Aging Research funding in Washington 7th District (WA-07)

Reading CFDA 93.866 inside WA-07

CFDA 93.866 and congressional district WA-07 meet here. $489,309,056.96 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Aging Research’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to Washington 7th District (WA-07), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split basic from clinical aging work and does not name campuses. 128 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a senior census, a clinic roster, or a named-investigator file.

This page reports an Aging Research (CFDA 93.866) catalog line, not a benefits ledger. The headline $489,309,056.96 sits beside a district-wide obligation total of $84,208,106,524.58; the 0.6% share is arithmetic on those two packet facts, not a ranking of Washington districts as winners or losers. District 90 and 98 placeholders are omitted from this harvest. Obligations are not outlays. NICHD research on Maryland 8th uses CFDA 93.865. That is a different NIH catalog, not this 93.866 cell. A 0.6% share is not a ranking of districts.

Program 93.866 without inventing a recipient pie

USAspending labels CFDA 93.866 as Aging Research. That catalog number produced $489,309,056.96 when crossed with Washington 7th District (WA-07) place of performance. The program-wide 93.866 hub does not require WA-07 geography. The district hub does not require Aging research. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 128 awards. The packet does not split basic from clinical aging work and does not name campuses.

Correlation is not causation: Washington 7th District (WA-07) did not “cause” $489,309,056.96 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 93.866 × WA-07 only. It is not a senior census, a clinic roster, or a named-investigator file. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

How Washington geography is coded on this join

Washington 7th District (WA-07) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list WA-07 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other Washington districts belong on those ties even when the CFDA is also 93.866. Washington 7th District (WA-07) is a numbered congressional place-of-performance code inside Washington. Other Washington districts are separate joins even when they reuse CFDA 93.866. Washington 7th District (WA-07) is a numbered place-of-performance geography inside Washington. Other Washington districts are not this join.

Washington federal spending shows how CFDA 93.866 sits beside other programs in the same state extract. $489,309,056.96 is one district-program column, not the state table. This packet does not split Washington 7th District (WA-07) by county, city, or census tract. Awards that carry a different CFDA stay on those other ties even if the work sounds related to Aging Research. The district-wide obligation total published here is $84,208,106,524.58; $489,309,056.96 is the Aging research slice of that denominator.

What the dollar figure is allowed to mean

USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $489,309,056.96 is that kind of sum for Aging Research inside WA-07 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same CFDA rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $489,309,056.96 as given.

Washington’s own budget is a separate ledger. Mixing it with the 128-row Aging research cell leaves USAspending.gov. Treat 128 as award records in the aggregate, not unique vendors. 128 is not a count of labs, trials, or investigators. Do not annualize without a year field in the packet. Do not per-capita or per-recipient the dollar total; those denominators are unpublished. The implied mean ($3,822,727.01) is a concentration statistic, not a typical NIH grant size or a posted per-study figure.

Parents of this tie: district, program, state

Cite USAspending.gov: Aging Research (CFDA 93.866) obligated $489,309,056.96 on 128 awards coded to Washington 7th District (WA-07). Name Aging Research and Washington 7th District (WA-07) together. Keep the obligation word. If Washington 7th District or CFDA 93.866 has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a senior census, a clinic roster, or a named-investigator file. 0.6% of $84,208,106,524.58 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score. NICHD research on Maryland 8th uses CFDA 93.865. That is a different NIH catalog, not this 93.866 cell. A 0.6% share is not a ranking of districts.

Keep Aging Research, Washington 7th District (WA-07), $489,309,056.96, and 128 awards together. All spending ties indexes other pairs. CFDA 93.866 is the 93.866 parent without a WA-07 filter. Washington federal spending is the Washington parent. Do not add those parents to this cell. Sharing a district with Aging research does not mean campaign donations funded these awards, and it does not convert obligations into outlays. This page reports one USAspending join.

Limits of the WA-07 × 93.866 snapshot

128 awards is a moderate research file. Investigators and campuses remain unpublished. A large row count makes a project split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $3,822,727.01) and the district share (0.6% of $84,208,106,524.58) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer Washington 7th District and CFDA 93.866 if the live tables moved.

Do not rank Washington 7th District (WA-07) as more Aging research-dependent than neighboring districts on the strength of this cell alone. Neighboring geographies have their own 93.866 ties with different dollar totals, or no published 93.866 cell in this harvest. This snapshot holds $489,309,056.96 and 128 only. All spending ties is the index, not an addend. Obligations are not outlays. Correlation is not causation.

Questions

How much Aging research spending is coded to Washington 7th District (WA-07)?

USAspending.gov lists $489,309,056.96 in Aging Research obligations across 128 awards with place of performance in Washington 7th District (WA-07). CFDA 93.866 × WA-07 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Washington’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 0.6% of the district’s published total ($84,208,106,524.58). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $3,822,727.01, a ratio of those two facts only.

Does $489,309,056.96 include every Aging research project in WA-07?

The packet publishes one CFDA rollup. The packet does not split basic from clinical aging work and does not name campuses. $489,309,056.96 is the combined obligation sum for CFDA 93.866 inside WA-07 coding. This page will not invent a project pie or name contractors. Open CFDA 93.866 and Washington 7th District to inspect parent tables. 128 remains an action count, not a count of labs, trials, or investigators.

Is $489,309,056.96 cash already paid in Washington 7th District (WA-07)?

No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $489,309,056.96 as checks already cleared in Washington 7th District (WA-07) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 128 awards. Prefer the live district and program hubs if the tables moved.

Do FEC donations fund these Aging research awards in WA-07?

No. FEC receipts and USAspending obligations are different datasets. Sharing Washington geography does not mean donations funded $489,309,056.96 in Washington 7th District (WA-07). This page reports USAspending.gov CFDA 93.866 crossed with place of performance WA-07. It does not report campaign finance.