Agricultural Conservation Easement Program in Vermont

What the 10.931–Vermont join records

CFDA 10.931 crossed with VT is the definition of this page. $88,439,479.54 is the obligation aggregate from USAspending.gov. It is not a farm-acre census, an easement deed list, or a named-landowner roster. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these awards. Correlation is not causation.

Agricultural Conservation Easement Program in Vermont holds both keys. CFDA 10.931 is the program hub. Vermont federal spending is Vermont federal spending. Vermont programs is Vermont programs. All spending ties is all spending ties. Parent pages are larger on purpose.

ACEP as a catalog line, not a deed registry

The catalog title is AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT PROGRAM. $88,439,479.54 does not measure an EQIP twin or a town-plan map. Mixing this listing with other conservation catalog lines that use different CFDA numbers would invent a broader total than this cell contains. AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT PROGRAM is the catalog title. Forty-six awards in Vermont is a mid-count easement file. The join does not name landowners, split agricultural from wetland easements beyond the title, or convert dollars into conserved acres. A New Hampshire ACEP overlay is a different pair even when a watershed crosses the border.

Vermont place of performance on 10.931

Awards billed to Montpelier, Burlington, or Rutland can share VT. Awards coded to New Hampshire, New York, and Massachusetts stay out. Vermont is not ranked as a winner or loser. The geography tag is a filter, not a scorecard.

Forty-six awards, not forty-six named farms

Forty-six awards is a record count, not 46 farms, towns, or easement deeds. About $1,922,597.38 per award is a quotient, not a typical ACEP Vermont payment. Unique recipients stay unpublished. Net obligations can include downward modifications; $88,439,479.54 is the aggregate in the facts.

What ACEP in Vermont omits

Keep both sides of the join: Agricultural Conservation Easement Program and Vermont, obligations only. Do not annualize $88,439,479.54 without a year field — this packet publishes none. Open /states/vt/programs/10.931/, /programs/10.931/, /states/vt/, /states/vt/programs/, and /ties/. Quote USAspending.gov rather than a story about a farm-acre census, an easement deed list, or a named-landowner roster. Keep Agricultural Conservation Easement Program and Vermont together when citing $88,439,479.54. CFDA 10.931 lists 46 award records on this VT join. Obligations of $88,439,479.54 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this CFDA 10.931 × VT pair. Do not add parent hubs into this state-program cell. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Unique recipients remain unpublished on this Agricultural Conservation Easement Program Vermont join. Agency splits are omitted from this packet. Quote CFDA 10.931, Vermont, and $88,439,479.54 in one sentence. The Vermont programs index and All spending ties index are larger than this cell. A later USAspending ingest can restate $88,439,479.54 without changing the join keys. This page is not a farm-acre census, an easement deed list, or a named-landowner roster. 46 award records are not 46 farms, towns, or easement deeds. Mean dollars per action remain about $1,922,597.38 if you divide those two facts. VT is place of performance, not a split of Montpelier, Burlington, or Rutland. Keep Agricultural Conservation Easement Program and Vermont together when citing $88,439,479.54. CFDA 10.931 lists 46 award records on this VT join. Obligations of $88,439,479.54 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this CFDA 10.931 × VT pair. Do not add parent hubs into this state-program cell. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Unique recipients remain unpublished on this Agricultural Conservation Easement Program Vermont join. Agency splits are omitted from this packet. Quote CFDA 10.931, Vermont, and $88,439,479.54 in one sentence. The Vermont programs index and All spending ties index are larger than this cell. A later USAspending ingest can restate $88,439,479.54 without changing the join keys. This page is not a farm-acre census, an easement deed list, or a named-landowner roster.

Questions

How much ACEP funding is obligated in Vermont?

USAspending.gov records $88,439,479.54 in CFDA 10.931 obligations with Vermont place of performance on 46 awards. That is the pair total, not an outlay and not a farm-acre census, an easement deed list, or a named-landowner roster. Keep Agricultural Conservation Easement Program and Vermont together when citing $88,439,479.54.

Do 46 awards mean 46 Vermont farms?

No. 46 is a USAspending award-record count, not 46 farms, towns, or easement deeds. The implied mean is about $1,922,597.38 per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. Obligations of $88,439,479.54 are not outlays. USAspending.gov remains the source for this 10.931 × VT pair.

Is this Vermont’s full federal conservation spend?

No. $88,439,479.54 is only the CFDA 10.931 × Vermont cell. Other catalogs appear on separate Vermont program pages. Nationwide 10.931 is not limited to Vermont. Mixing this listing with other conservation catalog lines that use different CFDA numbers would invent a larger total.

Where is the live 10.931 × Vermont table?

Agricultural Conservation Easement Program in Vermont is the overlay at /states/vt/programs/10.931/. CFDA 10.931 is /programs/10.931/. Vermont federal spending is /states/vt/. Vermont programs is /states/vt/programs/. All spending ties is /ties/. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 10.931 × VT pair.