FY2024 USAspending in South Dakota’s at-large district

Why the file uses district 00

South Dakota elects one at-large member of the House. USAspending.gov stores that statewide seat as district 00, written here as SD-00. The $20.3 billion FY2024 obligation total is the place-of-performance roll-up for that at-large geography, not a “zero district” and not an unspecified bucket. 86,719 awards are the matching SD-00 row count.

District 00 is not district 90 or 98. Those codes are USAspending unspecified and non-voting bins. SD-00 is the mapped at-large seat. Unspecified South Dakota performance, if any, would live on a 90 page rather than inside this at-large table. Do not treat $20.3 billion as a calendar-year 2024 figure. Federal FY2024 starts October 1.

$20.3 billion on 86,719 award records

The $20.3 billion figure is the obligation aggregate on award records whose place of performance is South Dakota at-large for fiscal year 2024. Obligation means a recorded commitment. It is not Treasury cash already paid, and it is not South Dakota’s state operating budget. Eighty-six thousand seven hundred nineteen rows is a thick file; that count is almost certainly many small actions rather than unique vendors.

The packet’s year range is FY2024 only. First year and last year are both 2024. Later USAspending.gov corrections can revise $20.3 billion and the 86,719-award count. District 00 names the at-large seat. District 90 would be unspecified South Dakota performance, a different page from this $20.3 billion hub.

Place of performance across a statewide seat

Even for an at-large state, the district field is still place of performance, not recipient headquarters. A contractor based outside South Dakota can appear on SD-00 if the performance location is coded to South Dakota’s at-large district. A South Dakota-headquartered recipient can post dollars to another state’s district if that is where performance is reported.

Because South Dakota has a single House district, SD-00 covers the state’s mapped place-of-performance rows for that seat. It is still not a substitute for every federal dollar touching South Dakota: unspecified 90/98 rows, if present, stay on their own pages, and recipient-location maps are a different cut.

86,719 rows can include modifications. The packet does not count unique South Dakota vendors. The South Dakota At-Large hub is the table. $20.3 billion remains the FY2024 obligation roll-up for SD-00 place of performance.

86,719 awards in the at-large extract

86,719 is the FY2024 record count for SD-00 place of performance. Modifications and assistance actions can each add a row. The packet does not publish unique recipients or an agency mix.

Do not divide $20.3 billion by 86,719 awards. That quotient is not in the packet. Keep the dollar total and the row count as separate facts and use the South Dakota At-Large hub to inspect lines.

A complete SD-00 citation names at-large (district 00), FY2024, USAspending.gov, place of performance, obligations, $20.3 billion, and 86,719 awards. Calling the code “unspecified” would confuse it with district 90.

Obligations versus outlays, and the state hub

The $20.3 billion total is the obligation series. Outlays measure disbursements and can lag. SpendingVault does not recast SD-00 as cash paid. If another South Dakota headline disagrees, check series, fiscal year, and whether geography is performance or HQ.

The South Dakota state page is the statewide obligation view. SD-00 is the at-large place-of-performance district. The all-districts index lists other states’ mapped seats in the same format. This packet does not rank South Dakota against other districts. They are related but not interchangeable if unspecified 90 rows exist on their own hub.

Citing South Dakota’s at-large file without mixing codes

The $20.3 billion FY2024 obligation total for SD-00 answers how USAspending.gov tagged place of performance to South Dakota’s at-large district in that fiscal year. It does not convert 86,719 awards into unique firms, and it does not recode district 00 as a 90/98 leftover.

Outlay tables, headquarters maps, and calendar-year charts are other products. Do not drop $20.3 billion onto those grids unless they already use place of performance, federal FY2024, and obligations. The South Dakota state hub and the all-districts index remain the related geography on the same series rules.

Keep SD-00 labeled as the at-large mapped seat (district 00), not as a 90/98 leftover. $20.3 billion in FY2024 USAspending.gov obligations on 86,719 awards is the place-of-performance extract for South Dakota’s statewide House geography. 86,719 rows can include modifications and assistance actions; they are not unique vendors. Even statewide, headquarters outside South Dakota can appear when performance is coded SD-00, and a South Dakota headquarters can map dollars elsewhere when performance is coded there. The South Dakota state page is related but not interchangeable if unspecified 90 rows exist on their own hub. Outlay tables and calendar-year charts are other products. Do not drop $20.3 billion onto those grids unless they already use place of performance, federal FY2024, and obligations. First year and last year are both 2024. Cite SD-00 as at-large, FY2024, USAspending.gov, place of performance, obligations, $20.3 billion, and 86,719 awards.

Questions

How much federal spending is in South Dakota’s at-large district?

USAspending.gov shows $20.3 billion in FY2024 obligations with place of performance in South Dakota’s at-large district (SD-00). That is not an outlay total and not South Dakota’s state budget. The extract counts 86,719 awards for SD-00 in FY2024. The packet year range is FY2024 only.

What does district 00 mean for South Dakota?

USAspending stores South Dakota’s single at-large House seat as district 00. SD-00 is that mapped seat, not an unspecified 90 bucket and not a non-voting 98 bucket. The $20.3 billion total uses that at-large place-of-performance code. 86,719 awards share the same SD-00 tag.

Why does SD-00 have 86,719 awards?

That is the FY2024 award-record count for the SD-00 place-of-performance code. It is not a unique-vendor count. Those records sum to $20.3 billion in obligations. A thick file usually means many smaller actions. The packet does not break the file by agency.

Is $20.3 billion in SD-00 already paid out?

No. $20.3 billion is an obligation sum from FY2024 award records. Outlays are a different series. SpendingVault does not convert the South Dakota at-large obligation total into Treasury outlays. Cite the figure with the obligation label and the FY2024 window.