Skip to main content
← All data ties

Aging Research in Missouri 1st District (MO-01)

Congressional district Missouri 1st District (MO-01) crossed with Aging Research (CFDA 93.866) yields $562,023,646.41 in USAspending.gov obligations across 133 awards. One hundred thirty-three aging-research rows against a $562,023,646.41 book sit on a $97,825,769,256.36 district parent — a modest NIA share because the denominator is large, still not a lab census. The pair is about 0.6% of the district’s $97,825,769,256.36 all-program obligation total in this extract. The dollars are obligations, not outlays.

Key figures

  • Aging Research in Missouri 1st District (MO-01): $562,023,646.41 across 133 awards.
  • About 0.6% of the district’s $97,825,769,256.36 all-program obligation total.
  • Average obligation per award is about $4,225,741.70 (ratio only).
  • The join is CFDA 93.866 × Missouri 1st District (MO-01) place of performance, not an Area Agency on Aging budget or a senior-population ranking.
  • Figures are USAspending obligations, not outlays.

MO-01 × 93.866 is an NIA join, not a senior ranking

This page is a join: Aging Research and Missouri 1st District (MO-01). $562,023,646.41 is the obligation sum on awards that carry both the CFDA 93.866 tag and congressional-district place of performance MO-01. It is not Missouri’s statewide Aging Research book, not the nationwide program total, and not an Area Agency on Aging budget or a senior-population ranking. Missouri 1st District is the district parent. CFDA 93.866 is the program parent. Correlation is not causation.

133 is an award-action count. Modifications can add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished, and this page will not invent contractors. Dividing $562,023,646.41 by 133 yields about $4,225,741.70 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical R01 or a typical lab year. FEC contribution tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. The catalog line is AGING RESEARCH. St. Louis folklore is not a named PI list.

Aging Research as a catalog title, not an AAA budget

The official catalog title is AGING RESEARCH. SpendingVault does not grade Missouri 1st District (MO-01) on Aging Research, backlog, or policy. $562,023,646.41 is an obligation sum, not a verdict. CFDA 93.866 without the district filter is the national hub; this packet has no national total, so none is quoted. Other NIH institute listings such as 93.859 remain outside $562,023,646.41.

NIH RePORTER, NIA program announcements, and clinical-trial registries are other series. They are not the 133 awards on USAspending.gov. Mixing a census from those files with this join would invent a per-unit dollar figure the packet does not support. NIA-portfolio and research-campus folklore is ordinary speech, not a packet field. CA-50 also carries 93.866 in this slice. Matching CFDA codes do not merge St. Louis dollars with San Diego dollars. This packet has no trial registry.

Missouri 1st District besides CFDA 93.866

Missouri 1st District (MO-01) is the geography side. Place of performance MO-01 is a coding field in the award file. It does not prove residency of beneficiaries, students, patients, or vendors. Missouri federal spending is the statewide parent and includes other districts. North-and-central core speech does not locate every lab. Place-of-performance MO-01 is a coding field. A Aging Research award tagged to MO-02 or IL-01 is not here.

The district’s all-program obligation total is $97,825,769,256.36. $562,023,646.41 is the Aging Research slice of that book, about 0.6%. Remaining district dollars sit with other CFDAs on Missouri 1st District, not inside this join. Quoting $562,023,646.41 as Missouri 1st District (MO-01)’s entire federal book would drop every other catalog line.

One hundred thirty-three awards behind the MO-01 NIA total

133 awards against $562,023,646.41 implies about $4,225,741.70 per award. That mean is not a unit price and not a typical R01 or a typical lab year. Research project awards and competing continuations can dominate dollars while the row count stays at 133. 133 rows can include continuations and amendments. Treat the count as records in an aggregate, not as 133 finished projects or 133 people. All spending ties lists other district-by-program pairs on the same obligation metric.

Research obligations versus invoices already paid

An obligation is a recorded commitment. An outlay is a payment from the Treasury. $562,023,646.41 is the commitment figure. This packet has no outlay total and no fiscal-year split, so none is invented. Citing the figure as cash already spent in Missouri 1st District (MO-01) over-reads the field. Do not rank Missouri 1st District (MO-01) as a winner or loser versus other districts. Keep both sides in the citation: Aging Research (CFDA 93.866) and Missouri 1st District (MO-01).

Budget documents from St. Louis as speech only and Missouri appropriations answer other questions. They are not the source of this cell. If a chart mixes General Fund activity with CFDA 93.866 in MO-01, the chart has left the federal award series. The St. Louis north-and-central core as speech, not a packet metro did not receive $562,023,646.41 as a named metro in this packet.

How to cite the 93.866 × MO-01 pair

Cite: Aging Research (CFDA 93.866) obligated $562,023,646.41 on 133 awards coded to Missouri 1st District (MO-01), per USAspending.gov. Keep both keys. Keep the word obligations. Open Missouri 1st District for the district rollup, CFDA 93.866 for the program rollup, Missouri federal spending for Missouri statewide spending, and All spending ties for other pairs. Later bulk files can move the dollars and the 133-award count; prefer those tables when the live overlay and this snapshot diverge. None of those links convert this cell into an Area Agency on Aging budget or a senior-population ranking, into outlays this packet omits, or into a contractor list.

Questions

How much Aging Research funding is obligated in Missouri 1st District (MO-01)?
USAspending.gov records $562,023,646.41 in CFDA 93.866 obligations with Missouri 1st District (MO-01) place of performance across 133 awards. That is a program × district join, not an outlay and not Missouri’s full federal total.
Do 133 awards mean 133 local grant, lab,s?
No. 133 is an award-action count and can include modifications. Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $4,225,741.70 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical R01 or a typical lab year.
Is this Missouri 1st District (MO-01)’s entire federal spending total?
No. $562,023,646.41 is only the Aging Research slice tagged to Missouri 1st District (MO-01), about 0.6% of the district’s $97,825,769,256.36 all-program total. Missouri federal spending is the statewide parent. Other CFDAs on Missouri 1st District sit outside this join.
Is $562,023,646.41 cash already spent in Missouri 1st District (MO-01)?
No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays are unpublished here. Treating $562,023,646.41 as checks already cleared in Missouri 1st District (MO-01) confuses those terms. Prefer Missouri 1st District if the live table moved.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to CFDA program. Obligations are not outlays.