CCDF mandatory and matching funds in Utah

What the 93.596–Utah join is

CFDA 93.596 is titled CHILD CARE MANDATORY AND MATCHING FUNDS OF THE CHILD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND. Filtered to Utah place of performance, obligations sum to $268,800,088.22 on 39 awards. The national CCDF matching hub has no Utah filter. The Utah spending hub has no CFDA filter. This tie is the intersection. $268,800,088.22 is an obligation aggregate from USAspending.gov, not an outlay and not a count of subsidized children in Salt Lake City or Provo.

The Child Care and Development Block Grant (discretionary CCDF) uses a different CFDA number. Mixing that catalog into $268,800,088.22 would invent a broader child-care total than this cell contains. Packet facts are $268,800,088.22, 39 awards, UT, and 93.596. Correlation is not causation.

Thirty-nine awards are not thirty-nine providers

The facts report 39 award records, not the identity of child-care providers. A state lead agency can post multiple instruments across modifications. Unique recipients are unpublished. 39 is not a census of licensed facilities in Utah.

A simple mean near $6.89 million per award is arithmetic only. The packet publishes no median, no maximum, and no year field. Do not annualize $268,800,088.22. Downward modifications, if present in the raw file, are already netted into the supplied total.

Utah geography on the 93.596 tag

UT is the place-of-performance code. A statewide matching award can still appear as records tagged to Salt Lake City or another in-state address. Awards coded to Idaho, Wyoming, Colorado, Arizona, or Nevada stay outside $268,800,088.22 even when a commuting family crosses those lines.

Utah federal spending is the all-program parent. 93.596 is one row on Utah programs. $268.8 million is not the state’s complete federal footprint. Open Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund in Utah for the filtered table, CFDA 93.596 for 93.596 without a Utah filter, and All spending ties for other pairs. Do not add those parents into $268,800,088.22.

What the CCDF matching–Utah pair does not prove

A large 93.596 total tagged to Utah does not measure wait lists, copayments, or provider wages. It does not equal subsidies paid to families. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. The headline remains $268,800,088.22 on 39 awards for CCDF mandatory and matching funds in Utah.

Keep both sides of the join: Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund and Utah, obligations only. Quote USAspending.gov and the overlay path rather than a child-care-supply story. Provider names are not in the facts and are not invented here.

Using the Utah CCDF matching overlay

The overlay target is the Utah × CFDA 93.596 table. Open Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund in Utah when you want the same $268,800,088.22 / 39-award cell in the site’s data chrome. CFDA 93.596 drops the Utah filter. Utah federal spending drops the CFDA filter. Utah programs lists other catalogs beside CCDF matching. All spending ties indexes other pairs.

This page exists because two tables meet: a CFDA program and a place-of-performance state. It does not exist to rank Utah, to argue that donations paid for the awards, or to treat obligations as cash. The pair is 93.596 plus UT. Obligations of $268,800,088.22 are not outlays. Cite CCDF mandatory and matching funds together with Utah whenever you reuse $268,800,088.22. 39 remains an award-record count on USAspending.gov. The overlay path is the live table for this 93.596 × UT cell. Later bulk files can restate $268,800,088.22 without changing the join key. AwardCount stays 39 until a new ingest revises it. Place of performance remains Utah; CFDA remains 93.596. Do not fold discretionary CCDF into $268,800,088.22. Do not treat 39 as a provider roster. Cite USAspending.gov. Obligations of $268,800,088.22 are not outlays. The pair is CCDF mandatory and matching funds plus Utah.

Limits of the packet facts for Utah 93.596

The packet publishes four numbers and two labels: $268,800,088.22, 39 awards, Utah, and CFDA 93.596 titled Child Care Mandatory And Matching Funds Of The Child Care And Development Fund. It does not publish fiscal year, unique recipients, slot counts, or outlays. Copayments and wait lists are not in the facts and are not estimated here.

Researchers who need award-level rows should open the overlay table and USAspending.gov rather than stretch $268,800,088.22 into a child-care-supply study. The join is a filter, not a causal claim. FEC files do not explain the 39 awards. Keep CCDF mandatory and matching funds named with Utah in every reuse of $268,800,088.22.

Questions

How much CCDF mandatory and matching funding is obligated in Utah?

USAspending records $268,800,088.22 in CFDA 93.596 obligations with Utah place of performance across 39 awards. That is the pair total, not an outlay and not a slot count. Keep CCDF mandatory and matching funds and Utah together when citing $268,800,088.22.

Is this Utah’s entire Child Care and Development Fund total?

No. This join is CFDA 93.596 only. Discretionary CCDF and other HHS catalogs appear on separate Utah program pages. Nationwide 93.596 is not limited to Utah. Obligations of $268,800,088.22 are not outlays.

Does 39 awards mean 39 Utah child-care centers?

The facts report 39 award records totaling $268,800,088.22, not provider identities. Unique recipients are unpublished. 39 is a record count, not a facility census. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 93.596 × UT pair.

Do FEC donations fund Utah CCDF matching awards?

No. Campaign-finance files and USAspending award files are separate. This page reports $268,800,088.22 in 93.596 obligations tagged to Utah. Correlation is not causation. Do not treat donations as the source of these obligations.