Federal Communications Commission in Vermont

A thick FCC file on Vermont

Federal Communications Commission as awarding agency, Vermont as place-of-performance: 1,635 records summing to $77,709,804.86. A Federal Communications Commission award coded outside VT is out. An award in Vermont from a different awarding agency is out even if the topic sounds related. Vermont (VT) excludes New Hampshire, New York, Massachusetts, and Quebec. A Manchester-coded award is NH even if a tower sits in Vermont. Bureaus inside awarding agency 027 stay unpublished. Universal-service product names are not packet facts.

One thousand six hundred thirty-five awards against $77,709,804.86 is thicker than New Hampshire’s 1,435-row FCC cell and still a record count, not unique locations. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not read 1,635 as 1,635 unique broadband locations, named carriers, or unique licenses. The overlay Federal Communications Commission in Vermont is the both-keys table. Vermont federal spending is the all-agency state hub. Federal Communications Commission is the agency book without a VT filter. All spending ties lists other joins. Named carriers are unpublished. Do not treat 1,635 as unique Vermont households or as a rural-versus-Champlain split. Correlation is not causation: Vermont did not cause $77,709,804.86 by existing as a large or small place. Population and outcome scores are not packet facts. The join is 027 × VT only.

Not rural broadband locations or named ISPs

$77,709,804.86 does not measure unique broadband locations, named carriers, or unique licenses. Those series are not USAspending fields on this aggregate. The cell sums award obligations with awarding-agency code 027 and a VT place-of-performance tag. Bureaus inside awarding agency 027 stay unpublished. Universal-service product names are not packet facts.

Do not treat 1,635 awards as a census of unique broadband locations, named carriers, or unique licenses. Parent hubs are supposed to be larger than this pair. If Vermont federal spending or Federal Communications Commission matched $77,709,804.86 and 1,635, the join would be pointless. Use the overlay when both keys must stay on. New Hampshire, New York, and Massachusetts FCC joins are other pairs, not addends. Do not add this $77,709,804.86 to a New Hampshire FCC join. Keep the VT tag.

Questions

How much has the Federal Communications Commission obligated in Vermont?

USAspending.gov records $77,709,804.86 across 1,635 awards with awarding agency 027 and a Vermont tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a count of unique broadband locations, named carriers, or unique licenses. Federal Communications Commission in Vermont is the live overlay for this pair. Keep both keys when quoting $77,709,804.86.

Is $77,709,804.86 a measure of unique broadband locations, named carriers, or unique licenses?

No. The packet publishes $77,709,804.86 and 1,635 awards for agency 027 inside VT coding. Those other series are unpublished here. Unique recipients are unpublished. Quote the dollar total and the award count together. Obligations are not outlays. Keep both keys.

Does 1,635 FCC awards mean 1,635 Vermont locations?

No. 1,635 is the award-record count for 027 × VT. Combined with $77,709,804.86, the average is about $47,529. Modifications and repeat instruments add rows. 1,635 is not unique broadband locations, named carriers, or unique licenses. Later ingests can revise the count. Prefer the overlay if the table moved.

Where is the live FCC–Vermont table?

Federal Communications Commission in Vermont is the overlay. Vermont federal spending and Federal Communications Commission are the parents, not addends. All spending ties lists other pairs. Keep both sides of the join when citing $77,709,804.86. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.