Airport Improvement and related airport programs in New Hampshire

New Hampshire × CFDA 20.106 as an airport-capital cell

New Hampshire × CFDA 20.106 is the object this page measures. Airport Improvement Program, Infrastructure Investment And Jobs Act Programs, And Covid-19 Airports Programs shows $49,176,993.48 in USAspending.gov obligations on 22 awards coded to the state. It is not FAA facilities-and-equipment listings, and it is not an airport, runway, or passenger census.

Award count is a row count of assistance awards, including possible continuations and modifications. Mean obligation about $2,235,317.89 is $49,176,993.48 ÷ 22, not a typical airport grant and not a typical runway overlay. Airport capital awards across AIP, IIJA, and COVID airport programs can dominate the dollars.

Concord did not cause the total by appearing as NH. Matching 20.106 to New Hampshire is not a finding about passenger counts. FEC donations do not fund this cell. Open Airport Improvement Program, Infrastructure Investment And Jobs Act Programs, And Covid-19 Airports Programs in New Hampshire rather than treating this narrative as a recipient directory.

Airport Improvement as catalog language, not an airport census

USAspending stores the assistance listing as AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT AND JOBS ACT PROGRAMS, AND COVID-19 AIRPORTS PROGRAMS. SpendingVault republishes the New Hampshire intersection. No national Airport Improvement Program, IIJA programs, and COVID-19 airports programs total is in the packet, so none is invented. CFDA 20.106 is the unfiltered hub.

Separate measurement systems include FAA AIP grant announcements and state aviation-system plans. Combining those files with 22 rows would manufacture a homemade per-unit figure. Runway-overlay folklore is not a packet column.

New Hampshire's place-of-performance tag on 20.106

The statewide parent is New Hampshire federal spending. The program directory is New Hampshire programs. Both are wider than $49,176,993.48. FAA facilities-and-equipment listings appear as other joins.

Geography NH is a place-of-performance code. Awards billed through Concord can share the tag. Manchester did not receive $49,176,993.48 as a named metro appropriation. Neighbors (Vermont, Maine, or Massachusetts) are other pages.

AIP obligations are not pavement already poured

Commitments and payments are different series. $49,176,993.48 is the commitment rollup on tagged awards. This page will not convert it into cash already spent on Airport Improvement Program, IIJA programs, and COVID-19 airports programs.

Manchester-versus-Portsmouth stories are not an airport split. This packet names no airports. No fiscal-year series is published on this packet, so $49,176,993.48 will not be annualized.

How to cite Airport Improvement in New Hampshire

Cite USAspending.gov: Airport Improvement Program, Infrastructure Investment And Jobs Act Programs, And Covid-19 Airports Programs (CFDA 20.106) in New Hampshire, $49,176,993.48, 22 awards, obligations only. All spending ties is the shelf for other CFDA × state pairs.

The live overlay Airport Improvement Program, Infrastructure Investment And Jobs Act Programs, And Covid-19 Airports Programs in New Hampshire can refresh after this snapshot. Parent hubs are context, not addends. Keep both sides of the join in the same sentence.

What 22 New Hampshire airport-program rows will not prove

This page exists because two tables meet. It does not exist to argue that New Hampshire won or lost federal money. Correlation is not causation. 22 is not an airport, runway, or passenger census.

Manchester-versus-Portsmouth stories are not an airport split. This packet names no airports. Keep Airport Improvement Program, Infrastructure Investment And Jobs Act Programs, And Covid-19 Airports Programs, New Hampshire, $49,176,993.48, and 22 awards together in every reuse. Place of performance as NH locates the tagged awards; it does not prove every dollar stayed inside New Hampshire after obligation. Concord folklore is not a split of the 22 rows, and Manchester is not a named recipient of $49,176,993.48.

USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $49,176,993.48 is the net total supplied in the facts. Treat 22 as a record count in an aggregate, not as 22 finished program years. Award modifications can sit beside base records in the same row count. The mean of about $2,235,317.89 per record will mislead anyone who treats it as a typical airport grant and not a typical runway overlay.

Questions

How much Airport Improvement and related airport-program funding is obligated in New Hampshire?

USAspending.gov records $49,176,993.48 in CFDA 20.106 obligations across 22 awards coded to New Hampshire. That is a program × state join, not an outlay and not New Hampshire's full federal total. Keep both the program name and New Hampshire in any citation.

Do 22 awards mean 22 New Hampshire airports?

Award count is a row count. $49,176,993.48 ÷ 22 is about $2,235,317.89 per record as a mean, not a typical airport grant and not a typical runway overlay. Airport capital awards across AIP, IIJA, and COVID airport programs can dominate dollars. This packet does not list recipients. See Airport Improvement Program, Infrastructure Investment And Jobs Act Programs, And Covid-19 Airports Programs in New Hampshire for the stored table.

Is this New Hampshire's entire federal aviation book?

No. The $49,176,993.48 and 22 awards are USAspending.gov obligation records for CFDA 20.106 with a New Hampshire geography tag. FAA facilities-and-equipment and other DOT aviation listings use different CFDAs. Those dollars sit outside this join. Mixing those files with this join would invent a figure the packet does not support.

Where is the live New Hampshire × 20.106 overlay?

Airport Improvement Program, Infrastructure Investment And Jobs Act Programs, And Covid-19 Airports Programs in New Hampshire is the overlay. See New Hampshire federal spending, New Hampshire programs, CFDA 20.106, and All spending ties. Later bulk files override this snapshot. Keep the obligation label on $49,176,993.48. Do not invent a fiscal year.