Aging Research in California 50th District (CA-50)

CA-50 × 93.866 is an NIA join, not a senior-population ranking

This page is a join: Aging Research and California 50th District (CA-50). $567,026,624.58 is the obligation sum on awards that carry both the CFDA 93.866 tag and congressional-district place of performance CA-50. It is not California’s statewide Aging Research book, not the nationwide program total, and not an Area Agency on Aging budget or a senior-population ranking. California 50th District is the district parent. CFDA 93.866 is the program parent. Correlation is not causation.

207 is an award-action count. Modifications can add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished, and this page will not invent contractors. Dividing $567,026,624.58 by 207 yields about $2,739,259.06 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical R01 or a typical lab year. FEC contribution tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. The catalog line is AGING RESEARCH. Campus folklore is not a named PI list.

Aging Research as a catalog title, not an Area Agency budget

The official catalog title is AGING RESEARCH. SpendingVault does not grade California 50th District (CA-50) on Aging Research, backlog, or policy. $567,026,624.58 is an obligation sum, not a verdict. CFDA 93.866 without the district filter is the national hub; this packet has no national total, so none is quoted. Other NIH institute listings such as 93.859 remain outside $567,026,624.58.

NIH RePORTER, NIA program announcements, and clinical-trial registries are other series. They are not the 207 awards on USAspending.gov. Mixing a census from those files with this join would invent a per-unit dollar figure the packet does not support. NIA-portfolio and campus-research folklore is ordinary speech, not a packet field. Biomedical Research and Research Training on 93.859 is a sibling CA-50 join in this slice. Mixing NIA with NIGMS would invent a combined NIH figure. MO-01 also carries 93.866 on a different stamp.

California 50th District besides CFDA 93.866

California 50th District (CA-50) is the geography side. Place of performance CA-50 is a coding field in the award file. It does not prove residency of beneficiaries, students, patients, or vendors. California federal spending is the statewide parent and includes other districts. San Diego corridor speech does not locate every lab. Place-of-performance CA-50 is a coding field. A Aging Research award tagged to CA-49 or CA-51 is not here.

The district’s all-program obligation total is $36,686,940,294.44. $567,026,624.58 is the Aging Research slice of that book, about 1.5%. Remaining district dollars sit with other CFDAs on California 50th District, not inside this join. Quoting $567,026,624.58 as California 50th District (CA-50)’s entire federal book would drop every other catalog line.

Two hundred seven awards behind the CA-50 NIA total

207 awards against $567,026,624.58 implies about $2,739,259.06 per award. That mean is not a unit price and not a typical R01 or a typical lab year. Research project awards and competing continuations can dominate dollars while the row count stays at 207. 207 rows can include continuations and amendments. Treat the count as records in an aggregate, not as 207 finished projects or 207 people. All spending ties lists other district-by-program pairs on the same obligation metric.

Research obligations versus invoices already paid

An obligation is a recorded commitment. An outlay is a payment from the Treasury. $567,026,624.58 is the commitment figure. This packet has no outlay total and no fiscal-year split, so none is invented. Citing the figure as cash already spent in California 50th District (CA-50) over-reads the field. Do not rank California 50th District (CA-50) as a winner or loser versus other districts. Keep both sides in the citation: Aging Research (CFDA 93.866) and California 50th District (CA-50).

Budget documents from the San Diego research corridor as speech only and California appropriations answer other questions. They are not the source of this cell. If a chart mixes General Fund activity with CFDA 93.866 in CA-50, the chart has left the federal award series. Coastal San Diego County as speech, not a packet metro did not receive $567,026,624.58 as a named metro in this packet.

How to cite the 93.866 × CA-50 pair

Cite: Aging Research (CFDA 93.866) obligated $567,026,624.58 on 207 awards coded to California 50th District (CA-50), per USAspending.gov. Keep both keys. Keep the word obligations. Open California 50th District for the district rollup, CFDA 93.866 for the program rollup, California federal spending for California statewide spending, and All spending ties for other pairs. Later bulk files can move the dollars and the 207-award count; prefer those tables when the live overlay and this snapshot diverge. None of those links convert this cell into an Area Agency on Aging budget or a senior-population ranking, into outlays this packet omits, or into a contractor list.

Questions

How much Aging Research funding is obligated in California 50th District (CA-50)?

USAspending.gov records $567,026,624.58 in CFDA 93.866 obligations with California 50th District (CA-50) place of performance across 207 awards. That is a program × district join, not an outlay and not California’s full federal total.

Do 207 awards mean 207 local grant, lab,s?

No. 207 is an award-action count and can include modifications. Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $2,739,259.06 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical R01 or a typical lab year.

Is this California 50th District (CA-50)’s entire federal spending total?

No. $567,026,624.58 is only the Aging Research slice tagged to California 50th District (CA-50), about 1.5% of the district’s $36,686,940,294.44 all-program total. California federal spending is the statewide parent. Other CFDAs on California 50th District sit outside this join.

What share of CA-50 obligations is CFDA 93.866?

CFDA 93.866 accounts for about 1.5% of $36,686,940,294.44 in district-wide obligations on this packet. That share is $567,026,624.58 ÷ $36,686,940,294.44. It is not a ranking of California districts and not an outlay share.