BRIC Building Resilient Infrastructure in Utah

FEMA CFDA 97.047 joined to Utah

CFDA 97.047 is titled Bric: Building Resilient Infrastructure And Communities. Filtered to Utah place of performance, obligations sum to $189,665,446.63 on 3 awards. The national CFDA 97.047 hub includes every state. Utah federal spending includes every program. This tie is the overlap — the pair, not a causal story. BRIC awards often concentrate in a few large mitigation projects. The packet does not name those projects or avoided-loss estimates.

Three awards against this dollar book is a concentrated filing pattern. A few instruments can dominate the mean; the packet does not name them. Readers sometimes treat a large CFDA–state total as if it were a budget line the state legislature passed. $189,665,446.63 is not that. It is the USAspending obligation sum on awards tagged 97.047 and UT. Correlation is not causation. Campaign-finance tables are a different dataset; donations do not fund these awards.

BRIC is not Individual Assistance or GI Bill

Hazard mitigation, public assistance, and other FEMA catalogs use different CFDA numbers. BRIC is this Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities cell. Packet facts are Utah, CFDA 97.047, $189,665,446.63, and 3 awards. Formula shares, recipient lists, and outcome scores are not in the facts. The catalog title names Bric: Building Resilient Infrastructure And Communities, not IA payments or a flood-map ranking.

The only numeric facts on this packet are $189,665,446.63, 3 awards, CFDA 97.047, program title Bric: Building Resilient Infrastructure And Communities, and geography UT/Utah. Any other dollar, year, recipient, or percentage would be invented. Trivial arithmetic is allowed: 3 awards into $189,665,446.63 is about $63.22 million per award. That quotient is a mean of records, not a typical household, student, patient, or BRIC unit.

Utah as a mitigation-project geography tag

Utah’s place-of-performance tag can cover a statewide award even when activity sits along the Wasatch Front. Salt Lake City and Provo are not columns. Awards coded to Idaho, Nevada, Colorado, or Arizona stay out. Place of performance UT is a two-letter code in the award file. It does not prove where every subcontract ran, and it does not convert $189,665,446.63 into a county map. Awards with a different state code are outside this cell even if people, patients, or riders cross the border.

Utah federal spending is the all-program parent. CFDA 97.047 is the national program page without the Utah filter. Utah programs lists other catalogs beside Bric: Building Resilient Infrastructure And Communities. $189,665,446.63 is not Utah’s complete federal footprint.

Three awards against the BRIC total

$189,665,446.63 ÷ 3 is about $63.22 million per award. That average is a ratio of two packet facts, not a median and not a posted unit price. With n = 3, a few large instruments can dominate, or many small actions can stack. Treat three as a record count in an aggregate, not as three finished projects. USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $189,665,446.63 is the net total supplied in the facts.

Without a transaction register on this page, you cannot see how many of the 3 rows are continuations, renewals, or corrections. Unique recipients are unpublished. Avoided-loss estimates and project names are unpublished. GI Bill, heart research, and Unemployment Insurance Utah cells use other CFDA numbers.

Hazard rankings the extract does not publish

An obligation is a legal commitment. An outlay is a payment. $189,665,446.63 is the former. This packet has no outlay total, no fiscal-year split, and no de-obligation history. Citing the figure as cash already cleared in Utah over-reads the field. Keep the obligation word when you quote Bric: Building Resilient Infrastructure And Communities in Utah. FEC filings do not pay USAspending cells. The join cannot say that Utah specialized in BRIC because of federal demand, or the reverse.

Parents of the Utah × 97.047 overlay

The overlay target is Bric: Building Resilient Infrastructure And Communities in Utah. Open that path for the same $189,665,446.63 / 3-award cell in the site’s data chrome. CFDA 97.047 drops the Utah filter. Utah federal spending drops the CFDA filter. Utah programs lists sibling catalogs. All spending ties is the directory of other pairs. None of those links convert the cell into IA payments or a flood-map ranking, into outlays this packet omits, or into a causal claim. Cite both sides: Bric: Building Resilient Infrastructure And Communities and Utah, $189,665,446.63, 3 awards, USAspending.gov, obligations only.

Questions

How much BRIC funding is obligated in Utah?

USAspending.gov records $189,665,446.63 in Bric: Building Resilient Infrastructure And Communities obligations (CFDA 97.047) with Utah place of performance across 3 awards. That is an obligation aggregate for the program–state pair, not an outlay and not Utah’s full federal book. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Does 3 awards mean 3 counties?

The extract lists 3 award actions totaling $189,665,446.63. Three awards against this dollar book is a concentrated filing pattern. A few instruments can dominate the mean; the packet does not name them. Average obligation per award is about $63.22 million, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical invoice. Unique recipients are not published on this packet.

Is this Utah’s full FEMA spending?

No. $189,665,446.63 is only the Bric: Building Resilient Infrastructure And Communities cell tagged to Utah. Other CFDA programs with Utah place of performance sit on Utah federal spending. Nationwide CFDA 97.047 is not limited to Utah. Mixing sibling catalogs into this total would overstate the join.

Where is the live BRIC-in-Utah table?

Bric: Building Resilient Infrastructure And Communities in Utah is the live table for this pair. CFDA 97.047 is the national program hub. Utah federal spending is the statewide parent. Utah programs indexes other catalogs. All spending ties lists other pairs. Prefer those tables after later USAspending ingests; this page quotes only 97.047 × UT at $189,665,446.63.