How much Indian Housing Block Grant spending is in Alaska?

USAspending.gov shows $1,756,598,645.02 in CFDA 14.867 obligations coded to Alaska across 65 awards. The join uses the program number and Alaska place of performance. The total is obligations, not outlays.

Does 65 awards mean 65 villages received grants?

No. The extract counts 65 award records tagged to CFDA 14.867 and Alaska. Regional authorities and modifications can share the tape. The implied mean is about $27,024,595 per award from the two packet facts.

Is $1.76 billion Alaska’s full federal spending?

No. $1,756,598,645.02 is only the Indian Housing Block Grants cell. Other CFDA programs with Alaska place of performance sit on the statewide hub. Nationwide 14.867 is not limited to Alaska.

Do these obligations equal housing units built?

No. $1,756,598,645.02 is an obligation sum. Outlays and unit completions are different series. Construction seasons can lag the federal obligation.

Indian Housing Block Grants in Alaska

Name: Indian Housing Block Grants federal funding in Alaska
Creator: SpendingVault
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

CFDA 14.867 — federal program obligations to Alaska

Total obligated

$1.90B

Awards

Indian Housing Block Grants (CFDA 14.867) show $1,756,598,645.02 in USAspending.gov obligations coded to Alaska across 65 awards. The pair is a HUD NAHASDA catalog line joined to place of performance, not a ranking of regional corporations and not a count of village housing units. Obligations are commitments, not barge-delivered materials. The Alaska × 14.867 overlay holds the rows.

Key figures

CFDA 14.867 shows $1,756,598,645.02 in USAspending obligations in Alaska.
Award count is 65; implied mean about $27.0 million.
The join is program × place of performance, not a village ranking.
Figures are obligations, not outlays.

Sixty-five NAHASDA records, one Alaska cell

This tie keeps USAspending assistance where CFDA 14.867 meets Alaska place of performance. The dollar book is $1,756,598,645.02. The award count is 65. Alaska’s tribal housing network includes regional housing authorities and village-level entities; sixty-five records do not equal 65 villages. Continuations, modifications, and multi-year formula shares can share the tape.

The join does not prove that Alaska’s climate, construction-cost premium, or remote logistics caused $1,756,598,645.02. Those are other series. This packet does not split new construction from weatherization. Correlation is not causation.

A reader who treats the cell as Alaska’s full HUD obligation book has left the CFDA-by-state definition. The 65 figure is a record count, not a unit count and not a village count.

More awards than Oklahoma’s 14.867 tape, similar dollars

Sixty-five awards under $1,756,598,645.02 imply a mean near $27,024,595 per award. That average is lower than a thicker-dollar, thinner-tape housing cell would produce, because the same catalog line can post more prime records in Alaska. The packet has no median and no regional-authority share.

Cite both columns without converting the mean into a typical house cost in a roadless community. USAspending.gov is the source; SpendingVault does not recast $27,024,595 as a unit price.

Full analysis: Indian Housing Block Grants federal obligations in Alaska →

Questions

How much Indian Housing Block Grant spending is in Alaska?: USAspending.gov shows $1,756,598,645.02 in CFDA 14.867 obligations coded to Alaska across 65 awards. The join uses the program number and Alaska place of performance. The total is obligations, not outlays.
Does 65 awards mean 65 villages received grants?: No. The extract counts 65 award records tagged to CFDA 14.867 and Alaska. Regional authorities and modifications can share the tape. The implied mean is about $27,024,595 per award from the two packet facts.
Is $1.76 billion Alaska’s full federal spending?: No. $1,756,598,645.02 is only the Indian Housing Block Grants cell. Other CFDA programs with Alaska place of performance sit on the statewide hub. Nationwide 14.867 is not limited to Alaska.
Do these obligations equal housing units built?: No. $1,756,598,645.02 is an obligation sum. Outlays and unit completions are different series. Construction seasons can lag the federal obligation.

USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.

How this pair fits

Indian Housing Block Grants federal obligations in Alaska

All data ties →