Aging research obligations in Minnesota

Minnesota crossed with CFDA 93.866

CFDA 93.866 is titled AGING RESEARCH. Crossed with Minnesota place of performance, obligations sum to $703,299,654.60 on 291 awards. The national 93.866 hub includes other states. Minnesota’s spending hub includes other programs. Only this intersection is reported here. $703,299,654.60 is an obligation aggregate from USAspending.gov, not an outlay and not a count of gerontology labs in Rochester.

Two hundred ninety-one awards is a multi-project extramural pattern: NIA assistance often posts as hundreds of discrete records rather than one statewide block. The join does not name recipients. Packet facts are $703,299,654.60, 291 awards, MN, and 93.866. Correlation is not causation. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Keep NIA aging research and Minnesota together when reading $703,299,654.60.

93.866 is not Medicare in Minnesota

Medicare and Medicaid use different CFDA numbers. Mixing those series into $703,299,654.60 would invent a broader total than this cell contains. Facts available: Minnesota, CFDA 93.866, $703,299,654.60, 291 awards. Study titles, activity codes, and publication counts are unpublished.

The catalog title names aging research, not a ranking of academic medical centers. Dividing $703,299,654.60 by 291 yields about $2.42 million per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. 291 is not a lab or PI census.

Place of performance on the NIA tag

MN is the place-of-performance code. Awards billed to Minneapolis, Rochester, Duluth, or other in-state sites can share the tag. Awards coded to Wisconsin, Iowa, North Dakota, or South Dakota stay outside $703,299,654.60 even when activity later crosses those lines. The code does not convert $703.30 million into a campus map.

Minnesota federal spending is the all-program parent. 93.866 is one row on Minnesota programs. $703.30 million is not the state’s complete federal footprint. Open Aging Research in Minnesota for the filtered table, CFDA 93.866 for the catalog without a Minnesota filter, and All spending ties for other pairs. Do not add those parents into $703,299,654.60.

Reading 291 awards under $703.30 million

$703,299,654.60 ÷ 291 is about $2.42 million per award. That average is an extramural-project scale, not a per-patient cost, not a median. Net obligations can include downward modifications; the total shown is the aggregate in the facts. Treat 291 as a record count, not as 291 finished trials.

Without a transaction register, you cannot see how many of the 291 rows are continuations, renewals, or corrections. Later ingests can restate $703,299,654.60 without changing the join key of 93.866 and MN. USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $703,299,654.60 is the net total supplied in the facts. The pair remains NIA aging research plus Minnesota. Do not treat $703,299,654.60 as an outlay series.

What the NIA–Minnesota pair does not prove

A large 93.866 total tagged to Minnesota does not measure whether longevity rose, and it does not equal papers published. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Correlation is not causation. The headline remains $703,299,654.60 on 291 awards for NIA aging research in Minnesota.

Keep both sides of the join: Aging Research and Minnesota, obligations only. Do not annualize $703,299,654.60 without a year field—this packet publishes none. Do not treat 291 as a lab or PI census. Quote USAspending.gov and the overlay path rather than a gerontology story. Cite NIA aging research together with Minnesota whenever you reuse $703,299,654.60.

Using the 93.866–Minnesota overlay

The overlay target is the Minnesota × CFDA 93.866 table. Open Aging Research in Minnesota when you want the same $703,299,654.60 / 291-award cell in the site’s data chrome. CFDA 93.866 drops the Minnesota filter. Minnesota federal spending drops the CFDA filter. Minnesota programs lists other catalogs beside 93.866. All spending ties indexes other pairs.

This page exists because two tables meet: a CFDA program and a place-of-performance state. It does not exist to argue that Minnesota won or lost federal money, that donations paid for the awards, or that obligations equal cash. The pair is 93.866 plus MN. Obligations of $703,299,654.60 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 93.866 × MN pair. 291 remains an award-record count, not a person, facility, or project census.

Questions

How much aging research is obligated in Minnesota?

USAspending records $703,299,654.60 in CFDA 93.866 obligations with Minnesota place of performance on 291 awards. That is the pair total, not an outlay. Keep Aging Research and Minnesota together when citing $703,299,654.60.

Does 291 awards mean 291 Minnesota laboratories?

291 is a USAspending award-record count, not a lab or PI census. The implied mean is about $2.42 million per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. 291 is a record count, not a person or facility census.

Is this Minnesota’s total federal research spending?

No. This join is CFDA 93.866 only. Other NIH institute catalogs appear on separate Minnesota program pages. Nationwide 93.866 is not limited to Minnesota. Obligations of $703,299,654.60 are not outlays. The overlay is the live NIA aging research–Minnesota table.

Do these obligations equal research completed?

No. $703,299,654.60 is an obligation sum. Outlays are a different USAspending series. Drawdowns can lag the federal obligation. This packet has no outlay total. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 93.866 × MN pair.