Comprehensive Literacy Development awarded by Department of Education
USAspending.gov records $1,053,489,397.58 in Comprehensive Literacy Development obligations awarded by the Department of Education. CFDA 84.371 via toptier agency 091 is the pair. The pair is 94.3% of the program extract of $1,117,072,033.57; any remainder may sit with other awarding agencies. The join lists 50 award records. That figure is not a student census and not cash already paid.
Key figures
- USAspending records $1,053,489,397.58 in Comprehensive Literacy Development via Education (CFDA 84.371, agency 091).
- The program extract publishes $1,117,072,033.57; the pair's published sum is $1,053,489,397.58.
- 50 is the join award-record count, not a classroom census.
- Obligations are not outlays; FEC donations do not fund this total.
What the 84.371–Education join is
CFDA 84.371 and the Department of Education (agency 091) meet in one program-agency cell. $1,053,489,397.58 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum tagged to that pair. It is not an outlay register, not a reading-score table, and not a count of classrooms. Comprehensive Literacy Development is the Catalog title; this packet does not split $1,053,489,397.58 among grade bands or name states as award recipients.
A one-billion-dollar literacy cell that is not identical to the program extract invites a remainder story. The pair is 94.3% of the program extract of $1,117,072,033.57; any remainder may sit with other awarding agencies. Unique recipients are unpublished. Correlation with NAEP headlines is not causation. The join is a CFDA code plus an awarding agency.
The program book beside agency 091
The pair is 94.3% of the program extract of $1,117,072,033.57; any remainder may sit with other awarding agencies. Open /programs/84.371/ for CFDA 84.371 without requiring this agency filter, and /agencies/091/ for the Department of Education hub without requiring this CFDA filter. Those parents are not addends to $1,053,489,397.58.
Do not fold CFDA 84.215 literacy-and-community-schools dollars into this Comprehensive Literacy Development cell. Those are other programs. Cite $1,053,489,397.58 as Comprehensive Literacy Development via Education. /programs/ lists every program; /ties/ indexes other pairs.
50 award records are not a classroom census
50 is the award-record count on this CFDA 84.371 × agency 091 join. A concentrated file of 50 rows is not a classroom census and not unique states. Dividing $1,053,489,397.58 by 50 would invent a typical grant the packet does not publish. Unique recipients remain unpublished.
What the 84.371 Education table omits
No outlay total, no grade-band pie, no named states, no student roster. FEC donation tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Quote CFDA 84.371, agency 091, and $1,053,489,397.58 together. Obligations remain commitments, not checks cleared.
Citing Comprehensive Literacy Development via Education
Keep Comprehensive Literacy Development and the Department of Education on the same citation as $1,053,489,397.58. Use /programs/84.371/ for the program hub, /agencies/091/ for the agency hub, /programs/ for every program, and /ties/ for other joins.
The 50 award-record figure stays on this pair. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Obligations of $1,053,489,397.58 are not outlays. Keep Comprehensive Literacy Development and Department of Education together when citing $1,053,489,397.58. CFDA 84.371 via agency 091 lists 50 award records on this join. Obligations of $1,053,489,397.58 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this CFDA 84.371 × agency 091 pair. Do not add parent hubs into this program-agency cell. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Unique recipients remain unpublished on this Comprehensive Literacy Development join. Quote CFDA 84.371, agency 091, and $1,053,489,397.58 in one sentence. The All programs index and All spending ties index are larger than this cell. A later USAspending ingest can restate $1,053,489,397.58 without changing the join keys. The pair is 94.3% of the program extract of $1,117,072,033.57; any remainder may sit with other awarding agencies. Place-of-performance and NAICS splits are omitted from this packet. Keep Comprehensive Literacy Development and Department of Education together when citing $1,053,489,397.58. CFDA 84.371 via agency 091 lists 50 award records on this join. Obligations of $1,053,489,397.58 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this CFDA 84.371 × agency 091 pair. Do not add parent hubs into this program-agency cell. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Unique recipients remain unpublished on this Comprehensive Literacy Development join. Quote CFDA 84.371, agency 091, and $1,053,489,397.58 in one sentence.
Questions
- How much is Comprehensive Literacy Development via Education?
- USAspending.gov records $1,053,489,397.58 in Comprehensive Literacy Development obligations awarded by Education (CFDA 84.371, agency 091). That amount is an obligation join, not an outlay. Keep Comprehensive Literacy Development and Department of Education on the same citation as $1,053,489,397.58.
- Is $1,053,489,397.58 the entire CFDA 84.371 program total?
- The program extract publishes $1,117,072,033.57. The pair is 94.3% of the program extract of $1,117,072,033.57. Do not add the program hub or the Education hub into this cell as if they were extra dollars.
- Do 50 awards mean 50 literacy programs?
- No. 50 is the award-record count on this program-agency join, not a classroom census. The packet does not name states or contractors. Obligations of $1,053,489,397.58 are not outlays. Obligations of $1,053,489,397 Keep both join sides in the citation.
- Do campaign donations fund these comprehensive-literacy obligations?
- No. FEC contribution tables and USAspending obligations are different datasets. Sharing a calendar year does not mean donations funded $1,053,489,397.58. This page reports USAspending.gov only. USAspending.gov remains the source for CFDA 84.371 via agency 091.
USAspending.gov CFDA program joined to awarding agency. Obligations are not outlays.