Military Installation Natural Resources funding in Hawaii

32 installation natural-resource awards tagged to Hawaii

The headline number is $78,621,093.25. It sits on Conservation And Rehabilitation Of Natural Resources On Military Installations crossed with Hawaii place of performance. Award count is 32. USAspending.gov is the source. The page is a JOIN, not an installation, acre, or species census and not an outlay conversion.

Mean obligation is about $2,456,909.16 if $78,621,093.25 were split evenly across 32 lines — a mechanical ratio, not a typical installation agreement and not a typical habitat acre. Cooperative agreements and installation natural-resource awards often explain why a modest row count can still carry a nine-figure book. Recipients are omitted because they are not in the facts.

Honolulu did not create the cell by appearing as HI. Matching 12.005 to Hawaii is not a finding about endangered-species counts. Neighboring geographies (California, Guam, or other Pacific codes) have their own joins. The overlay is Conservation And Rehabilitation Of Natural Resources On Military Installations in Hawaii.

CFDA 12.005 without an acre or species roster

Catalog language on the line is CONSERVATION AND REHABILITATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES ON MILITARY INSTALLATIONS. That title does not convert $78,621,093.25 into a grade of Hawaii's conservation and rehabilitation of natural resources on military installations performance. CFDA 12.005 without a Hawaii filter is a different page.

DoD natural-resources program reports and installation INRMP summaries live elsewhere. Installation-INRMP folklore is not stored on this packet. Sikes Act or USDA conservation listings would have to carry 12.005 to sit inside $78,621,093.25; they generally do not.

Hawaii federal spending besides military natural resources

Hawaii federal spending and Hawaii programs place 12.005 among other listings. Mixing those shelves would invent a share of conservation and rehabilitation of natural resources on military installations spending the packet never computed. 32 awards remain assistance rows, not a census.

Honolulu did not receive $78,621,093.25 as a named city appropriation. Pearl Harbor folklore is not a metro cut. Place of performance as HI locates tagged awards.

Cooperative-agreement obligations are not habitat already restored

Keep the obligation word on $78,621,093.25 in every footnote. Outlays are unpublished here. Remaining balances, modifications as separate lines, and draw timing are not in the facts. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Pearl Harbor-versus-Schofield stories are not an installation split. This packet names no bases. Do not treat a state-level appropriations chart as this cell unless it uses CFDA 12.005, Hawaii geography, and the obligation metric.

How to cite the 12.005–Hawaii join

Start with Conservation And Rehabilitation Of Natural Resources On Military Installations in Hawaii for the 32-award table behind $78,621,093.25. Then step to CFDA 12.005 (nationwide), Hawaii federal spending, Hawaii programs, and All spending ties. Do not add those parents into the pair total.

Reuse the snapshot only with both keys: Conservation And Rehabilitation Of Natural Resources On Military Installations and Hawaii. Later bulk files override dollars and counts. This narrative does not invent a fiscal year.

What 32 Hawaii installation-resource rows will not prove

Correlation between a catalog code and a geography tag is the join — nothing more. FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. 32 awards totaling $78,621,093.25 will not be asked to prove an installation, acre, or species census.

Pearl Harbor-versus-Schofield stories are not an installation split. This packet names no bases. Keep Conservation And Rehabilitation Of Natural Resources On Military Installations, Hawaii, $78,621,093.25, and 32 awards together in every reuse. Place of performance as HI locates the tagged awards; it does not prove every dollar stayed inside Hawaii after obligation. Honolulu folklore is not a split of the 32 rows, and Pearl Harbor is not a named recipient of $78,621,093.25.

USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $78,621,093.25 is the net total supplied in the facts. Treat 32 as a record count in an aggregate, not as 32 finished program years. Award modifications can sit beside base records in the same row count. The mean of about $2,456,909.16 per record will mislead anyone who treats it as a typical installation agreement and not a typical habitat acre.

Questions

How much military-installation natural-resources funding is obligated in Hawaii?

USAspending.gov records $78,621,093.25 in CFDA 12.005 obligations across 32 awards coded to Hawaii. That is a program × state join, not an outlay and not Hawaii's full federal total. Keep both the program name and Hawaii in any citation.

Do 32 awards mean 32 Hawaii military bases?

Award count is a row count. $78,621,093.25 ÷ 32 is about $2,456,909.16 per record as a mean, not a typical installation agreement and not a typical habitat acre. Cooperative agreements and installation natural-resource awards can dominate dollars. This packet does not list recipients. See Conservation And Rehabilitation Of Natural Resources On Military Installations in Hawaii for the stored table.

Is this Hawaii's entire federal conservation book?

No. The $78,621,093.25 and 32 awards are USAspending.gov obligation records for CFDA 12.005 with a Hawaii geography tag. Sikes Act, USDA conservation, and other DoD environmental listings use different CFDAs. Those dollars sit outside this join. Mixing those files with this join would invent a figure the packet does not support.

Where is the live Hawaii × 12.005 overlay?

Conservation And Rehabilitation Of Natural Resources On Military Installations in Hawaii is the overlay. See Hawaii federal spending, Hawaii programs, CFDA 12.005, and All spending ties. Later bulk files override this snapshot. Keep the obligation label on $78,621,093.25. Do not invent a fiscal year.