USAspending in Utah District 90 (non-voting / unspecified)

What District 90 means in USAspending

USAspending uses 90 and 98 as unspecified or non-voting congressional-district codes on place of performance. For Utah, 90 is that residual bin. The FY2024 obligation sum in the bin is $24.5 billion. The award count is 6,037.

Do not read UT-90 as “the 90th district of Utah.” Utah’s House seats are numbered far below 90. The code marks awards whose Utah performance location was not assigned to a standard numbered district field. It is a dataset bucket sitting on top of Utah place of performance.

Six thousand thirty-seven rows in a residual file

Six thousand thirty-seven awards is a defined file for a leftover geography code. Those rows still sum to a defined dollar total: $24.5 billion in FY2024 obligations. Row count is not unique vendors. The same recipient can appear on many awards.

This packet does not provide a unique-recipient count or an agency split. Use the hub table to see how the 6,037 records break out; this guide only certifies the two rollup facts and the FY2024 window.

Place of performance inside Utah, coded 90

Congressional district here is still place of performance, not recipient headquarters. A company based outside Utah can appear in the $24.5 billion if USAspending codes the work to UT-90. A Utah-headquartered firm can be missing if performance is coded to a numbered Utah district or to another state.

HQ maps of the “Utah market” will not match this page. The page answers a narrower question: FY2024 obligations whose performance district is the UT-90 bucket.

Obligations, not outlays, in FY2024

The $24.5 billion is an obligation total. Obligations are legal commitments recorded in USAspending. Outlays are payments. A single-year obligation stock is not a cash-flow statement for Utah.

First year and last year are both 2024. This hub does not contain a second fiscal year for comparison. Report the number as FY2024 obligations for UT-90 place of performance, on 6,037 awards.

Utah statewide and district index pages

The Utah state page rolls Utah place-of-performance activity at the state level. The UT-90 hub is this residual district code. The all-districts index lists other 90 and 98 buckets alongside numbered House districts. Those views share the same USAspending obligation source. Code 90 is a USAspending geography bucket, not a constituency voters elect.

How UT-90 sits next to numbered Utah seats

The Utah state page rolls statewide place-of-performance activity. UT-90 is narrower: 6,037 awards and $24.5 billion tagged to the unspecified 90 code. Those two views will not match dollar-for-dollar if numbered Utah district codes exist in the source file. This packet only certifies the 90-code rollup.

A precise UT-90 citation is $24.5 billion in FY2024 USAspending obligations on 6,037 awards with unspecified or non-voting place-of-performance code 90. That is not a House seat and not a count of unique firms in Utah. Vendors based outside Utah can sit inside the $24.5 billion when performance is coded UT-90. Utah-based vendors can sit outside it when performance is coded to a numbered district. Keep the $24.5 billion on a residual line in any Utah table. Do not fold it into a numbered Utah district. Obligations are commitments. Outlays are not this total. First year and last year are both 2024, so UT-90 has no trend line here.

Report UT-90 as a residual USAspending geography line, not as a constituency. $24.5 billion in FY2024 obligations on 6,037 awards is the certified rollup for unspecified or non-voting place-of-performance code 90 in Utah. That is not a House seat voters elect, and 6,037 is not a unique-firm count. Vendors based outside Utah can sit inside $24.5 billion when performance is tagged UT-90. Utah-based vendors can sit outside it when performance is tagged to a numbered district. The Utah state page is a wider grain and will not equal $24.5 billion if numbered Utah codes exist in the source file. Keep $24.5 billion on a leftover line in any Utah table. Do not fold it into a numbered district. Obligations are commitments recorded in USAspending.gov. Outlays are payments and are not this total. First year and last year are both 2024, so UT-90 has no trend line here. Later source corrections can revise both figures. Until then, cite $24.5 billion and 6,037 awards with UT-90 place of performance, FY2024 only, obligations not outlays, district 90 not a voting seat.

Questions

How much did USAspending record for Utah District 90 in FY2024?

USAspending.gov shows $24.5 billion in FY2024 obligations for Utah District 90 place of performance, across 6,037 awards. Code 90 is an unspecified or non-voting bucket. The figures are obligations, not outlays, and cover FY2024 only. Those figures are FY2024 USAspending obligations with UT-90 place of performance, covering 6,037 awards, not outlays and not a headquarters extract.

Does Utah have a 90th congressional district?

No. USAspending’s 90 code is an unspecified or non-voting place-of-performance bucket in the award data. It is not a House seat voters elect. The $24.5 billion total is a residual geography code for Utah performance location on 6,037 awards. Keep $24.5 billion and 6,037 as separate certified facts from USAspending.gov for fiscal year 2024 only.

Why are there 6,037 awards on this page?

That is the FY2024 award count USAspending ties to the UT-90 place-of-performance code. It is a record count, not a unique-vendor count. Those records sum to $24.5 billion in obligations. The packet does not break the file into agencies or award types.

If a contractor is based in Utah, is the award on this page?

Only if place of performance is coded UT-90. Headquarters in Utah is not the district field. Work performed in a numbered Utah district or another state will not sit in this $24.5 billion total even when the recipient’s office is in Utah.