Computer Systems Design Services in Kansas 2nd District (KS-02)

Reading NAICS 541512 inside KS-02

Congressional district KS-02 and NAICS 541512 meet here. $4,662,248,934.39 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Computer Systems Design Services's nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to Kansas 2nd District (KS-02), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split custom programming versus integration, or contract versus assistance. 34 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. This cell is not a systems-integrator headcount, a software catalog, or a named-vendor file.

Dividing $4,662,248,934.39 by 34 yields about $137,124,968.66 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical contract, grant, or benefit line. 34 awards is a thin design file with a nine-figure implied mean. Integrator names are unpublished. Do not treat KS-02's 541512 cell as a synonym for every Systems Design account nationwide. Open /districts/KS-02/ (Kansas 2nd District) for the district table without this NAICS filter, /industries/541512/ (NAICS 541512) for NAICS 541512 without a KS-02 filter, /states/ks/ (Kansas federal spending) for every industry in the Kansas extract, and /ties/ (All spending ties) for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $4,662,248,934.39.

This page reports computer systems design services activity USAspending tagged to Kansas 2nd District (KS-02). The headline $4,662,248,934.39 sits beside a district-wide obligation total of $15,017,829,163.29; the 31.0% share is arithmetic on those two packet facts, not a ranking of Kansas districts as winners or losers. District 90 and 98 placeholders are omitted from this harvest. Obligations are not outlays. A high district share is not a ranking of Kansas districts. The denominator is this packet's district total only.

Industry 541512 without inventing a product pie

USAspending labels NAICS 541512 as Computer Systems Design Services. That code produced $4,662,248,934.39 when crossed with Kansas 2nd District (KS-02) place of performance. The industry-wide 541512 hub does not require KS-02 geography. The district hub does not require Systems Design. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 34 awards. The packet does not split custom programming versus integration, or contract versus assistance.

How Kansas 2nd District is coded

Kansas 2nd District (KS-02) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list KS-02 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other Kansas districts belong on those ties even when the industry is also NAICS 541512. Kansas 2nd District (KS-02) is a numbered stamp inside Kansas. Other Kansas districts are not this join.

/states/ks/ shows how NAICS 541512 sits beside other industries in the same state extract. $4,662,248,934.39 is one district-industry column, not the state table. This packet does not split Kansas 2nd District (KS-02) by county, city, or census tract. Awards that carry a different NAICS stay on those other ties even if the work sounds related to Computer Systems Design Services. The district-wide obligation total published here is $15,017,829,163.29; $4,662,248,934.39 is the Systems Design slice of that denominator.

What the dollar figure is allowed to mean

USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $4,662,248,934.39 is that kind of sum for Computer Systems Design Services inside KS-02 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same NAICS rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $4,662,248,934.39 as given.

Kansas's own budget is a separate ledger. Mixing it with the 34-row Systems Design cell leaves USAspending.gov. Treat 34 as award records in the aggregate, not unique vendors. Do not annualize without a year field in the packet. Do not per-capita or per-recipient the dollar total; those denominators are unpublished. The implied mean ($137,124,968.66) is a concentration statistic, not a typical KS-02 Systems Design payment.

Parents of this tie: district, industry, state

Cite USAspending.gov: Computer Systems Design Services (NAICS 541512) obligated $4,662,248,934.39 on 34 awards coded to Kansas 2nd District (KS-02). Name Computer Systems Design Services and Kansas 2nd District (KS-02) together. Keep the obligation word. If /districts/KS-02/ or /industries/541512/ has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a systems-integrator headcount, a software catalog, or a named-vendor file. 31.0% of $15,017,829,163.29 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score.

Keep Computer Systems Design Services, Kansas 2nd District (KS-02), $4,662,248,934.39, and 34 awards together. /ties/ indexes other pairs. /industries/541512/ is the 541512 parent without a KS-02 filter. /states/ks/ is the Kansas parent. Do not add those parents to this cell. Sharing a district with Systems Design does not mean campaign donations funded these awards, and it does not convert obligations into outlays. This page reports one USAspending join. Maryland 4th also hosts 541512 (307 rows). Matching the NAICS does not merge KS-02 and MD-04.

Limits of the KS-02 × 541512 snapshot

34 awards is a thin design file with a nine-figure implied mean. Integrator names are unpublished. Maryland 4th also hosts 541512 (307 rows). Matching the NAICS does not merge KS-02 and MD-04. A large row count makes a program split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $137,124,968.66) and the district share (31.0% of $15,017,829,163.29) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer /districts/KS-02/ and /industries/541512/ if the live tables moved. A high district share is not a ranking of Kansas districts. The denominator is this packet's district total only.

Do not rank Kansas 2nd District (KS-02) as more Systems Design-dependent than neighboring districts on the strength of this cell alone. Neighboring geographies have their own 541512 ties with different dollar totals, or no published 541512 cell in this harvest. This snapshot holds $4,662,248,934.39 and 34 only. /ties/ is the index, not an addend. Obligations are not outlays. Correlation is not causation. A reader who only quotes $4,662,248,934.39 without Kansas 2nd District (KS-02) and NAICS 541512 has dropped a join side.

Questions

How much Systems Design spending is coded to Kansas 2nd District (KS-02)?

USAspending.gov lists $4,662,248,934.39 in Computer Systems Design Services obligations across 34 awards with place of performance in Kansas 2nd District (KS-02). NAICS 541512 × KS-02 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Kansas's complete federal ledger. The cell is 31.0% of the district's published total ($15,017,829,163.29). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $137,124,968.66, a ratio of those two facts only.

Does $4,662,248,934.39 include every Systems Design program in KS-02?

The packet publishes one NAICS rollup. The packet does not split custom programming versus integration, or contract versus assistance. $4,662,248,934.39 is the combined obligation sum for NAICS 541512 inside KS-02 coding. This page will not invent a program pie or name contractors. Open /industries/541512/ and /districts/KS-02/ to inspect parent tables. 34 remains an action count, not a program count.

Is $4,662,248,934.39 cash already paid in Kansas 2nd District (KS-02)?

No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet's headline. Treating $4,662,248,934.39 as checks already cleared in Kansas 2nd District (KS-02) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 34 awards. Prefer the live district and industry hubs if the tables moved.

Do FEC donations fund these Systems Design awards in KS-02?

No. FEC receipts and USAspending obligations are different datasets. Sharing Kansas geography does not mean donations funded $4,662,248,934.39 in Kansas 2nd District (KS-02). This page reports USAspending.gov NAICS 541512 crossed with place of performance KS-02. It does not report campaign finance. Keep Computer Systems Design Services and Kansas 2nd District (KS-02) on the same citation.