations are $878.7M in New Jersey and $732.7M in Ohio. New Jersey’s latest year is ahead, reversing the thin stacked ranking. Recency questions belong in FY2026. The stacked totals remain the full USAspending.gov aggregate this comparison uses. Both years are obligations, not outlays.

Do not divide those FY figures by New Jersey’s 1,162,765 or Ohio’s 168,038 all-years awards. Per capita of $92.49 on 9,500,851 residents versus $61.66 on 11,883,304 residents is the intensity comparison. Both cuts are USAspending.gov obligations.

A dollar tie with inverted rows

Ohio leads stacked dollars by a thin margin ($8.1B vs $8.1B) and population (11,883,304 vs 9,500,851). New Jersey leads award count (1,162,765 vs 168,038), per capita ($92.49 vs $61.66), and FY2026 ($878.7M vs $732.7M). Those splits are why New Jersey versus Ohio cannot be reduced to two identical $8.1B files.

Pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing versus aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing is mix inside files that contain many other industries. Use the New Jersey and Ohio hubs for agencies and recipients. Keep both $8.1B figures labeled as obligations.

How to use the New Jersey and Ohio hubs

Two $8.1B stocks with 1,162,765 versus 168,038 awards is a dollar tie with inverted rows. Per capita of $92.49 versus $61.66 on 9,500,851 and 11,883,304 residents favors New Jersey, as does FY2026’s $878.7M versus $732.7M. Open the New Jersey hub and the Ohio hub for agencies and recipients. Pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing versus aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing is mix on those very different row counts.

These are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays. Do not divide latest-year dollars by all-years award counts. Place of performance can differ from where the paying agency sits. Use the hubs for the next drill-down. Keep both $8.1B figures labeled as obligations so a dollar tie is not mistaken for identical files. Typical booking is heavier in Ohio on this pair.

New Jersey versus Ohio is a dollar tie of $8.1B versus $8.1B with 1,162,765 awards versus 168,038. Pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing and aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing are lead slices. FY2026 of $878.7M versus $732.7M favors New Jersey. Per capita is $92.49 versus $61.66 on 9,500,851 and 11,883,304 residents. Obligations remain the unit. The New Jersey and Ohio hubs hold the next tables. A dollar tie is not identical files. Two $8.1B stocks with 1,162,765 versus 168,038 awards are a dollar tie with inverted rows. FY2026’s $878.7M versus $732.7M and $92.49 versus $61.66 per capita on 9,500,851 and 11,883,304 residents favor New Jersey. Pharmaceuticals versus aircraft engines is mix.

Questions

Which state has more federal spending, New Jersey or Ohio?

Ohio leads by a thin margin in stacked USAspending.gov obligations: $8.1B versus New Jersey’s $8.1B. New Jersey has far more awards (1,162,765 vs 168,038). Ohio has more people (11,883,304 vs 9,500,851). Spending per capita is $92.49 in New Jersey and $61.66 in Ohio. FY2026 obligations are $878.7M and $732.7M. These are obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Are New Jersey and Ohio tied on federal obligations?

The stacked totals are both $8.1B, with Ohio slightly ahead. The files are not tied. New Jersey logs 1,162,765 awards against Ohio’s 168,038. Per capita is $92.49 versus $61.66. FY2026 favors New Jersey ($878.7M vs $732.7M). Populations are 9,500,851 and 11,883,304. A dollar tie can hide inverted rows.

What industries lead New Jersey and Ohio federal awards?

New Jersey’s top industry is pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing. Ohio’s is aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing. Those slices sit on two $8.1B obligation stocks. They mark the largest grouping in each file, not every award in either state. Award counts are 1,162,765 in New Jersey and 168,038 in Ohio.

Are New Jersey vs Ohio figures Treasury outlays?

No. SpendingVault uses USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. The two $8.1B stacked totals and FY2026 amounts of $878.7M and $732.7M measure award commitments by place of performance, not Monthly Treasury Statement payments. Place of performance can differ from where the paying agency sits.