CCDF Mandatory and Matching Funds in Texas

Texas and CCDF mandatory funds as a pair

CFDA 93.596 is titled CHILD CARE MANDATORY AND MATCHING FUNDS OF THE CHILD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND. Crossed with Texas place of performance, obligations sum to $2,372,954,069.29 on 27 awards. The national 93.596 hub includes other states. Texas’s spending hub includes other programs. Only this intersection is reported here. $2,372,954,069.29 is an obligation aggregate from USAspending.gov, not an outlay and not a count of child-care slots in Texas.

Twenty-seven awards is a thin block-grant file with a few large instruments. The join does not name recipients. Packet facts are $2,372,954,069.29, 27 awards, TX, and 93.596. Correlation is not causation. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Keep CCDF Mandatory and Matching Funds and Texas together when reading $2,372,954,069.29.

Readers should keep CFDA 93.596 and Texas in the same sentence as $2,372,954,069.29. The live table is Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund in Texas. Parent hubs CFDA 93.596, Texas federal spending, and Texas programs are larger than this cell. All spending ties lists other spending ties. Do not add those parents into $2,372,954,069.29.

93.596 is not the discretionary CCDBG line

Child Care And Development Block Grant (CFDA 93.575) is a different CCDF catalog line. Mixing mandatory/matching funds (93.596) with the discretionary block grant would invent a combined child-care book this Texas cell does not contain. Mixing those series into $2,372,954,069.29 would invent a broader total than this cell contains. Facts available: Texas, CFDA 93.596, $2,372,954,069.29, 27 awards. Provider names, slot counts, and matching-rate tables are unpublished.

The catalog title names Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund, not a ranking of Texas child-care providers. Dividing $2,372,954,069.29 by 27 yields about $87.89 million per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. 27 is not a slot, provider, or family census.

Texas geography on the mandatory-matching tag

TX is the place-of-performance code. Awards billed to Austin, Houston, or Dallas can share the tag. Awards coded to Oklahoma, New Mexico, Arkansas, and Louisiana stay outside $2,372,954,069.29 even when activity later crosses those lines. The code does not convert $2.37 billion into a county child-care atlas.

Texas federal spending is the all-program parent. 93.596 is one row on Texas programs. $2.37 billion is not the state’s complete federal footprint. Open Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund in Texas for the filtered table, CFDA 93.596 for the catalog without a Texas filter, and All spending ties for other pairs. Do not add those parents into $2,372,954,069.29.

Twenty-seven awards and a high-eight-figure mean

$2,372,954,069.29 ÷ 27 is about $87.89 million per award. That average is a high-eight-figure mean on a thin file, not a median. Net obligations can include downward modifications; the total shown is the aggregate in the facts. Treat 27 as a record count, not as 27 unique providers or 27 named agencies.

Without a transaction register, you cannot see how many of the 27 rows are continuations, renewals, or corrections. Later ingests can restate $2,372,954,069.29 without changing the join key of 93.596 and TX. USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $2,372,954,069.29 is the net total supplied in the facts. The pair remains CCDF Mandatory and Matching Funds plus Texas. Do not treat $2,372,954,069.29 as an outlay series.

What the Texas CCDF join does not prove

A large 93.596 total tagged to Texas does not measure whether child-care prices fell in Texas, and it does not equal subsidies already paid to providers. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Correlation is not causation. The headline remains $2,372,954,069.29 on 27 awards for CCDF Mandatory and Matching Funds in Texas.

Keep both sides of the join: Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund and Texas, obligations only. Do not annualize $2,372,954,069.29 without a year field—this packet publishes none. Do not treat 27 as a slot, provider, or family census. Quote USAspending.gov and the overlay path rather than a wait-list narrative. Cite CCDF Mandatory and Matching Funds together with Texas whenever you reuse $2,372,954,069.29.

Citing CCDF mandatory funds in Texas

The overlay target is the Texas × CFDA 93.596 table. Open Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund in Texas when you want the same $2,372,954,069.29 / 27-award cell in the site’s data chrome. CFDA 93.596 drops the Texas filter. Texas federal spending drops the CFDA filter. Texas programs lists other catalogs beside 93.596. All spending ties indexes other pairs.

This page exists because two tables meet: a CFDA program and a place-of-performance state. It does not exist to argue that Texas won or lost federal money, that donations paid for the awards, or that obligations equal cash. The pair is 93.596 plus TX. Obligations of $2,372,954,069.29 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 93.596 × TX pair. 27 remains an award-record count, not a person, facility, or project census. Health Center Program (93.224) in Texas is a separate HHS overlay in this harvest at $2,417,209,551.24 across 202 awards. Do not add that clinic file into $2,372,954,069.29. Twenty-seven CCDF instruments imply about $87.9 million per award as a ratio, consistent with large state pass-throughs rather than one row per provider. Recipients remain unpublished.

Questions

How much CCDF mandatory and matching funding is obligated in Texas?

USAspending records $2,372,954,069.29 in CFDA 93.596 obligations with Texas place of performance on 27 awards. That is the pair total, not an outlay. Keep Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund and Texas together when citing $2,372,954,069.29.

Do 27 awards mean 27 Texas child-care agencies?

27 is a USAspending award-record count, not a slot, provider, or family census. The implied mean is about $87.89 million per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. 27 is a record count, not a person or facility census. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Is this the same as Texas's Child Care and Development Block Grant total?

No. This join is CFDA 93.596 only. The discretionary Child Care And Development Block Grant uses CFDA 93.575, a different catalog. Nationwide 93.596 is not limited to Texas. Obligations of $2,372,954,069.29 are not outlays. The overlay is the live CCDF Mandatory and Matching Funds–Texas table.

Have these child-care dollars already been paid to providers?

No. $2,372,954,069.29 is an obligation sum. Outlays are a different USAspending series. Drawdowns can lag the federal obligation. This packet has no outlay total. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 93.596 × TX pair. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.