Skip to main content
← All data ties

Child Care and Development Block Grant obligations in Indiana

The Child Care and Development Block Grant (CFDA 93.575) shows $1,945,672,588 in USAspending.gov obligations coded to Indiana across 10 awards. The pair is a CCDF discretionary catalog line joined to place of performance, not a count of licensed slots and not a ranking of counties by subsidy use. Obligations are commitments, not outlays. The Indiana × 93.575 overlay holds the structured rows.

Key figures

  • CFDA 93.575 shows $1,945,672,588 in USAspending obligations in Indiana.
  • Award count is 10; implied mean about $195 million.
  • The join is program × place of performance, not a slot-count ranking.
  • Figures are obligations, not outlays.

Ten awards carry the Indiana CCDF discretionary cell

This tie keeps USAspending assistance where CFDA 93.575 meets Indiana place of performance. The dollar book is $1,945,672,588. The award count is 10. CCDF discretionary funds typically post as a small number of awards to the state lead agency, with additional actions possible for supplements or related assistance that still carry 93.575. Ten prime records do not mean ten counties received the entire book.

The join does not prove that Indiana’s labor-force participation, licensed-capacity inventory, or subsidy-payment rate caused $1,945,672,588. Those are other series. This packet does not split infant care from school-age care. Correlation is not causation.

A reader who treats the cell as Indiana’s full HHS obligation book has left the CFDA-by-state definition. The 10 figure is a record count, including modifications, not a count of children receiving subsidies.

A ten-row tape and a large mean

Ten awards under $1,945,672,588 imply a mean near $194,567,259 per award. State-level block-grant actions of this size often produce that kind of average. The packet has no median and no share sitting on the largest of the ten records.

Low award counts with high dollars are a CCDF filing pattern, not a map of providers. Cite both columns. USAspending.gov is the source; SpendingVault does not recast the mean as a typical voucher or center contract.

Indiana’s 93.575 cell versus Head Start or TANF

Indiana’s state hub stacks every CFDA with performance coded to the state. The Child Care and Development Block Grant is one HHS line; Head Start and TANF are different catalog numbers. $1,945,672,588 is not Indiana’s all-program total. The nationwide CFDA 93.575 page includes every state, so it is not this cell.

Place-of-performance on a state CCDF award usually sits on Indiana even when providers are local. This packet does not reallocate dollars to counties. Read the overlay as a coding view of 10 awards.

Obligations versus subsidy payments

The $1,945,672,588 figure is an obligation sum. Lead-agency drawdowns and provider payments can trail the federal obligation. SpendingVault does not publish a 93.575-in-Indiana outlay total in this packet. Mixing licensed-slot or quality-rating statistics with this award file leaves the USAspending series.

Cite the join as CFDA 93.575 × Indiana, $1,945,672,588, 10 awards, obligations only.

Tables behind the join

The Indiana × Child Care and Development Block Grant overlay is the table view. Recipient slices on that hub still sum toward $1,945,672,588 on 10 awards. The Indiana spending page and the CFDA 93.575 program page are the parents. The Indiana programs index and the ties index list other pairs.

None of those links convert the cell into slot counts or into outlays this packet omits.

What Indiana’s CCDF join is not

The Child Care and Development Block Grant in Indiana is not a ranking of counties by licensed slots and not a count of subsidy-receiving children. The $1,945,672,588 figure is the CFDA 93.575 × Indiana cell. Ten awards describe lead-agency filing, not ten counties. Infant, toddler, and school-age care that still carry 93.575 are not split in this packet.

Head Start and TANF are different HHS catalog numbers. A reader who stacks those cells with CCDF has left this join. Cite 93.575 and Indiana together, keep the obligation label, and keep the 10-award count. Provider payments can lag the federal obligation. The overlay is the live table.

Indiana’s CCDF cell also does not include provider-payment rates, quality-rating shares, or wait-list counts. Those series live with the lead agency. SpendingVault cites USAspending.gov obligations only: CFDA 93.575 × Indiana, $1,945,672,588, 10 awards. If a later extract revises the ten-row tape, the implied mean near $194,567,259 moves with it. Quote the packet facts and the overlay path rather than a slot-count story.

Keep both sides of the join in any citation: Child Care and Development Block Grant and Indiana, obligations only, ten awards on $1,945,672,588.

Questions

How much Child Care and Development Block Grant spending is in Indiana?
USAspending.gov shows $1,945,672,588 in CFDA 93.575 obligations coded to Indiana across 10 awards. The join uses the program number and Indiana place of performance. The total is obligations, not outlays.
Does 10 awards mean 10 counties got the money?
No. The extract counts 10 award records tagged to CFDA 93.575 and Indiana. CCDF discretionary funds often post at the state lead agency. The implied mean is about $194,567,259 per award.
Is $1.95 billion Indiana’s full federal spending?
No. $1,945,672,588 is only the Child Care and Development Block Grant cell. Other CFDA programs with Indiana place of performance sit on the statewide hub. Nationwide 93.575 is not limited to Indiana.
Do these obligations equal cash paid to providers?
No. $1,945,672,588 is an obligation sum. Outlays are a different USAspending series. Subsidy payments can lag the federal obligation.

USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.