Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (Formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) in Vermont

The 84.367 × Vermont intersection

The Catalog files this line as SUPPORTING EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTION STATE GRANTS (FORMERLY IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY STATE GRANTS). The former title is a synonym on the same CFDA number, not a second pot of money. Where 84.367 meets Vermont place of performance, obligations sum to $60,805,386.22 on 6 awards. That figure is smaller than the Delaware 84.367 cell on this site; the two states are separate joins and must not be added together here.

Vermont federal spending still includes every other program. The national 84.367 hub still includes every other state. This page is only the pair. $60,805,386.22 is an obligation aggregate from USAspending.gov, not an outlay and not a count of educators in Burlington, Montpelier, or Rutland.

Packet facts stop at $60,805,386.22, 6 awards, VT, and 84.367. Recipient names, LEAs, and educator counts are not in the facts. Do not invent contractors, districts, or award recipients. Correlation is not causation.

What 84.367 does and does not include in Vermont

Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies and IDEA Part B sit on other Education Department numbers. Mixing those dollars into $60,805,386.22 would invent a broader total than this 84.367 × VT cell contains. Facts available: Vermont, CFDA 84.367, $60,805,386.22, 6 awards.

Dividing $60,805,386.22 by 6 yields about $10.13 million per award. That average resembles a handful of large state-level instruments, not a typical school professional-development contract and not a median. Unique recipients are unpublished. Six is not a count of Vermont supervisory unions or teachers.

Questions

How much Supporting Effective Instruction funding is obligated in Vermont?

USAspending.gov shows $60,805,386.22 in CFDA 84.367 obligations coded to Vermont across 6 awards. The former Improving Teacher Quality title is the same catalog number. The total is obligations, not outlays. Keep 84.367 and Vermont together when citing $60,805,386.22.

Can I add Vermont and Delaware 84.367 totals on this page?

No. This join is Vermont only. $60,805,386.22 does not include Delaware or any other state. Mixing states would invent a figure the packet does not publish. Six is a Vermont record count, not a multi-state census. Keep the obligation label on $60,805,386.22 and name both Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (Formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) and Vermont. Original filings for CFDA 84.367 remain on USAspending.gov.

Does 6 awards mean 6 Vermont school districts?

Six is a USAspending award-record count, not a district or teacher census. The implied mean is about $10.13 million per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. Obligations of $60,805,386.22 are not outlays. Packet facts stop at $60,805,386.22, 6 awards, VT, and 84.367. Place of performance is a geography tag, not a roster of named recipients.

Do these obligations equal professional-development cash already spent?

No. $60,805,386.22 is an obligation sum. Outlays are a different USAspending series. This packet has no educator count. Keep the obligation label when citing the 84.367 × VT pair. Keep Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (Formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) and Vermont together when citing $60,805,386.22. The packet publishes no fiscal year, so the 84.367 × Vermont cell cannot be annualized from these facts.