Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund federal funding in Alabama
Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund (CFDA 93.596) shows $535,597,027.21 in USAspending.gov obligations with Alabama as place of performance. Twenty awards carry that total — a short list of large assistance rows, not twenty child-care centers. The join is an HHS CCDF listing crossed with a state location field, not Alabama's entire human-services budget. The dollars are commitments, not Treasury outlays.
Key figures
- CFDA 93.596 in Alabama shows $535,597,027.21 in USAspending obligations on 20 awards.
- The listing is CCDF mandatory and matching funds, not Alabama's full child-care budget.
- Twenty awards are rows, not a provider or child census.
- The total is commitments, not tuition paid or a slot ranking.
Alabama x 93.596 is a CCDF matching join, not a slot census
This page pairs CFDA 93.596, CHILD CARE MANDATORY AND MATCHING FUNDS OF THE CHILD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND, with Alabama place of performance. The listing covers mandatory and matching CCDF funds that help states subsidize child care for eligible families, not Head Start and not a discretionary CCDF stream if it uses a different CFDA number. SpendingVault sums tagged obligations: $535,597,027.21 on 20 awards. The extract does not list providers, children, or counties. Treat the pair as a catalog intersection, not a ranking of which state subsidizes more care, and not a claim that 20 awards equal 20 agencies.
Other HHS listings — discretionary CCDF, TANF, or Head Start — sit outside $535,597,027.21 unless they also carry 93.596. Mixing matching funds with those codes would invent a combined child-care figure the packet never computed. Correlation between this obligation sum and licensed-slot counts is not causation. Slot counts are not in the packet. Place of performance as Alabama locates the tagged awards; it does not deposit $535,597,027.21 in provider bank accounts.
20 awards behind $535.6 million
Mean obligation is about $26,779,851 if $535,597,027.21 were divided evenly across 20 lines. That ratio is not a published grant size. Formula-style CCDF awards often post as a handful of rows to a state lead agency. Award count is a row count, including possible continuations. It is not a count of counties, providers, or children.
Twenty lines are scannable on the overlay. This page will not invent the lead agency name. Open Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund in Alabama for the stored table. Do not convert 20 into a map of Alabama child-care centers. The $535,597,027.21 total remains an obligation rollup on tagged awards, not subsidies issued to families. Inspect named lines rather than inferring a caseload.
CCDF matching obligations are not tuition already paid
Formula child-care awards often obligate in annual or multi-year payments and draw on a state fiscal calendar. The $535,597,027.21 headline is the obligation sum, not a punch-list of slots filled and not a Treasury outlay total. No fiscal year is attached. A CCDF allocation table dated to a particular year is not automatically this join unless it uses CFDA 93.596, Alabama geography, and the obligation metric.
The listing title is Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund. This extract does not split mandatory from matching shares, and it does not split infant care from school-age care. Those cuts would require award documentation beyond dollars, 20 awards, CFDA 93.596, and Alabama. This page will not invent a share.
What the Alabama CCDF table omits
The extract has no child count, no provider list, and no county table. Facts remain $535,597,027.21, 20 awards, CFDA 93.596, and Alabama. This page will not invent a ranking against other states' 93.596 joins. Rural and urban providers can both sit behind the lead agency; the extract does not label them.
Alabama federal spending and Alabama programs place 93.596 among other listings. CFDA 93.596 is the national catalog line. All spending ties indexes other CFDA x state pairs. Mixing those shelves would invent a share of HHS spending the packet never computed. The $535,597,027.21 figure is the tagged pair only.
Where the 93.596 x Alabama overlay lives
Start with Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund in Alabama for the 20-award table behind $535,597,027.21. CFDA 93.596 is the nationwide listing. Alabama federal spending and Alabama programs give state context. All spending ties is the shelf for other program-by-state joins on the same obligation metric. Twenty awards are formula-style rows, not a child census. Enrollment and provider names are not in this packet.
Readers who need a different program or a different state should leave this URL rather than adding numbers by hand. The $535,597,027.21 figure is the tagged CFDA 93.596 × Alabama pair only. USAspending.gov remains the source; SpendingVault republishes the join. Place of performance is a geography tag on awards, not proof that every dollar stayed inside Alabama after obligation. If a later extract revises the rollup, this page's facts will be stale until the packet is rebuilt. Do not annualize $535,597,027.21 into a per-year run rate: no fiscal year is in the facts.
How to read the Alabama × CFDA 93.596 pair
A ties page exists because two tables meet. One table is the assistance listing (CFDA 93.596). The other is place of performance as Alabama. The headline $535,597,027.21 is the obligation sum on that intersection. It is not a forecast, not a budget request, and not an outlay. It is also not a claim that CFDA 93.596 caused Alabama's economy to grow, or that Alabama caused CFDA 93.596 awards to exist. Correlation between geography and a catalog code is the join — nothing more.
Use the internal links to step off this pair: the statewide spending shelf, the national program listing, the state's other programs, and the ties index. Each of those pages uses the same obligation metric unless a page says otherwise. If you need award-level names, open the overlay or the stored table rather than treating this narrative as a recipient directory. If you need a different metric — outlays, current-year only, or a different geography — that metric is not in this packet.
Questions
- How much CCDF matching funding is obligated in Alabama?
- USAspending.gov shows $535,597,027.21 in obligations for CFDA 93.596 with Alabama as place of performance, across 20 awards. The sum is a commitment total on assistance awards, not outlays and not Alabama's full child-care budget. Other HHS listings are outside this join unless they also carry 93.596.
- Do 20 awards mean 20 Alabama child-care agencies?
- No. Award count is a row count of assistance awards and can include annual runs and continuations. It is not an agency, provider, or child census. The packet does not name agencies. See the Alabama 93.596 overlay for named lines as USAspending stored them.
- Is this Alabama's entire federal child-care funding?
- No. The join is CFDA 93.596, Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund, crossed with Alabama place of performance. Discretionary CCDF, Head Start, and TANF use different listings. Those dollars are not inside $535,597,027.21 unless the award also carries 93.596.
- Is $536 million already paid to Alabama child-care providers?
- Not on this metric. Obligations are recorded commitments on assistance awards. Outlays are payments from the Treasury. The $535,597,027.21 headline is the obligation rollup in SpendingVault's extract. Draws and remaining balances are not published in this packet.
USAspending.gov CFDA program aggregates by place of performance state. Obligations are not outlays.