New York vs Texas on USAspending: $11.9B vs $72.7B, inverted rows

More New York awards, far fewer New York dollars

New York logs 705,506 awards on $11.9B. Texas logs 530,634 awards on $72.7B. Row volume and dollar stock are different rankings in this pair. A busier file is not automatically the heavier file, and a heavier file is not automatically the busier one. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance, not Treasury outlays. Cash payments can lag award dates. Headquarters can differ from the state coded on the award.

Readers who sort only by award count will miss $11.9B versus $72.7B. Readers who sort only by dollars will miss 705,506 versus 530,634. Hold both. Typical booking size moves with that split: fewer rows on more dollars means a heavier average action, not a moral grade. New York’s 705,506 awards on only $11.9B is a busy, thin-dollar file next to Texas’s heavier 530,634-award, $72.7B file.

$70.36 per person vs $686.10

Census counts are 19,867,248 in New York and 31,290,831 in Texas. Spending per capita is $70.36 versus $686.10. That ratio uses stacked obligations, not FY2026 alone and not GDP. A higher per-person reading means a thicker federal-award intensity on the Census denominator, nothing else.

Other communications equipment manufacturing as New York’s peak does not explain $70.36 per capita by itself. That ratio is $11.9B divided across 19,867,248 residents. Texas’s $72.7B across 31,290,831 residents produces $686.10. Population can lead while dollars trail, or the reverse. The table reports both. It does not convert either into outlays.

Communications equipment vs pharmaceutical manufacturing

New York’s top industry is other communications equipment manufacturing. Texas’s top industry is pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing. Those labels are the tallest NAICS bars on $11.9B and $72.7B, not a full industrial census of 705,506 or 530,634 actions. Mix is a peak. Scale is the stacked stock.

Treat the industry tags as a starting map, then return to dollars, rows, and per capita. Use the comparison hub for the side-by-side tables, then the New York and Texas state hubs for agencies and recipients.

FY2026: $1.4B vs $21.5B

FY2026 obligations are $1.4B in New York and $21.5B in Texas. Recency can agree with the stacked $11.9B versus $72.7B ranking or it can tighten or widen the gap. Do not divide those latest-year amounts by the all-years award counts of 705,506 and 530,634.

Per capita of $70.36 and $686.10 already divides stacked obligations by 19,867,248 and 31,290,831 residents. FY2026 is the recency cut of the same USAspending.gov series. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance, not Treasury outlays. Cash payments can lag award dates. Headquarters can differ from the state coded on the award.

How to read New York against Texas

Four headline cuts travel together: stacked dollars ($11.9B vs $72.7B), award counts (705,506 vs 530,634), population (19,867,248 vs 31,290,831), and per capita ($70.36 vs $686.10). They do not always pick the same leader. That disagreement is the reason this pair exists as a comparison rather than a single ranking.

Use the comparison hub for the side-by-side tables, then the New York and Texas state hubs for agencies and recipients. Keep every cut labeled as obligations. other communications equipment manufacturing versus pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing remains mix, not an explanation of every dollar.

New York’s $70.36 is the intensity floor in this pair

New York’s $11.9B on 19,867,248 residents produces $70.36 per capita. Texas’s $72.7B on 31,290,831 residents produces $686.10. New York still wins rows, 705,506 to 530,634. Other communications equipment manufacturing versus pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing is mix on that inversion. FY2026’s $1.4B versus $21.5B is recency.

A busy, low-intensity file is not an empty file. It is a different ranking pattern. Keep $11.9B and $72.7B labeled as USAspending.gov obligations. Use the New York and Texas hubs for agencies and recipients. Outlays remain a different Treasury series.

New York versus Texas on USAspending.gov is $11.9B versus $72.7B in stacked obligations, 705,506 versus 530,634 awards, 19,867,248 versus 31,290,831 residents, $70.36 versus $686.10 per capita, and $1.4B versus $21.5B in FY2026. Top industries remain other communications equipment manufacturing and pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing. Those cuts are the packet.

Do not divide FY2026 dollars by all-years award counts. Do not treat $70.36 and $686.10 as household income. Do not treat other communications equipment manufacturing or pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing as a complete industrial census. Place of performance can differ from headquarters. Cash outlays can lag. After the comparison table, the New York and Texas state hubs hold agencies and recipients.

Questions

Which has more federal spending, New York or Texas?

New York shows $11.9B in USAspending.gov obligations; Texas shows $72.7B. Award counts are 705,506 and 530,634. Populations are 19,867,248 and 31,290,831. Spending per capita is $70.36 versus $686.10. FY2026 obligations are $1.4B and $21.5B. These are obligations, not Treasury outlays.

What industries lead New York and Texas federal awards?

New York’s top industry is other communications equipment manufacturing. Texas’s top industry is pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing. Those slices sit on $11.9B and $72.7B in USAspending.gov obligations and on 705,506 versus 530,634 awards. They mark the largest grouping in each file, not every award.

How do New York and Texas compare on spending per capita?

Spending per capita is $70.36 in New York on 19,867,248 residents and $686.10 in Texas on 31,290,831 residents. Those ratios use stacked USAspending.gov obligations of $11.9B and $72.7B, not FY2026 alone and not GDP. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Are New York vs Texas figures Treasury outlays?

No. The $11.9B and $72.7B stacked totals, and FY2026 amounts of $1.4B and $21.5B, are USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Award counts are 705,506 and 530,634. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.