Skip to main content
← All guides

Rhode Island vs Wyoming on USAspending: $880.6M vs $598.9M

Rhode Island’s stacked USAspending.gov obligation stock is $880.6M; Wyoming’s is $598.9M. Rhode Island holds the larger Census file, 1,112,308 against 587,618, yet spending per capita runs the other way: $126.96 in Wyoming versus $71.48 in Rhode Island. Award volume favors Rhode Island, 11,923 against 9,330. FY2026 is close, $79.5M versus $74.6M. The figures are obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Key figures

  • Rhode Island $880.6M vs Wyoming $598.9M in stacked USAspending obligations.
  • Per capita $71.48 vs $126.96 on 1,112,308 vs 587,618 residents.
  • Awards 11,923 vs 9,330; FY2026 $79.5M vs $74.6M.
  • Top industries: nonchocolate confectionery manufacturing in Rhode Island; commercial building construction in Wyoming.
  • Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Rhode Island’s $880.6M stock against Wyoming’s hotter ratio

Rhode Island’s $880.6M stacked stock sits above Wyoming’s $598.9M. Census population leans the same way: 1,112,308 versus 587,618. Intensity does not. $126.96 per capita in Wyoming is hotter than Rhode Island’s $71.48. Cite those packet ratios beside the Census counts rather than treating them as a restatement of $880.6M and $598.9M.

Award volume follows the larger stock. Rhode Island’s 11,923 awards versus Wyoming’s 9,330 is a thicker action log. Row count is not average award size. Do not divide $880.6M by 11,923 or $598.9M by 9,330. Cite USAspending.gov for both the dollar file and the award file.

Nonchocolate confectionery versus commercial building construction

Rhode Island’s lead NAICS is nonchocolate confectionery manufacturing. Wyoming’s is commercial and institutional building construction. A confectionery peak is a food-manufacturing first read on Rhode Island’s $880.6M mix. A commercial-building peak is a construction first read on Wyoming’s $598.9M mix. Candy manufacturing and building work are not the same label.

The 11,923 Rhode Island awards and 9,330 Wyoming awards include many actions outside those two industries. Use the Rhode Island and Wyoming state hubs for agencies and recipients. Both peaks are USAspending.gov obligation mixes. Outlays are not in the packet.

Rhode Island’s 11,923 awards sit on $880.6M. Wyoming’s 9,330 awards sit on $598.9M. FY2026 of $79.5M versus $74.6M stays close. Cite USAspending.gov and keep $71.48 and $126.96 labeled as obligation ratios.

FY2026: Rhode Island’s $79.5M versus Wyoming’s $74.6M

Fiscal year 2026 obligations are $79.5M in Rhode Island and $74.6M in Wyoming. Recency preserves Rhode Island’s stacked dollar lead, but the latest-year gap is thin. Treat the year as a recency slice of obligations, not as Treasury cash already paid.

Do not divide $79.5M or $74.6M by 11,923 or 9,330 all-years awards. Spending per capita of $71.48 and $126.96 already sits beside Census counts of 1,112,308 and 587,618. Cite USAspending.gov for both cuts.

What $126.96 looks like on 587,618 residents

Wyoming’s $598.9M on 587,618 people produces $126.96 per capita, hotter than Rhode Island’s $71.48 on 1,112,308. The construction peak sits on that hotter ratio and on 9,330 awards. The $74.6M FY2026 slice is the recency cut on the smaller stacked stock, close to Rhode Island’s $79.5M.

Rhode Island’s confectionery peak, 11,923 awards, and $880.6M stacked stock remain the larger all-years file. Read a New England state against a Mountain West state as a stacked-versus-intensity contrast. Keep every dollar figure labeled as a USAspending.gov obligation.

How to read Rhode Island versus Wyoming

Read Rhode Island first on stacked dollars ($880.6M vs $598.9M), population (1,112,308 vs 587,618), awards (11,923 vs 9,330), and FY2026 ($79.5M vs $74.6M). Read Wyoming first on spending per capita ($126.96 vs $71.48). Note nonchocolate confectionery manufacturing versus commercial and institutional building construction.

The comparison hub holds the tables. The Rhode Island and Wyoming hubs hold agencies and recipients. Outlays are a different series. Cite USAspending.gov. Keep $71.48 and $126.96 labeled as Census-based obligation ratios.

Confectionery dollars against Mountain West intensity

Rhode Island’s $880.6M stacked stock, 1,112,308 residents, 11,923 awards, and $79.5M FY2026 slice are the larger all-years file. Wyoming’s $126.96 per capita on 587,618 residents is the hotter intensity ranking on $598.9M. FY2026 stays close, $79.5M versus $74.6M. Nonchocolate confectionery manufacturing and commercial and institutional building construction are the two first filters. Candy and buildings are not interchangeable labels.

Cite USAspending.gov. Keep $71.48 and $126.96 labeled as Census-based obligation ratios. Outlays are not in the packet. The comparison hub holds the tables. The Rhode Island and Wyoming hubs hold agencies and recipients. Do not divide $880.6M or $598.9M by 11,923 or 9,330.

Questions

Does Rhode Island or Wyoming have more federal spending?
Rhode Island leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations $880.6M to Wyoming’s $598.9M, awards 11,923 to 9,330, and FY2026 obligations $79.5M to $74.6M. Wyoming leads spending per capita $126.96 to $71.48. Population is 1,112,308 in Rhode Island and 587,618 in Wyoming.
What industries lead in Rhode Island and Wyoming?
Rhode Island’s top industry is nonchocolate confectionery manufacturing. Wyoming’s is commercial and institutional building construction. Those labels are the largest NAICS slices on $880.6M and $598.9M. Award counts are 11,923 in Rhode Island and 9,330 in Wyoming.
Why is Wyoming’s per-capita figure higher?
The packet reports $126.96 per capita in Wyoming on 587,618 residents and $71.48 in Rhode Island on 1,112,308. Stacked stocks are $598.9M versus $880.6M. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations divided by Census population where present. The smaller stock sits with the hotter ratio.
Are Rhode Island vs Wyoming figures Treasury outlays?
No. The $880.6M and $598.9M totals, and FY2026 amounts of $79.5M and $74.6M, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($71.48 vs $126.96) uses Census population where present. This packet does not publish outlays or average award size.

State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.