Conservation Reserve Program federal funding in North Dakota

29,149 CRP rows under a North Dakota geography tag

Two tables meet: CFDA 10.069 (Conservation Reserve Program) and North Dakota (ND) as place of performance. Their intersection is $76,508,604.91 on 29,149 USAspending.gov awards. The join is not a farm, acre, or contract census. Awards coded to Minnesota, South Dakota, or Montana stay outside this cell even if activity later crosses those lines.

Producer-level CRP awards and annual rental batches can hold most of $76,508,604.91 while the count remains 29,149. Dividing $76,508,604.91 by 29,149 gives a mean of about $2,624.74. That ratio is not a typical CRP contract and not a typical acre rental. Unique recipients are unpublished.

Bismarck did not create the cell by appearing as ND. Matching 10.069 to North Dakota is not a finding about idle acres. The overlay Conservation Reserve Program in North Dakota holds the stored rows. Do not add EQIP or CSP listings into $76,508,604.91.

Conservation Reserve as a producer file, not an acre census

CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM is the catalog wording USAspending stores on the assistance line. It is not a ranking of North Dakota against other states. The national CFDA 10.069 hub drops the North Dakota filter. This packet quotes no nationwide Conservation Reserve Program total.

Readers who want FSA CRP enrollment reports and NASS acreage publications should open those publications. Mixing them with 29,149 USAspending rows would invent a figure this packet does not support. CRP-acre folklore is not a field in the facts.

North Dakota federal spending besides CRP

Open North Dakota federal spending for every program coded to the state. Open North Dakota programs for the directory that includes 10.069 as one row. $76,508,604.91 is the tagged pair only. EQIP or CSP listings remain separate joins.

A Conservation Reserve Program award can carry a North Dakota geography tag because a pass-through agency sits there. That tag does not prove work stayed inside North Dakota after obligation. Fargo is not a named recipient of $76,508,604.91.

CRP obligations are not rental checks already cashed

$76,508,604.91 is an obligation rollup. Outlays — Treasury payments — are a different USAspending series and are not in this packet. Drawdowns can lag the commitment. Cite USAspending.gov, not a state-budget story.

Fargo-versus-Minot stories are not a county split. This packet has no contract map and no acre table. Bismarck folklore is not a split of the 29,149 rows. No fiscal year is attached to $76,508,604.91.

How to cite the 10.069–North Dakota join

A complete citation names Conservation Reserve Program, CFDA 10.069, North Dakota, $76,508,604.91, and 29,149 awards, and labels the dollars as obligations. All spending ties indexes other pairs on the same metric.

If a later ingest restates the cell, the overlay Conservation Reserve Program in North Dakota is the live source. This JSON is a packet snapshot. Parent hubs (CFDA 10.069, North Dakota federal spending, North Dakota programs) are not extra dollars to add.

What 29,149 North Dakota CRP rows will not prove

FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Matching 10.069 to ND is not causation. 29,149 is a record count, not a farm, acre, or contract census. Do not rank North Dakota as a winner or loser on Conservation Reserve Program.

Fargo-versus-Minot stories are not a county split. This packet has no contract map and no acre table. Keep Conservation Reserve Program, North Dakota, $76,508,604.91, and 29,149 awards together in every reuse. Place of performance as ND locates the tagged awards; it does not prove every dollar stayed inside North Dakota after obligation. Bismarck folklore is not a split of the 29,149 rows, and Fargo is not a named recipient of $76,508,604.91.

USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $76,508,604.91 is the net total supplied in the facts. Treat 29,149 as a record count in an aggregate, not as 29,149 finished program years. Award modifications can sit beside base records in the same row count. The mean of about $2,624.74 per record will mislead anyone who treats it as a typical CRP contract and not a typical acre rental.

Questions

How much Conservation Reserve Program funding is obligated in North Dakota?

USAspending.gov records $76,508,604.91 in CFDA 10.069 obligations across 29,149 awards coded to North Dakota. That is a program × state join, not an outlay and not North Dakota's full federal total. Keep both the program name and North Dakota in any citation.

Do 29,149 awards mean 29,149 North Dakota farms?

Award count is a row count. $76,508,604.91 ÷ 29,149 is about $2,624.74 per record as a mean, not a typical CRP contract and not a typical acre rental. Producer-level CRP awards and annual rental batches can dominate dollars. This packet does not list recipients. See Conservation Reserve Program in North Dakota for the stored table.

Is this North Dakota's entire federal farm-conservation book?

No. The $76,508,604.91 and 29,149 awards are USAspending.gov obligation records for CFDA 10.069 with a North Dakota geography tag. EQIP, CSP, and other NRCS or FSA listings use different CFDAs. Those dollars sit outside this join. Mixing those files with this join would invent a figure the packet does not support.

Where is the live North Dakota × 10.069 overlay?

Conservation Reserve Program in North Dakota is the overlay. See North Dakota federal spending, North Dakota programs, CFDA 10.069, and All spending ties. Later bulk files override this snapshot. Keep the obligation label on $76,508,604.91. Do not invent a fiscal year.