Aging Research federal funding in Kansas

Kansas x 93.866 is an NIA research join, not a senior census

This page pairs CFDA 93.866, AGING RESEARCH, with Kansas place of performance. The join is an NIH National Institute on Aging research listing crossed with a state location field, not Kansas’s entire biomedical budget and not a census of older adults. SpendingVault sums tagged obligations: $182,911,612.92 on 75 awards. The extract does not list labs, principal investigators, or trial names. Treat the pair as a catalog intersection, not a ranking of which state has more need, and not a claim that 75 awards equal 75 laboratories or 75 clinical trials.

Other NIH listings — Alzheimer’s-specific titles, general medical research, or different institute codes — sit outside this total unless they also carry 93.866. Mixing those listings into $182,911,612.92 would invent a combined figure the packet never computed. Correlation between this obligation sum and the state’s older-adult population is not causation. Census age figures are not in the packet. Place of performance as Kansas locates the tagged awards; it does not deposit $182,911,612.92 in the state treasury. Lawrence-versus-Kansas City campus folklore is not a metro split in this packet. Kansas EQIP on this slice uses a different CFDA and a different agency family.

75 awards behind $182.9 million

Mean obligation is about $2,438,821.51 if $182,911,612.92 were divided evenly across 75 lines. That ratio is not a published R01 size and not a cost per paper. Award count is a row count, including possible continuations and modifications. It is not a count of labs, investigators, or older adults served.

Seventy-five lines are a mid-volume research file. Sort the Kansas 93.866 overlay by amount to see concentration. This page will not invent recipient names. Open Aging Research in Kansas for the stored table. Do not convert 75 into a map of Kansas campuses. The $182,911,612.92 total remains an obligation rollup on tagged awards. Inspect named lines rather than inferring a laboratory census.

Aging-research obligations are not papers already published

Research awards often obligate as grants are issued and draw as project years proceed. The $182,911,612.92 headline is the obligation sum, not a punch-list of publications and not a Treasury outlay total. No fiscal year is attached. A NIH reporter extract dated to a particular year is not automatically this join unless it uses CFDA 93.866, Kansas geography, and the obligation metric.

The listing title is Aging Research. This extract does not split basic from clinical research, and it does not split Alzheimer’s from other aging topics. Those cuts would require award documentation beyond dollars, 75 awards, CFDA 93.866, and Kansas. This page will not invent a share. Other HHS aging-services titles (nutrition, caregiver support) are other catalog rows.

What the Kansas 93.866 table omits

The extract has no labs, principal investigators, or trial names. Facts remain $182,911,612.92, 75 awards, CFDA 93.866, and Kansas. This page will not invent a ranking against other states’ 93.866 joins. EQIP on 10.912 in Kansas on this slice is an NRCS overlay, not an NIH subset.

Kansas federal spending and Kansas programs place 93.866 among other listings. CFDA 93.866 is the national catalog line. All spending ties indexes other CFDA x state pairs. Mixing those shelves would invent a share of federal spending the packet never computed. The $182,911,612.92 figure is the tagged pair only. Campaign-finance filings are a different public-record system; this join does not claim donations funded these obligations.

Where the 93.866 x Kansas overlay lives

Start with Aging Research in Kansas for the 75-award table behind $182,911,612.92. CFDA 93.866 is the nationwide listing. Kansas federal spending and Kansas programs give state context. All spending ties is the shelf for other program-by-state joins on the same obligation metric. Seventy-five awards totaling $182,911,612.92 remain a research-grant file, not a senior census. Investigator names and publication counts are not in this packet. The $182,911,612.92 total is the tagged pair only. USAspending.gov remains the source; SpendingVault republishes the join. If a later extract revises the rollup, this page’s facts will be stale until the packet is rebuilt. Do not annualize $182,911,612.92: no fiscal year is in the facts.

How to read the Kansas × CFDA 93.866 pair

A ties page exists because two tables meet. One table is the assistance listing (CFDA 93.866). The other is place of performance as Kansas. The headline $182,911,612.92 is the obligation sum on that intersection. It is not a forecast, not a budget request, and not an outlay. It is also not a claim that CFDA 93.866 caused Kansas’s economy to grow. Correlation between geography and a catalog code is the join — nothing more. Use the internal links to step off this pair. If you need award-level names, open the overlay rather than treating this narrative as a recipient directory.

Questions

How much Aging Research funding is obligated in Kansas?

USAspending.gov shows $182,911,612.92 in obligations for CFDA 93.866 with Kansas as place of performance, across 75 awards. The sum is a commitment total on assistance awards, not outlays and not Kansas’s full biomedical budget. Other listings are outside this join unless they also carry 93.866.

Do 75 awards mean 75 Kansas aging labs?

No. Award count is a row count of assistance awards and can include continuations and subprojects as USAspending stored them. It is not a lab or investigator census. See the Kansas 93.866 overlay for named lines. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Does this include Kansas EQIP conservation awards?

No. This page is CFDA 93.866, Aging Research. EQIP is CFDA 10.912 on a separate Kansas join. Those dollars are not inside $182,911,612.92 unless the award also carries 93.866. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Is $183 million already spent on Kansas aging studies?

Not on this metric. Obligations are recorded commitments on assistance awards. Outlays are payments from the Treasury. The $182,911,612.92 headline is the obligation rollup in SpendingVault’s extract. Publication counts and remaining balances are not published in this packet. This page does not offer medical advice.