Biomedical Research And Research Training in California 12th District (CA-12)

A two-sided USAspending join: NIGMS training and CA-12

CFDA 93.859 and congressional district CA-12 meet here. $355,171,200.13 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Biomedical Research And Research Training’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to California 12th District (CA-12), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split training from research-project awards and does not name campuses. 122 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a trainee census, a lab roster, or a named-investigator file.

Dividing $355,171,200.13 by 122 yields about $2,911,239.35 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical training grant or a posted per-trainee figure. 122 awards is a moderate training-and-research file. Trainees remain unpublished. California 16th is a different 93.859 stamp. Do not treat CA-12’s 93.859 cell as a synonym for every NIGMS training account nationwide. Open California 12th District for the district table without this program filter, CFDA 93.859 for CFDA 93.859 without the CA-12 filter, California federal spending for every program in the California extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $355,171,200.13.

Biomedical Research And Research Training as a CFDA tag, not a vendor list

USAspending labels CFDA 93.859 as Biomedical Research And Research Training. That catalog number produced $355,171,200.13 when crossed with California 12th District (CA-12) place of performance. The program-wide 93.859 hub does not require CA-12 geography. The district hub does not require NIGMS training. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 122 awards. The packet does not split training from research-project awards and does not name campuses.

Correlation is not causation: California 12th District (CA-12) did not “cause” $355,171,200.13 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 93.859 × CA-12 only. It is not a trainee census, a lab roster, or a named-investigator file. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

Geography for California 12th District (CA-12) on USAspending

California 12th District (CA-12) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list CA-12 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other California districts belong on those ties even when the CFDA is also 93.859. California 12th District (CA-12) is a numbered congressional place-of-performance code inside California. Other California districts are separate joins even when they reuse CFDA 93.859. California 12th District (CA-12) is not California 16th, which also hosts CFDA 93.859 beside NIAID and heart-research pairs.

Reading the obligation sum without converting it to cash

USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $355,171,200.13 is that kind of sum for Biomedical Research And Research Training inside CA-12 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same CFDA rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $355,171,200.13 as given.

California’s own budget is a separate ledger. Mixing it with the 122-row NIGMS training cell leaves USAspending.gov. Treat 122 as award records in the aggregate, not unique vendors. 122 is not a count of trainees, labs, or investigators. Do not annualize without a year field in the packet. Do not per-capita or per-recipient the dollar total; those denominators are unpublished. The implied mean ($2,911,239.35) is a concentration statistic, not a typical training grant or a posted per-trainee figure.

What a complete CA-12 citation includes

Cite USAspending.gov: Biomedical Research And Research Training (CFDA 93.859) obligated $355,171,200.13 on 122 awards coded to California 12th District (CA-12). Name Biomedical Research And Research Training and California 12th District (CA-12) together. Keep the obligation word. If California 12th District or CFDA 93.859 has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a trainee census, a lab roster, or a named-investigator file. 1.5% of $23,541,852,476.74 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score. California 11th hosts neuroscience (93.853) and heart research (93.837), not this NIGMS-style training catalog. Do not merge those NIH lines.

Using 1.5% and $2,911,239.35 without overclaiming

122 awards is a moderate training-and-research file. Trainees remain unpublished. California 16th is a different 93.859 stamp. A large row count makes a project split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $2,911,239.35) and the district share (1.5% of $23,541,852,476.74) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer California 12th District and CFDA 93.859 if the live tables moved.

Do not rank California 12th District (CA-12) as more NIGMS training-dependent than neighboring districts on the strength of this cell alone. Neighboring geographies have their own 93.859 ties with different dollar totals, or no published 93.859 cell in this harvest. This snapshot holds $355,171,200.13 and 122 only. All spending ties is the index, not an addend. Obligations are not outlays. Correlation is not causation.

Questions

How much NIGMS training spending is coded to California 12th District (CA-12)?

USAspending.gov lists $355,171,200.13 in Biomedical Research And Research Training obligations across 122 awards with place of performance in California 12th District (CA-12). CFDA 93.859 × CA-12 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not California’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 1.5% of the district’s published total ($23,541,852,476.74). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $2,911,239.35, a ratio of those two facts only.

Does $355,171,200.13 include every NIGMS training project in CA-12?

The packet publishes one CFDA rollup. The packet does not split training from research-project awards and does not name campuses. $355,171,200.13 is the combined obligation sum for CFDA 93.859 inside CA-12 coding. This page will not invent a project pie or name contractors. Open CFDA 93.859 and California 12th District to inspect parent tables. 122 remains an action count, not a count of trainees, labs, or investigators.

Is $355,171,200.13 cash already paid in California 12th District (CA-12)?

No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $355,171,200.13 as checks already cleared in California 12th District (CA-12) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 122 awards. Prefer the live district and program hubs if the tables moved.

Is California 12th District (CA-12) ranked against other California districts here?

No. This page does not rank California 12th District (CA-12) as a winner or loser. $355,171,200.13 and 122 describe one join. Neighboring districts have their own cells. District 90/98 placeholders are omitted. Cite Biomedical Research And Research Training and California 12th District (CA-12) together without a league table.