Agricultural Conservation Easement Program funding in Mississippi
The Agricultural Conservation Easement Program (CFDA 10.931) shows $324,878,224.25 in USAspending.gov obligations with Mississippi as place of performance. Fifty-three awards carry that total. The join is a USDA NRCS easement listing crossed with a state location field, not Mississippi’s entire conservation or agriculture budget and not a census of acres. Montana’s ACEP overlay on this slice is a separate pair. The dollars are commitments, not Treasury outlays.
Key figures
- CFDA 10.931 in Mississippi shows $324,878,224.25 in USAspending obligations on 53 awards.
- Fifty-three awards are project-style rows, not an easement or acre census.
- The join is ACEP plus Mississippi place of performance, not WIC, DFAP, or VA nursing homes.
- The total is commitments, not easement deeds already recorded.
Mississippi x 10.931 is an ACEP join, not an acreage census
This page pairs CFDA 10.931, AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT PROGRAM, with Mississippi place of performance. ACEP, in program language, helps protect agricultural lands and wetlands through easements. SpendingVault sums tagged obligations: $324,878,224.25 on 53 awards. The extract does not list acres, easement types, or landowners. Treat the pair as a catalog intersection, not a ranking of which state conserves more land, and not a claim that 53 awards equal 53 farms.
Other USDA listings — WIC, DFAP on 10.984, or different easement titles — sit outside $324,878,224.25 unless they also carry 10.931. Mississippi’s VA state-home join on 64.015 is a VA overlay, not an NRCS subset. Mixing ACEP with WIC would invent a combined state figure the packet never computed. Correlation between this obligation sum and wetland loss is not causation. Land-cover figures are not in the packet. Place of performance as Mississippi locates the tagged awards; it does not deposit $324,878,224.25 in the state treasury.
53 awards behind $324.9 million
Mean obligation is about $6,129,777.82 if $324,878,224.25 were divided evenly across 53 lines. That ratio is not a published easement price and not a cost per acre. Award count is a row count, including possible continuations and modifications. It is not a count of easements, counties, or acres.
Fifty-three lines are scannable on the overlay. This page will not invent landowner names. Open Agricultural Conservation Easement Program in Mississippi for the stored table. Do not convert 53 into a map of Mississippi farms. The $324,878,224.25 total remains an obligation rollup on tagged awards, not easements already recorded. Inspect named lines rather than inferring enrolled acreage.
ACEP obligations are not easement deeds already recorded
Easement awards often obligate as projects close and draw as appraisals and closings proceed. The $324,878,224.25 headline is the obligation sum, not a punch-list of acres protected and not a Treasury outlay total. No fiscal year is attached. An NRCS ACEP signup table dated to a particular year is not automatically this join unless it uses CFDA 10.931, Mississippi geography, and the obligation metric.
The listing title is Agricultural Conservation Easement Program. This extract does not split Agricultural Land Easements from Wetland Reserve Easements, and it does not split Delta wetlands from upland farms. Those cuts would require award documentation beyond dollars, 53 awards, CFDA 10.931, and Mississippi. This page will not invent an easement-type share. DFAP on 10.984 is a different USDA overlay.
What the Mississippi ACEP table omits
The extract has no acreage, no per-acre price, and no county list. Facts remain $324,878,224.25, 53 awards, CFDA 10.931, and Mississippi. This page will not invent a ranking against other states’ 10.931 joins, including Montana’s separate overlay. ALE and WRE can both sit in the file; the extract does not label them.
Mississippi federal spending and Mississippi programs place 10.931 among other listings. CFDA 10.931 is the national catalog line. All spending ties indexes other CFDA x state pairs. Mixing those shelves would invent a share of USDA spending the packet never computed. The $324,878,224.25 figure is the tagged pair only. Fifty-three awards remain a project file, not an acreage ranking.
Where the 10.931 x Mississippi overlay lives
Start with Agricultural Conservation Easement Program in Mississippi for the 53-award table behind $324,878,224.25. CFDA 10.931 is the nationwide listing. Mississippi federal spending and Mississippi programs give state context. All spending ties is the shelf for other program-by-state joins on the same obligation metric. Fifty-three awards totaling $324,878,224.25 remain a project-style administrative file, not an acreage census. Landowner names and per-acre prices are not in this packet. Easement-type splits are omitted because they are not in the facts. The $324,878,224.25 total is the tagged pair only.
Questions
- How much ACEP funding is obligated in Mississippi?
- USAspending.gov shows $324,878,224.25 in obligations for CFDA 10.931 with Mississippi as place of performance, across 53 awards. The sum is a commitment total on assistance awards, not outlays and not Mississippi’s full conservation budget. Other USDA listings are outside this join unless they also carry 10.931.
- Do 53 awards mean 53 Mississippi easements?
- No. Award count is a row count of assistance awards and can include continuations. It is not an easement or acre census. The packet does not name landowners. See the Mississippi 10.931 overlay for named lines as USAspending stored them.
- Does this include WIC or DFAP in Mississippi?
- No. This page is CFDA 10.931, Agricultural Conservation Easement Program. WIC sits on 10.557 and Discrimination Financial Assistance on 10.984 as separate joins. Those dollars are not inside $324,878,224.25 unless the award also carries 10.931. The extract has no acreage table.
- Is $325 million already spent on Mississippi easements?
- Not on this metric. Obligations are recorded commitments on assistance awards. Outlays are payments from the Treasury. The $324,878,224.25 headline is the obligation rollup in SpendingVault’s extract. Closing draws and remaining balances are not published in this packet.
USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.