Management consulting federal obligations in Oklahoma (NAICS 541611)

NAICS 541611 and Oklahoma as a mgmt-consulting join

This page intersects one six-digit industry and one state. $149,661,243.72 is the obligation sum where both filters are true. NAICS 541611 is administrative management and general management consulting services, not HR consulting and not process/logistics consulting. It is not a statewide spending total and not a national NAICS 541611 total. Those parent tables live on Oklahoma federal spending and NAICS 541611.

529 awards against $149.7 million is a mid-thick professional-services cell rather than a single retainer vehicle. 529 is an award-record count. Modifications can sit beside base awards. The packet does not say how many unique vendors produced the 529 lines. Reading 529 as factories, ships, or clinics in Oklahoma would confuse actions with establishments.

Oklahoma industries lists other NAICS codes with OK place of performance. All spending ties indexes other state–industry pairs. Do not sum those indexes into $149,661,243.72. The headline remains $149,661,243.72 on 529 awards for this pair alone.

General management consulting, not HR or logistics shops

NAICS 541611 is a Census industry code assigned on the award. NAICS 541611 is administrative management and general management consulting services, not HR consulting and not process/logistics consulting. Human resources consulting (541612) and process, physical distribution, and logistics consulting (541614) are different codes. Those neighboring codes never enter $149,661,243.72 unless they also appear as 541611, which they do not. Keep the six-digit label when you cite the Oklahoma cell.

Consulting folklore is ordinary speech, not extra packet dollars. Unique contractors are unpublished. Dividing $149,661,243.72 by 529 produces about $282,914. That quotient is arithmetic, not a typical Oklahoma contract. There is no median, no top-award table, and no fiscal-year breakout on this packet. Do not treat the mean as a posted unit price.

Oklahoma geography on a mgmt-consulting cell

Oklahoma place of performance can cover Oklahoma City, Tulsa, or a reporting address near Tinker. The packet has no site split. Inside the OK tag, named cities are not broken out. The packet has one state key. A named city can sit inside $149,661,243.72 only if its awards carry NAICS 541611 and OK — which this narrative cannot verify.

Place-of-performance geography is not the same as contractor headquarters. A firm based elsewhere can perform in Oklahoma, and a Oklahoma address can appear on work done out of state. This join reports the coded pair, not a logistics map. Oklahoma federal spending remains the statewide parent.

Obligations versus outlays for Oklahoma 541611

USAspending obligations are commitments, not checks that have cleared. $149,661,243.72 can include amounts that will be paid later, cancelled, or modified. The packet does not publish outlays. 529 is not a payment count. Quote NAICS 541611 in Oklahoma as obligations and leave fiscal-year folklore off the citation — years are unpublished here.

What the mgmt-consulting–Oklahoma pair does not prove

The mgmt-consulting–Oklahoma pair does not prove that Oklahoma specialized in this industry because of federal demand, or the reverse. Consulting folklore is ordinary speech, not extra packet dollars. Unique contractors are unpublished. Campaign-finance tables are a different dataset; donations do not fund these awards. Keep both sides of the join in any headline: NAICS 541611 and Oklahoma.

How to cite NAICS 541611 in Oklahoma

Cite USAspending.gov, NAICS 541611 (Administrative Management And General Management Consulting Services), Oklahoma (OK), $149,661,243.72, and 529 awards. Note that the figures are obligations. Point readers to Oklahoma federal spending, NAICS 541611, Oklahoma industries, and All spending ties rather than collapsing those pages into this cell. Mean per award stays about $282,914 as a ratio only. Readers who reuse this state-industry snapshot should keep both sides of the join in the same sentence, cite USAspending.gov as the source, and treat award rows as records rather than unique vendors. The live hubs linked from this page can refresh the snapshot; this narrative does not invent a fiscal year, a recipient list, or an outlay total that the packet omitted. Place of performance remains a geography tag, not proof that work stayed inside the named state. Keep the obligation word on the headline dollar figure in every footnote.

Questions

How much has NAICS 541611 obligated in Oklahoma?

The pair totals $149,661,243.72 across 529 awards, per USAspending.gov NAICS industry aggregates by place of performance state. Those are obligations for Administrative Management And General Management Consulting Services inside Oklahoma coding, not outlays and not every federal dollar in Oklahoma. Source filings stay on USAspending.gov.

How many mgmt-consulting awards sit in Oklahoma?

529 award records produced $149,661,243.72. Concentration or dispersion is visible only as that count against that sum. About $282,914 per award is $149,661,243.72 divided by 529, not a typical Oklahoma purchase. The packet does not list unique recipients or a median award.

Is this Oklahoma Tinker consulting spending?

The packet does not break 529 awards by installation or agency. $149,661,243.72 is NAICS 541611 obligations with Oklahoma place of performance. Base folklore is not a packet field. Quote management consulting and Oklahoma together. Those figures are obligations, not outlays, and they are not every federal dollar coded to the state. Keep both sides of the join in the citation and leave unique vendors unpublished.

Where are the parent Oklahoma and NAICS 541611 tables?

Use Oklahoma federal spending for the statewide industry mix, NAICS 541611 for the national industry page, Oklahoma industries for the state NAICS index, and All spending ties for other joins. This page quotes only the 541611 × OK cell. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.