Computer systems design services in North Carolina (NAICS 541512)

NAICS 541512 and North Carolina as a systems-design join

This page intersects one six-digit industry and one state. $95,427,363.9 is the obligation sum where both filters are true. NAICS 541512 is computer systems design services, not a statewide spending total and not a national 541512 rollup. Those parent tables live on North Carolina federal spending and NAICS 541512.

163 awards against $95.4 million is a mid-count services cell rather than a catalog of tiny delivery orders. 163 is an award-record count. Modifications can sit beside base awards. The packet does not say how many unique vendors produced the 163 lines. Reading 163 as shops, campuses, or clinics in North Carolina would confuse actions with establishments.

North Carolina industries lists other NAICS codes with NC place of performance. All spending ties indexes other state–industry pairs. Do not sum those indexes into $95,427,363.9. The headline remains $95,427,363.9 on 163 awards for this pair alone.

The overlay exists because two filters are true at once. Quote the industry code and the state together whenever you reuse the headline dollar figure. The packet publishes an obligation sum and an award-action count; it does not publish unique vendors, a median, outlays, or a fiscal year. Parent hubs remain the place to see the statewide mix and the national industry page without the other filter.

Computer systems design, not hardware manufacturing

USAspending labels NAICS 541512 as Computer Systems Design Services. The packet does not name platforms, agencies, or primes. Hardware manufacturing and facilities-management codes never enter $95,427,363.9 unless they also appear as 541512, which they do not. Keep the six-digit label when you cite the North Carolina cell.

Research Triangle folklore is ordinary speech, not extra packet dollars. Unique contractors are unpublished. Dividing $95,427,363.9 by 163 produces about $585,444. That quotient is arithmetic, not a typical North Carolina contract. There is no median, no top-award table, and no fiscal-year breakout on this packet. Do not treat the mean as a posted unit price.

North Carolina geography on a 541512 cell

North Carolina place of performance can cover the Research Triangle, Charlotte, or a reporting address near a federal installation. The packet has no site split. Inside the NC tag, named cities are not broken out. A named city can sit inside $95,427,363.9 only if its awards carry NAICS 541512 and NC — which this narrative cannot verify.

Place-of-performance geography is not the same as contractor headquarters. A firm based elsewhere can perform in North Carolina, and a North Carolina address can appear on work done out of state. This join reports the coded pair, not a campus map. North Carolina federal spending remains the statewide parent.

Obligations versus outlays for North Carolina 541512

USAspending obligations are commitments, not checks that have cleared. $95,427,363.9 can include amounts that will be paid later, cancelled, or modified. The packet does not publish outlays. 163 is not a payment count. Quote NAICS 541512 in North Carolina as obligations and leave fiscal-year folklore off the citation — years are unpublished here.

What the systems-design–North Carolina pair does not prove

The pair does not prove that North Carolina specialized in systems design because of federal demand, or the reverse. Unique contractors are unpublished. Campaign-finance tables are a different dataset; donations do not fund these awards. Keep both sides of the join in any headline: NAICS 541512 and North Carolina. Place of performance remains a geography tag, not proof that work stayed inside the named state.

How to cite computer systems design in North Carolina

Cite USAspending.gov, NAICS 541512 (Computer Systems Design Services), North Carolina (NC), $95,427,363.9, and 163 awards. Note that the figures are obligations. Point readers to North Carolina federal spending, NAICS 541512, North Carolina industries, and All spending ties rather than collapsing those pages into this cell. Mean per award stays about $585,444 as a ratio only.

Readers who reuse this snapshot should keep both sides of the join in the same sentence and treat award rows as records rather than unique vendors. This narrative does not invent a fiscal year, a recipient list, or an outlay total that the packet omitted. Place of performance remains a geography tag, not proof that work stayed inside North Carolina. Keep the obligation word on $95,427,363.9 in every footnote.

Questions

How much has NAICS 541512 obligated in North Carolina?

The pair totals $95,427,363.9 across 163 awards, per USAspending.gov NAICS industry aggregates by place of performance state. Those are obligations for Computer Systems Design Services inside North Carolina coding, not outlays and not every federal dollar in North Carolina. Source filings stay on USAspending.gov.

How many systems-design awards sit in North Carolina?

163 award records produced $95,427,363.9. Concentration or dispersion is visible only as that count against that sum. About $585,444 per award is $95,427,363.9 divided by 163, not a typical North Carolina purchase. The packet does not list unique recipients or a median award.

Is this North Carolina software contracting?

The packet labels NAICS 541512 as computer systems design services. $95,427,363.9 is that code with North Carolina place of performance. Software folklore is not a packet field. Quote systems design and North Carolina together. Those figures are obligations, not outlays.

Where are the parent North Carolina and NAICS 541512 tables?

Use North Carolina federal spending for the statewide industry mix, NAICS 541512 for the national industry page, North Carolina industries for the state NAICS index, and All spending ties for other joins. This page quotes only the 541512 × NC cell. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.