Administrative Management And General Management Consulting Services federal obligations in Utah (NAICS 541611)

NAICS 541611 and Utah as a consulting join

This page intersects one six-digit industry and one state. $38,397,891.25 is the obligation sum where both filters are true. NAICS 541611 is administrative management and general management consulting services, not human-resources consulting as a separate census and not residual 541990. It is not Utah’s statewide spending total and not a national NAICS 541611 total. Those parent tables live on Utah federal spending and NAICS 541611.

141 is an award-record count. Modifications can sit beside base awards. The packet does not say how many unique vendors produced the 141 lines. Reading 141 as offices, FTE, or ‘Beltway firms with a Utah address’ would confuse actions with establishments.

Utah industries lists other NAICS codes with UT place of performance. All spending ties indexes other state–industry pairs. Do not sum those indexes into $38,397,891.25. The headline remains $38,397,891.25 on 141 awards for this pair alone.

General management consulting, not every 54-series code

USAspending labels NAICS 541611 as Administrative Management And General Management Consulting Services. Computer facilities management (541513) and other professional, scientific, and technical services (541990) are different codes; they are not rolled into this Utah overlay. Sharing Utah geography with those joins on other pages does not merge the dollars.

The industry hub for NAICS 541611 does not require Utah. Only this overlay applies both filters. The packet names no task orders, agencies, or consulting products. Award titles on the NAICS 541611 page are the place to see what a given line bought.

Place of performance in Utah

Utah on this join is a USAspending geography field. It is not a Salt Lake County-only overlay and not proof that consultants lived or billed from Utah for the full period of performance. Place of performance can list UT while later work occurs in another state; those states are not inside this total unless also coded UT.

The state hub for Utah shows how 541611 sits beside other industries in the same geography. This packet does not split metros, counties, or congressional districts. Awards can list Utah while the vendor’s headquarters sit elsewhere.

Obligations versus outlays on 141 awards

Dividing $38,397,891.25 by 141 yields about $272,325 per award on average. That mean is packet arithmetic, not a typical consulting invoice. Award count 141 is a record count, not a payment count. Readers who need transaction-level detail should use Utah industries and the NAICS 541611 hub.

An obligation is a legal commitment. $38,397,891.25 is that kind of sum. This packet has no outlay total and no fiscal-year split. Citing the figure as cash already spent in Utah over-reads the field.

What the pair does not prove

A consulting NAICS plus Utah is not a ranking of firms, a jobs number, or a claim that campaign contributions funded the awards. FEC filings and USAspending awards are different datasets. Keep $38,397,891.25 labeled as NAICS 541611 obligations with Utah place of performance.

A later ingest can restate the dollars or the 141 count without changing the join key of NAICS 541611 and UT. Correlation is not causation.

Utah’s 541611 overlay versus other Utah 54-series joins

Utah also carries computer facilities management (541513) and other professional overlays on this slice. Those are separate six-digit codes. $38,397,891.25 on 141 awards is 541611 only. A reader comparing Utah consulting to Utah facilities management is comparing two joins, not two chapters of one contract.

Oregon and Nebraska also have 541611 overlays in this batch with different dollar totals and award counts. Same NAICS, different geography. Do not average those state figures into a ‘western consulting’ number; the packets do not support that arithmetic. Utah federal spending, NAICS 541611, Utah industries, and All spending ties remain the four navigation points for this pair.

Readers who only need the headline can stop at NAICS 541611 in Utah: $38,397,891.25 across 141 awards. The rest of this page exists to keep that headline attached to both join sides, to the obligation-versus-outlay distinction, and to the four internal hubs listed above. Nothing in the packet supports a contractor roster, a fiscal-year split, or a claim that campaign donations funded these USAspending obligations.

Questions

How much has NAICS 541611 obligated in Utah?

USAspending.gov records $38,397,891.25 in obligations for NAICS 541611 (Administrative Management And General Management Consulting Services) with Utah place of performance, covering 141 awards. That is an obligation total, not an outlay total, and not the nationwide 541611 figure. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Does this include computer facilities management in Utah?

No. This join is NAICS 541611 only. Computer facilities management is NAICS 541513, a different code with its own Utah overlay if one exists. The $38,397,891.25 and 141 awards here do not absorb other 54-series industries. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Is 141 the number of consulting firms in Utah?

No. The extract lists 141 awards totaling $38,397,891.25. Modifications and delivery orders can multiply rows. Unique vendors are not published in this packet. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Where is the live management consulting–Utah table?

Utah federal spending is the state rollup. NAICS 541611 is the industry hub without a state filter. Utah industries lists other NAICS in Utah. All spending ties lists other pairs. The $38,397,891.25 and 141 awards are the 541611×UT join only. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.