Skip to main content
← All data ties

Agricultural Conservation Easement Program funding in Wyoming

Agricultural Conservation Easement Program (CFDA 10.931) shows $177,229,337 in USAspending.gov obligations with Wyoming as place of performance. Twenty-eight awards carry that total. The join is a USDA NRCS easement listing crossed with a state location field, not Wyoming’s entire conservation budget and not a census of acres. The dollars are commitments, not Treasury outlays.

Key figures

  • CFDA 10.931 in Wyoming shows $177,229,337 in USAspending obligations on 28 awards.
  • Twenty-eight awards are project-style rows, not an easement or acre census.
  • The join is ACEP plus Wyoming place of performance, not CRP or EQIP.
  • The total is commitments, not easement deeds already recorded.

Wyoming x 10.931 is an ACEP join, not an acreage census

This page pairs CFDA 10.931, AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT PROGRAM, with Wyoming place of performance. The join is a USDA NRCS easement listing crossed with a state location field, not Wyoming’s entire conservation budget and not a census of acres. SpendingVault sums tagged obligations: $177,229,337 on 28 awards. The extract does not list acres, easement types, or landowners. Treat the pair as a catalog intersection, not a ranking of which state has more need, and not a claim that 28 awards equal 28 ranches or 28 easements.

Other USDA listings — CRP, EQIP, or different easement titles — sit outside this total unless they also carry 10.931. Mixing those listings into $177,229,337 would invent a combined figure the packet never computed. Correlation between this obligation sum and grassland loss is not causation. Land-cover figures are not in the packet. Place of performance as Wyoming locates the tagged awards; it does not deposit $177,229,337 in the state treasury. Cheyenne-versus-Jackson Hole folklore is not a county split in this packet. Montana’s ACEP overlay elsewhere in the catalog is a different state key; do not add it here.

28 awards behind $177.2 million

Mean obligation is about $6,329,619.18 if $177,229,337 were divided evenly across 28 lines. That ratio is not a published easement price and not a cost per acre. Award count is a row count, including possible continuations and modifications. It is not a count of easements, counties, or acres.

Twenty-eight lines are scannable on the overlay. This page will not invent recipient names. Open Agricultural Conservation Easement Program in Wyoming for the stored table. Do not convert 28 into a map of Wyoming ranches. The $177,229,337 total remains an obligation rollup on tagged awards. Inspect named lines rather than inferring enrolled acreage.

ACEP obligations are not easement deeds already recorded

Easement awards often obligate as projects close and draw as appraisals and closings proceed. The $177,229,337 headline is the obligation sum, not a punch-list of acres protected and not a Treasury outlay total. No fiscal year is attached. A NRCS ACEP signup table dated to a particular year is not automatically this join unless it uses CFDA 10.931, Wyoming geography, and the obligation metric.

The listing title is Agricultural Conservation Easement Program. This extract does not split Agricultural Land Easements from Wetland Reserve Easements, and it does not split grasslands from cropland. Those cuts would require award documentation beyond dollars, 28 awards, CFDA 10.931, and Wyoming. This page will not invent a share. Airport Improvement on 20.106 in Wyoming is a DOT overlay.

What the Wyoming 10.931 table omits

The extract has no acres, easement types, or landowners. Facts remain $177,229,337, 28 awards, CFDA 10.931, and Wyoming. This page will not invent a ranking against other states’ 10.931 joins. Emergency Rental Assistance on 21.023 in Wyoming on this slice is a Treasury overlay, not an NRCS subset.

Wyoming federal spending and Wyoming programs place 10.931 among other listings. CFDA 10.931 is the national catalog line. All spending ties indexes other CFDA x state pairs. Mixing those shelves would invent a share of federal spending the packet never computed. The $177,229,337 figure is the tagged pair only. Campaign-finance filings are a different public-record system; this join does not claim donations funded these obligations.

Where the 10.931 x Wyoming overlay lives

Start with Agricultural Conservation Easement Program in Wyoming for the 28-award table behind $177,229,337. CFDA 10.931 is the nationwide listing. Wyoming federal spending and Wyoming programs give state context. All spending ties is the shelf for other program-by-state joins on the same obligation metric. Twenty-eight awards totaling $177,229,337 remain a project-style administrative file, not an acreage census. Landowner names and per-acre prices are not in this packet. The $177,229,337 total is the tagged pair only. USAspending.gov remains the source; SpendingVault republishes the join. If a later extract revises the rollup, this page’s facts will be stale until the packet is rebuilt. Do not annualize $177,229,337: no fiscal year is in the facts.

How to read the Wyoming × CFDA 10.931 pair

A ties page exists because two tables meet. One table is the assistance listing (CFDA 10.931). The other is place of performance as Wyoming. The headline $177,229,337 is the obligation sum on that intersection. It is not a forecast, not a budget request, and not an outlay. It is also not a claim that CFDA 10.931 caused Wyoming’s economy to grow. Correlation between geography and a catalog code is the join — nothing more. Use the internal links to step off this pair. If you need award-level names, open the overlay rather than treating this narrative as a recipient directory.

Questions

How much ACEP funding is obligated in Wyoming?
USAspending.gov shows $177,229,337 in obligations for CFDA 10.931 with Wyoming as place of performance, across 28 awards. The sum is a commitment total on assistance awards, not outlays and not Wyoming’s full conservation budget. Other listings are outside this join unless they also carry 10.931.
Do 28 awards mean 28 Wyoming easements?
No. Award count is a row count of assistance awards and can include continuations. It is not an easement or acre census. The packet does not name landowners. See the Wyoming 10.931 overlay for named lines as USAspending stored them.
Does this include EQIP or CRP in Wyoming?
No. This page is CFDA 10.931, Agricultural Conservation Easement Program. EQIP and CRP use different CFDA numbers. Those dollars are not inside $177,229,337 unless the award also carries 10.931. The extract has no acreage table. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.
Is $177 million already spent on Wyoming easements?
Not on this metric. Obligations are recorded commitments on assistance awards. Outlays are payments from the Treasury. The $177,229,337 headline is the obligation rollup in SpendingVault’s extract. Closing draws and remaining balances are not published in this packet.

USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.