Agricultural Conservation Easement Program in New Hampshire

How CFDA 10.931 meets New Hampshire

New Hampshire as place of performance, Agricultural Conservation Easement Program as the CFDA listing: 33 records summing to $82,936,650.29. It is not a farm-acre census, an easement deed list, or a named-landowner roster. A large cell is easy to misread as named recipients; this packet publishes none. Campaign-finance filings do not pay these awards. Correlation is not causation.

Agricultural Conservation Easement Program in New Hampshire is the both-keys table. CFDA 10.931 drops geography. New Hampshire federal spending drops the catalog. New Hampshire programs is the New Hampshire program index. All spending ties is the ties index. Use the overlay when both keys must stay on.

ACEP in New Hampshire, not a regional easement rollup

Official title: AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT PROGRAM. Mixing ACEP New Hampshire with other conservation catalog lines that use different CFDA numbers would invent a broader total. Facts available: New Hampshire, CFDA 10.931, $82,936,650.29, 33 awards. AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT PROGRAM in New Hampshire is a different cell from the Vermont ACEP overlay even though both use CFDA 10.931. Thirty-three awards here are New Hampshire place-of-performance records, not a New England rollup. The join does not name landowners, list deeds, or convert dollars into acres. Do not add a Vermont ACEP total into this cell.

New Hampshire place of performance on 10.931

NH excludes Vermont, Maine, and Massachusetts. Concord, Keene, or Lancaster folklore is a coding conversation, not a packet field. The geography tag does not convert $82,936,650.29 into a local scorecard. Neighbor-state joins for CFDA 10.931 are other pages.

Thirty-three awards, not thirty-three named farms

33 award actions sit behind $82,936,650.29. That row count can mix large instruments with smaller modifications. It is not 33 farms, towns, or easement deeds. Dividing $82,936,650.29 by 33 yields about $2,513,231.83 per award on average.

What ACEP in New Hampshire omits

Keep $82,936,650.29 labeled as obligations in New Hampshire for Agricultural Conservation Easement Program. It is not a Vermont ACEP twin or a town-plan map. Outlays are unpublished. No fiscal year is published in this packet, so this page does not invent one.

Paths /states/nh/programs/10.931/, /programs/10.931/, /states/nh/, /states/nh/programs/, and /ties/ keep the same unit. A later ingest can restate $82,936,650.29 without changing the join definition of CFDA 10.931 × NH. Keep Agricultural Conservation Easement Program and New Hampshire together when citing $82,936,650.29. CFDA 10.931 lists 33 award records on this NH join. Obligations of $82,936,650.29 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this CFDA 10.931 × NH pair. Do not add parent hubs into this state-program cell. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Unique recipients remain unpublished on this Agricultural Conservation Easement Program New Hampshire join. Agency splits are omitted from this packet. Quote CFDA 10.931, New Hampshire, and $82,936,650.29 in one sentence. The New Hampshire programs index and All spending ties index are larger than this cell. A later USAspending ingest can restate $82,936,650.29 without changing the join keys. This page is not a farm-acre census, an easement deed list, or a named-landowner roster. 33 award records are not 33 farms, towns, or easement deeds. Mean dollars per action remain about $2,513,231.83 if you divide those two facts. NH is place of performance, not a split of Concord, Keene, or Lancaster. Keep Agricultural Conservation Easement Program and New Hampshire together when citing $82,936,650.29. CFDA 10.931 lists 33 award records on this NH join. Obligations of $82,936,650.29 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this CFDA 10.931 × NH pair. Do not add parent hubs into this state-program cell. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Unique recipients remain unpublished on this Agricultural Conservation Easement Program New Hampshire join. Agency splits are omitted from this packet. Quote CFDA 10.931, New Hampshire, and $82,936,650.29 in one sentence.

Questions

How much ACEP funding is obligated in New Hampshire?

USAspending.gov records $82,936,650.29 in CFDA 10.931 obligations with New Hampshire place of performance on 33 awards. That is the pair total, not an outlay and not a farm-acre census, an easement deed list, or a named-landowner roster. Keep Agricultural Conservation Easement Program and New Hampshire together when citing $82,936,650.29.

Do 33 awards mean 33 New Hampshire farms?

No. 33 is a USAspending award-record count, not 33 farms, towns, or easement deeds. The implied mean is about $2,513,231.83 per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. Obligations of $82,936,650.29 are not outlays. USAspending.gov remains the source for this 10.931 × NH pair.

Can this total be added to Vermont ACEP?

No. $82,936,650.29 is only the CFDA 10.931 × New Hampshire cell. Other catalogs appear on separate New Hampshire program pages. Nationwide 10.931 is not limited to New Hampshire. Mixing this listing with other conservation catalog lines that use different CFDA numbers would invent a larger total.

Where is the live 10.931 × New Hampshire table?

Agricultural Conservation Easement Program in New Hampshire is the overlay at /states/nh/programs/10.931/. CFDA 10.931 is /programs/10.931/. New Hampshire federal spending is /states/nh/. New Hampshire programs is /states/nh/programs/. All spending ties is /ties/. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 10.931 × NH pair.