Skip to main content
← All data ties

Clean energy demonstrations in Ohio 8th District (OH-08)

Place-of-performance OH-08 crossed with Clean Energy Demonstrations (CFDA 81.255) yields $500,000,000 in USAspending.gov obligations on 1 awards. A single Clean Energy Demonstrations award equals about 12.8% of OH-08’s $3.90 billion district book — a one-row DOE cell whose share is high because the district denominator is relatively small. That pair is Clean Energy Demonstrations and Ohio 8th District (OH-08) — not Ohio’s entire federal inflow, not Clean Energy Demonstrations nationwide, and not cash already paid. The cell is 12.8% of this district’s published obligation total ($3,903,425,083.62). Implied average obligation is about $500,000,000 ($500,000,000 ÷ 1). Correlation is not causation.

Key figures

  • Clean energy demo in Ohio 8th District (OH-08): $500,000,000 across 1 USAspending awards.
  • Implied mean about $500,000,000 per record; district share 12.8% of $3,903,425,083.62.
  • CFDA 81.255 × OH-08 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a named-recipient list.
  • Cite USAspending.gov; quote Ohio 8th District and CFDA 81.255 if live tables moved.
  • Ohio federal spending and All spending ties are parents and an index, not amounts to add into $500,000,000.

The Ohio 8th District (OH-08) filter on Clean energy demo

CFDA 81.255 and congressional district OH-08 meet here. $500,000,000 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Clean Energy Demonstrations’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to Ohio 8th District (OH-08), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split generation from storage demonstrations and does not name sites. 1 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a plant census, a megawatt inventory, or a named-developer file.

Dividing $500,000,000 by 1 yields about $500,000,000 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical project cost or a posted per-megawatt figure. One award means the implied mean equals the $500.00 million cell. Unique recipients remain unpublished. Do not treat OH-08’s 81.255 cell as a synonym for every Clean energy demo account nationwide. Open Ohio 8th District for the district table without this program filter, CFDA 81.255 for CFDA 81.255 without the OH-08 filter, Ohio federal spending for every program in the Ohio extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $500,000,000.

The Clean energy demo catalog line

USAspending labels CFDA 81.255 as Clean Energy Demonstrations. That catalog number produced $500,000,000 when crossed with Ohio 8th District (OH-08) place of performance. The program-wide 81.255 hub does not require OH-08 geography. The district hub does not require Clean energy demo. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 1 awards. The packet does not split generation from storage demonstrations and does not name sites.

Correlation is not causation: Ohio 8th District (OH-08) did not “cause” $500,000,000 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 81.255 × OH-08 only. It is not a plant census, a megawatt inventory, or a named-developer file. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

Reading the OH-08 stamp

Ohio 8th District (OH-08) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list OH-08 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other Ohio districts belong on those ties even when the CFDA is also 81.255. Ohio 8th District (OH-08) is a numbered congressional place-of-performance code inside Ohio. Other Ohio districts are separate joins even when they reuse CFDA 81.255. Ohio 8th District (OH-08) is not Ohio 1st. The Crop Insurance pair on OH-01 uses CFDA 10.450, a USDA line, not 81.255.

Ohio federal spending shows how CFDA 81.255 sits beside other programs in the same state extract. $500,000,000 is one district-program column, not the state table. This packet does not split Ohio 8th District (OH-08) by county, city, or census tract. Awards that carry a different CFDA stay on those other ties even if the work sounds related to Clean Energy Demonstrations. The district-wide obligation total published here is $3,903,425,083.62; $500,000,000 is the Clean energy demo slice of that denominator.

USAspending obligations on this pair

USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $500,000,000 is that kind of sum for Clean Energy Demonstrations inside OH-08 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same CFDA rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $500,000,000 as given.

Ohio’s own budget is a separate ledger. Mixing it with the 1-row Clean energy demo cell leaves USAspending.gov. Treat 1 as award records in the aggregate, not unique vendors. 1 is not a count of plants, megawatts, or developers. Do not annualize without a year field in the packet. Do not per-capita or per-recipient the dollar total; those denominators are unpublished. The implied mean ($500,000,000) is a concentration statistic, not a typical project cost or a posted per-megawatt figure.

Citing $500,000,000 without dropping a join side

Cite USAspending.gov: Clean Energy Demonstrations (CFDA 81.255) obligated $500,000,000 on 1 awards coded to Ohio 8th District (OH-08). Name Clean Energy Demonstrations and Ohio 8th District (OH-08) together. Keep the obligation word. If Ohio 8th District or CFDA 81.255 has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a plant census, a megawatt inventory, or a named-developer file. 12.8% of $3,903,425,083.62 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score. Indiana 9th also hosts CFDA 81.255 on a different geography. Do not add those DOE cells. A 12.8% share is arithmetic, not a ranking.

Row count versus dollar concentration

One award means the implied mean equals the $500.00 million cell. Unique recipients remain unpublished. A large row count makes a project split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $500,000,000) and the district share (12.8% of $3,903,425,083.62) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer Ohio 8th District and CFDA 81.255 if the live tables moved.

Questions

How much Clean energy demo spending is coded to Ohio 8th District (OH-08)?
USAspending.gov lists $500,000,000 in Clean Energy Demonstrations obligations across 1 awards with place of performance in Ohio 8th District (OH-08). CFDA 81.255 × OH-08 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Ohio’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 12.8% of the district’s published total ($3,903,425,083.62). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $500,000,000, a ratio of those two facts only.
Does $500,000,000 include every Clean energy demo project in OH-08?
The packet publishes one CFDA rollup. The packet does not split generation from storage demonstrations and does not name sites. $500,000,000 is the combined obligation sum for CFDA 81.255 inside OH-08 coding. This page will not invent a project pie or name contractors. Open CFDA 81.255 and Ohio 8th District to inspect parent tables. 1 remains an action count, not a count of plants, megawatts, or developers.
Is $500,000,000 cash already paid in Ohio 8th District (OH-08)?
No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $500,000,000 as checks already cleared in Ohio 8th District (OH-08) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 1 awards. Prefer the live district and program hubs if the tables moved.
Why is the implied average $500,000,000 not a typical award?
The average is $500,000,000 divided by 1 awards, about $500,000,000. Thick files pull the mean down; thin files pull it up. Neither case publishes a typical instrument. Modifications add rows. Recipients are unpublished. Use the ratio only as a concentration statistic.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to CFDA program. Obligations are not outlays.