CCDF mandatory and matching funds obligations in Arizona

What the 93.596–Arizona join is

CFDA 93.596 is titled CHILD CARE MANDATORY AND MATCHING FUNDS OF THE CHILD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND. Filtered to Arizona place of performance, obligations sum to $813,761,127.61 on 110 awards. The national CCDF matching hub has no Arizona filter. The Arizona spending hub has no CFDA filter. This tie is the intersection. $813,761,127.61 is an obligation aggregate from USAspending.gov, not an outlay and not a count of subsidized children in Phoenix or Tucson.

One hundred ten awards is a mixed state-and-local pattern: CCDF mandatory and matching funds can post as more records than the discretionary block grant. The join does not name DES, list counties, or count subsidized children. Packet facts stop at $813,761,127.61, 110 awards, AZ, and 93.596.

93.596 is not CCDBG discretionary

Child Care and Development Block Grant (CFDA 93.575) is a different catalog. Mixing discretionary CCDBG into $813,761,127.61 would invent a broader child-care total than this cell contains. Head Start (93.600) is another number still. Facts available: Arizona, CFDA 93.596, $813,761,127.61, 110 awards. Copays, quality ratings, and provider addresses are not in the facts.

The catalog title names Child Care Mandatory and Matching Funds of the CCDF, not a ranking of county wait lists. Dividing $813,761,127.61 by 110 yields about $7.40 million per award—smaller than a twenty-award block because the count is higher. Unique recipients are unpublished. 110 is not a count of providers.

Arizona geography on the CCDF matching tag

AZ is the place-of-performance code. Awards billed to Phoenix, Tucson, or another in-state address can share the tag. Awards coded to California, New Mexico, Nevada, or Utah stay outside $813,761,127.61 even when a commuting parent crosses the border. The code does not convert $813.8 million into a county slot map.

Arizona federal spending is the all-program parent. 93.596 is one row on Arizona programs. $813.8 million is not the state’s complete federal footprint. Open Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund in Arizona for the filtered table, CFDA 93.596 for 93.596 without an Arizona filter, and All spending ties for other pairs. Do not add those parents into $813,761,127.61.

Reading 110 awards under $813.8 million

$813,761,127.61 ÷ 110 is about $7.40 million per award. That average is a matching-fund scale, not a typical family copay. It is not a median. Net obligations can include downward modifications; the total shown is the aggregate in the facts. Treat 110 as a record count, not as 110 finished provider contracts.

USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $813,761,127.61 is the net total supplied in the facts. Without a transaction register, you cannot see how many of the 110 rows are continuations, renewals, or corrections. Later ingests can restate $813,761,127.61 without changing the join key of 93.596 and AZ.

What the CCDF matching–Arizona pair does not prove

A large 93.596 total tagged to Arizona does not measure whether parent copays fell, and it does not equal seats filled. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Correlation is not causation. The headline remains $813,761,127.61 on 110 awards for CCDF mandatory and matching funds in Arizona.

Keep both sides of the join: Child Care Mandatory and Matching Funds and Arizona, obligations only. Do not annualize $813,761,127.61 without a year field—this packet publishes none. Do not treat 110 as a provider census. Quote USAspending.gov and the overlay path rather than a workforce story.

Using the CCDF matching–Arizona overlay

The overlay target is the Arizona × CFDA 93.596 table. Open Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund in Arizona when you want the same $813,761,127.61 / 110-award cell in the site’s data chrome. CFDA 93.596 drops the Arizona filter. Arizona federal spending drops the CFDA filter. Arizona programs lists other catalogs beside 93.596. All spending ties indexes other pairs.

This page exists because two tables meet: a CFDA program and a place-of-performance state. It does not exist to argue that Arizona won or lost federal money, that donations paid for the awards, or that obligations equal cash. The pair is 93.596 plus AZ. Obligations of $813,761,127.61 are not outlays.

Questions

How much CCDF mandatory and matching funding is obligated in Arizona?

USAspending records $813,761,127.61 in CFDA 93.596 obligations with Arizona place of performance on 110 awards. That is the pair total, not an outlay and not discretionary CCDBG. Keep Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund and Arizona together when citing $813,761,127.61.

Is this the same as the Child Care Block Grant in Arizona?

No. Mandatory and matching CCDF funds are CFDA 93.596. The discretionary Child Care and Development Block Grant uses CFDA 93.575. Mixing those catalogs would invent a total larger than $813,761,127.61. 110 is a record count, not a person or facility census.

Does 110 awards mean 110 providers?

110 is a USAspending award-record count, not a provider census. The implied mean is about $7.40 million per award. Unique recipients and slot counts are unpublished. Obligations of $813,761,127.61 are not outlays. The overlay is the live Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund–Arizona table.

Is $813.8 million Arizona’s full federal child-care spend?

No. $813,761,127.61 is only the 93.596 × Arizona cell. CCDBG, Head Start, and other catalogs appear on separate Arizona program pages. Nationwide 93.596 is not limited to Arizona. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 93.596 × AZ pair.