Agency for International Development in California 32nd District (CA-32)

AID obligations coded to California 32nd District (CA-32)

Awarding agency 072 and congressional district CA-32 meet here. $122,590,167 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Agency for International Development nationwide, not every federal dollar coded to California 32nd District (CA-32), and not an outlay register. Open California 32nd District without this agency filter and Agency for International Development without a CA-32 filter. Correlation is not causation.

29 is an award-action count. Modifications and delivery orders can add rows. Unique vendors are unpublished. Dividing $122,590,167 by 29 yields about $4,227,247.14 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical invoice. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these obligations. 29 awards is a modest action file. Modifications and delivery orders can add rows without adding unique recipients.

Agency for International Development as awarding agency 072

Agency 072 is Agency for International Development. Twenty-nine awards do not name implementing organizations or partner countries. New York 10th is a different AID join, not a ranking. Confusing this join with California statewide AID totals or the New York 10th AID overlay would be a different overlay. Packet facts on the agency side are the name Agency for International Development, code 072, and the join dollars $122,590,167. Any other recipient or installation list would be invented.

Agency for International Development drops the district filter. Other districts with Agency for International Development awards are other ties. This page quotes only California 32nd District (CA-32). Place of performance in CA-32 does not convert the cell into a California foreign-aid budget. Do not invent implementer names. Campaign-finance tables do not fund USAspending.

California 32nd District (CA-32) as place of performance

California 32nd District (CA-32) is a domestic congressional place-of-performance code. It is not a foreign-country field. Other California districts are other pairs. Place of performance CA-32 is a geography field in the award file. It does not prove residency of workers or vendors. California federal spending is the statewide parent and includes other districts.

The district's all-agency obligation total is $10,560,752,713.38. $122,590,167 is the Agency for International Development slice of that book, about 1.2%. Remaining district dollars sit with other awarding agencies on California 32nd District, not inside this join. District 90/98 multi and non-voting placeholders are omitted from this harvest by design.

Twenty-nine award rows versus the district-wide book

29 awards against $122,590,167 implies about $4,227,247.14 per award. That mean is not a unit price and not a jobs figure. With 29 rows, a few large instruments can dominate. Treat the count as records in an aggregate, not as 29 finished projects. All spending ties lists other pairs. Do not annualize without a year field in the packet. Do not per-capita or per-recipient the dollar total; those denominators are unpublished.

What the AID × CA-32 pair cannot prove

An obligation is a legal commitment. $122,590,167 is that kind of sum for Agency for International Development inside CA-32 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. This packet has no outlay total and no fiscal-year split. Citing the figure as cash already spent in California 32nd District (CA-32) over-reads the field. Do not rank California 32nd District (CA-32) as a winner or loser versus other districts. Keep both sides in the citation: Agency for International Development and California 32nd District (CA-32).

Parent hubs around this AID overlay

Open California 32nd District for the district rollup, Agency for International Development for the agency rollup, California federal spending for California statewide spending, and All spending ties for other pairs. None of those links convert this cell into California statewide AID totals or the New York 10th AID overlay, into outlays this packet omits, or into a contractor list. Cite Agency for International Development in California 32nd District (CA-32), $122,590,167, 29 awards, USAspending.gov, obligations only. Place of performance in CA-32 does not convert the cell into a California foreign-aid budget. Do not invent implementer names. Campaign-finance tables do not fund USAspending.

Questions

How much AID spending is coded to California 32nd District (CA-32)?

USAspending.gov records $122,590,167 in Agency for International Development obligations with California 32nd District (CA-32) place of performance across 29 awards. That is an obligation aggregate for the district-agency pair, not an outlay and not California's complete federal ledger.

Does 29 awards mean 29 overseas missions or implementers?

No. 29 is an award-action count and can include modifications. Unique vendors are not published. Average obligation is about $4,227,247.14 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical invoice. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Is this California's entire international-development total?

No. $122,590,167 is only the Agency for International Development slice tagged to California 32nd District (CA-32). California federal spending is the statewide parent. California 32nd District includes other awarding agencies in the same district. Mixing those books into this total would overstate the join.

Where is the live AID in California 32nd District table?

California 32nd District is the district parent. Agency for International Development is the agency hub. California federal spending is the California parent. All spending ties lists other pairs. Prefer those tables after later ingests; this page quotes Agency for International Development × CA-32 at $122,590,167.