International Trade Commission in District of Columbia

ITC awards tagged to the District of Columbia

International Trade Commission as awarding agency, District of Columbia as place-of-performance: 177 records summing to $58,522,907.29. An International Trade Commission award coded outside DC is out. An award in District of Columbia from a different awarding agency is out even if the topic sounds related. The District of Columbia (DC) excludes Maryland and Virginia. An Arlington-coded award is VA even if a hearing sits in the District. Awarding agency 034 is the ITC parent. Investigation-type splits are unpublished.

One hundred seventy-seven records against $58,522,907.29 is a thin ITC file. A DC tag often marks Commission place of performance, not a docket census. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not read 177 as 177 unique investigations, named cases, or unique hearings. The overlay International Trade Commission in District of Columbia is the both-keys table. District of Columbia federal spending is the all-agency state hub. International Trade Commission is the agency book without a DC filter. All spending ties lists other joins. Named investigations are unpublished. Do not read 177 as unique Section 337 matters or as unique District contractors. Correlation is not causation: District of Columbia did not cause $58,522,907.29 by existing as a large or small place. Population and outcome scores are not packet facts. The join is 034 × DC only.

Not unique investigations, named cases, or unique hearings

$58,522,907.29 does not measure unique investigations, named cases, or unique hearings. Those series are not USAspending fields on this aggregate. The cell sums award obligations with awarding-agency code 034 and a DC place-of-performance tag. Awarding agency 034 is the ITC parent. Investigation-type splits are unpublished.

Do not treat 177 awards as a census of unique investigations, named cases, or unique hearings. Parent hubs are supposed to be larger than this pair. If District of Columbia federal spending or International Trade Commission matched $58,522,907.29 and 177, the join would be pointless. Use the overlay when both keys must stay on. Maryland and Virginia ITC joins are other pairs, not addends. Keep $58,522,907.29 on DC. Hearings held in the District are not a published share of 177 rows.

Questions

How much has the International Trade Commission obligated in District of Columbia?

USAspending.gov records $58,522,907.29 across 177 awards with awarding agency 034 and a District of Columbia tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a count of unique investigations, named cases, or unique hearings. International Trade Commission in District of Columbia is the live overlay for this pair. Keep both keys when quoting $58,522,907.29.

Is $58,522,907.29 a measure of unique investigations, named cases, or unique hearings?

No. The packet publishes $58,522,907.29 and 177 awards for agency 034 inside DC coding. Those other series are unpublished here. Unique recipients are unpublished. Quote the dollar total and the award count together. Obligations are not outlays. Keep both keys.

Does 177 ITC awards mean 177 trade investigations?

No. 177 is the award-record count for 034 × DC. Combined with $58,522,907.29, the average is about $330,638. Modifications and repeat instruments add rows. 177 is not unique investigations, named cases, or unique hearings. Later ingests can revise the count. Prefer the overlay if the table moved.

Where is the live ITC–District of Columbia table?

International Trade Commission in District of Columbia is the overlay. District of Columbia federal spending and International Trade Commission are the parents, not addends. All spending ties lists other pairs. Keep both sides of the join when citing $58,522,907.29. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.