Computer facilities management in Alaska (NAICS 541513)

Reading the facilities-management–Alaska cell

NAICS 541513 and place-of-performance state AK meet here. $90,031,107.88 is the obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not the nationwide facilities-management total, not Alaska’s full spending rollup, and not cash already paid. USAspending labels the industry Computer Facilities Management Services; this overlay applies that code only where Alaska is the geography field.

120 is an award-action count. Modifications, delivery orders, and repeat vehicles add rows. Unique vendors are not published in this packet. Dividing $90,031,107.88 by 120 yields about $750,259 per award on average. The join does not rank Alaska against other states and does not assign a fiscal year; none is in the facts.

Open Alaska federal spending for the state rollup, NAICS 541513 for the industry hub, Alaska industries for other NAICS in the same geography, and All spending ties for other pairs.

The overlay exists because two filters are true at once. Quote the industry code and the state together whenever you reuse the headline dollar figure. The packet publishes an obligation sum and an award-action count; it does not publish unique vendors, a median, outlays, or a fiscal year. Parent hubs remain the place to see the statewide mix and the national industry page without the other filter.

NAICS 541513 as the operations side

USAspending labels NAICS 541513 as Computer Facilities Management Services. The packet does not name sites, networks, or primes. Sharing a state with systems-design or data-processing codes does not merge those pages into this cell. The industry hub for NAICS 541513 does not require Alaska geography; only this overlay applies both filters.

A second 541513 join in another state uses the same NAICS and a different dollar total. Do not treat Alaska’s figure as a synonym for every computer-facilities-management award in the catalog. Award titles on the NAICS 541513 page are the place to see what a given line bought. Keep the six-digit label when you cite the Alaska cell.

Place of performance in Alaska

Alaska on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to Alaska residents. Alaska POP is statewide, not an Anchorage-only overlay. Place of performance can list AK while later work occurs in Washington or elsewhere; those states are not inside this total unless also coded AK.

The state hub for Alaska shows how NAICS 541513 sits beside other industries in the same geography. This packet does not split metros, boroughs, or congressional districts. Contractor headquarters can differ from the place-of-performance tag.

Award count, mean, and obligations

120 awards against $90,031,107.88 produces a mean of about $750,259. That mean is still only a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical invoice. Award count 120 is a record count, not a payment count and not a unique-contractor census.

An obligation is a legal commitment. $90,031,107.88 is that kind of sum. Outlays can lag. This packet has no outlay total and no fiscal-year split. Citing $90,031,107.88 as cash already spent in Alaska over-reads the field.

What this pair does not prove

A mid-count IT-operations cell is not proof of a single prime and not proof that Alaska specialized in computer facilities management because of federal demand. Keep $90,031,107.88 labeled as NAICS 541513 obligations with Alaska place of performance. Campaign contributions and USAspending awards are different datasets; this page does not claim donations fund these obligations. Correlation is not causation.

How to cite computer facilities management in Alaska

Cite USAspending.gov, NAICS 541513 (Computer Facilities Management Services), Alaska (AK), $90,031,107.88, and 120 awards. Note that the figures are obligations. Point readers to Alaska federal spending, NAICS 541513, Alaska industries, and All spending ties rather than collapsing those pages into this cell. Mean per award stays about $750,259 as a ratio only.

Readers who reuse this snapshot should keep both sides of the join in the same sentence and treat award rows as records rather than unique vendors. This narrative does not invent a fiscal year, a recipient list, or an outlay total that the packet omitted. Place of performance remains a geography tag, not proof that work stayed inside Alaska. Keep the obligation word on $90,031,107.88 in every footnote.

Questions

How much has NAICS 541513 obligated in Alaska?

USAspending.gov records $90,031,107.88 in obligations for NAICS 541513 (Computer Facilities Management Services) with Alaska place of performance, covering 120 awards. That is an obligation total, not an outlay total, and not the nationwide facilities-management figure. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Does $90.0M mean the Treasury spent that much in Alaska?

No. The figure is obligations on awards tagged to NAICS 541513 and Alaska place of performance. Outlays can differ. Place of performance is a geography field, not proof that every dollar was disbursed to Alaska vendors or residents. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

How many computer-facilities-management awards sit in Alaska?

The extract lists 120 awards totaling $90,031,107.88 for computer facilities management (541513) with Alaska place of performance. About $750,259 per award is a ratio of those two facts, not a typical invoice. Unique vendors are not published in this packet. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Where is the live 541513–Alaska table?

Alaska federal spending is the state rollup. NAICS 541513 is the industry hub without a state filter. Alaska industries lists other NAICS in Alaska. All spending ties lists other pairs. The $90,031,107.88 and 120 awards on this page are the 541513×AK join only. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.