CCDF mandatory and matching funds in Nebraska

Nebraska’s 93.596 cell is a join, not a subsidy ledger

CFDA 93.596 is titled CHILD CARE MANDATORY AND MATCHING FUNDS OF THE CHILD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND. Crossed with Nebraska place of performance, the obligation sum is $233,765,481.32 on 31 awards. The national CCDF matching hub includes other states. Nebraska’s spending hub includes other programs. Only this intersection is reported here. $233,765,481.32 is an obligation aggregate from USAspending.gov, not an outlay and not a count of subsidized children in Omaha or Lincoln.

Discretionary Child Care and Development Block Grant funding uses a different CFDA number. Mixing that catalog into $233,765,481.32 would invent a broader child-care total than this cell contains. Packet facts are $233,765,481.32, 31 awards, NE, and 93.596. Correlation is not causation.

Thirty-one awards under Nebraska CCDF matching

Thirty-one awards against $233,765,481.32 yield a simple mean near $7.54 million. The facts do not publish a median, a range, or unique recipients. 31 is a record count in an aggregate, not 31 counties and not 31 licensed centers. A state lead agency can post multiple instruments across modifications.

Treat the mean as arithmetic, not as a typical local office budget. Without a transaction register on this page, you cannot see whether a row is a continuation, renewal, or correction. Unique recipient names are unpublished. Downward modifications, if they exist in the raw file, are already netted into the total supplied in the facts.

Nebraska geography on the 93.596 tag

NE is the place-of-performance code. A statewide matching award can still appear as records tagged to Lincoln or another in-state address. Awards coded to Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, South Dakota, Wyoming, or Colorado stay outside $233,765,481.32 even when a commuting family crosses those lines.

Nebraska federal spending is the all-program parent. 93.596 is one row on Nebraska programs. $233.8 million is not the state’s complete federal footprint. Open Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund in Nebraska for the filtered table, CFDA 93.596 for 93.596 without a Nebraska filter, and All spending ties for other pairs. Do not add those parents into $233,765,481.32.

What CCDF matching in Nebraska does not prove

A large 93.596 total tagged to Nebraska does not measure wait lists, copayments, or provider wages. It does not equal subsidies paid to families. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. The headline remains $233,765,481.32 on 31 awards for CCDF mandatory and matching funds in Nebraska.

Keep both sides of the join: Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund and Nebraska, obligations only. Do not annualize $233,765,481.32 without a year field—this packet publishes none. Quote USAspending.gov and the overlay path rather than a child-care-supply story.

Using the Nebraska CCDF matching overlay

The overlay target is the Nebraska × CFDA 93.596 table. Open Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund in Nebraska when you want the same $233,765,481.32 / 31-award cell in the site’s data chrome. CFDA 93.596 drops the Nebraska filter. Nebraska federal spending drops the CFDA filter. Nebraska programs lists other catalogs beside CCDF matching. All spending ties indexes other pairs.

This page exists because two tables meet: a CFDA program and a place-of-performance state. It does not exist to rank Nebraska, to name providers, or to treat obligations as cash. The pair is 93.596 plus NE. Obligations of $233,765,481.32 are not outlays. Cite CCDF mandatory and matching funds together with Nebraska whenever you reuse $233,765,481.32. 31 remains an award-record count on USAspending.gov. The overlay path is the live table for this 93.596 × NE cell. Later bulk files can restate $233,765,481.32 without changing the join key.

Limits of the packet facts for Nebraska 93.596

The packet publishes four numbers and two labels: $233,765,481.32, 31 awards, Nebraska, and CFDA 93.596. It does not publish fiscal year, unique recipients, slot counts, or outlays. Provider names are unpublished and are not invented here.

Researchers who need award-level rows should open the overlay table and USAspending.gov rather than stretch $233,765,481.32 into a child-care evaluation. The join is a filter, not a causal claim. FEC files do not explain the 31 awards. Keep CCDF mandatory and matching funds named with Nebraska in every reuse of $233,765,481.32. AwardCount stays 31 until a new ingest revises it.

Questions

How much CCDF mandatory and matching funding is obligated in Nebraska?

USAspending records $233,765,481.32 in CFDA 93.596 obligations with Nebraska place of performance across 31 awards. That is the pair total, not an outlay and not a slot count. Keep CCDF mandatory and matching funds and Nebraska together when citing $233,765,481.32.

Is this Nebraska’s entire Child Care and Development Fund total?

No. This join is CFDA 93.596 only. Discretionary CCDF and other HHS catalogs appear on separate Nebraska program pages. Nationwide 93.596 is not limited to Nebraska. Obligations of $233,765,481.32 are not outlays.

Does 31 awards mean 31 Nebraska child-care centers?

The facts report 31 award records totaling $233,765,481.32, not provider identities. Unique recipients are unpublished. 31 is a record count, not a facility census. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 93.596 × NE pair.

Do campaign donations fund Nebraska CCDF matching awards?

No. FEC contribution files and USAspending award files are different datasets. This page reports $233,765,481.32 in 93.596 obligations tagged to Nebraska. Correlation is not causation. Do not treat donations as the funding source.