Conservation Stewardship Program in Idaho

Idaho × CFDA 10.924 as a stewardship cell

Two tables meet: CFDA 10.924 (Conservation Stewardship Program) and Idaho (ID) as place of performance. Their intersection is $55,564,717.07 on 448 USAspending.gov awards. The join is not a farm, contract, or acre census. Awards coded to Washington, Oregon, or Montana stay outside this cell even if activity later crosses those lines.

Producer-level CSP awards and annual payments can hold most of $55,564,717.07 while the count remains 448. Dividing $55,564,717.07 by 448 gives a mean of about $124,028.39. That ratio is not a typical CSP contract and not a typical acre payment. Unique recipients are unpublished.

Boise did not cause the total by appearing as ID. Matching 10.924 to Idaho is not a finding about treated acres. The overlay Conservation Stewardship Program in Idaho holds the stored rows. Do not add EQIP or CRP listings into $55,564,717.07.

Conservation Stewardship as catalog language, not an acre census

CONSERVATION STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM is the catalog wording USAspending stores on the assistance line. It is not a ranking of Idaho against other states. The national CFDA 10.924 hub drops the Idaho filter. This packet quotes no nationwide Conservation Stewardship Program total.

Readers who want NRCS CSP enrollment reports and state conservation-district summaries should open those publications. Mixing them with 448 USAspending rows would invent a figure this packet does not support. CSP-contract folklore is not a field in the facts.

Idaho's place-of-performance tag on 10.924

Open Idaho federal spending for every program coded to the state. Open Idaho programs for the directory that includes 10.924 as one row. $55,564,717.07 is the tagged pair only. EQIP or CRP listings remain separate joins.

A Conservation Stewardship Program award can carry a Idaho geography tag because a pass-through agency sits there. That tag does not prove work stayed inside Idaho after obligation. Twin Falls is not a named recipient of $55,564,717.07.

CSP obligations are not acre payments already posted

$55,564,717.07 is an obligation rollup. Outlays — Treasury payments — are a different USAspending series and are not in this packet. Drawdowns can lag the commitment. Cite USAspending.gov, not a state-budget story.

Twin Falls-versus-Idaho Falls stories are not a county split. This packet has no contract map. Boise folklore is not a split of the 448 rows. No fiscal year is attached to $55,564,717.07.

How to cite Conservation Stewardship in Idaho

A complete citation names Conservation Stewardship Program, CFDA 10.924, Idaho, $55,564,717.07, and 448 awards, and labels the dollars as obligations. All spending ties indexes other pairs on the same metric.

If a later ingest restates the cell, the overlay Conservation Stewardship Program in Idaho is the live source. This JSON is a packet snapshot. Parent hubs (CFDA 10.924, Idaho federal spending, Idaho programs) are not extra dollars to add.

What 448 Idaho CSP rows will not prove

FEC donations do not fund this USAspending cell. Matching 10.924 to ID is not causation. 448 is a record count, not a farm, contract, or acre census. Do not rank Idaho as a winner or loser on Conservation Stewardship Program.

Twin Falls-versus-Idaho Falls stories are not a county split. This packet has no contract map. Keep Conservation Stewardship Program, Idaho, $55,564,717.07, and 448 awards together in every reuse. Place of performance as ID locates the tagged awards; it does not prove every dollar stayed inside Idaho after obligation. Boise folklore is not a split of the 448 rows, and Twin Falls is not a named recipient of $55,564,717.07.

USAspending obligations can be positive new awards or net of downward modifications; $55,564,717.07 is the net total supplied in the facts. Treat 448 as a record count in an aggregate, not as 448 finished program years. Award modifications can sit beside base records in the same row count. The mean of about $124,028.39 per record will mislead anyone who treats it as a typical CSP contract and not a typical acre payment.

Questions

How much Conservation Stewardship Program funding is obligated in Idaho?

USAspending.gov records $55,564,717.07 in CFDA 10.924 obligations across 448 awards coded to Idaho. That is a program × state join, not an outlay and not Idaho's full federal total. Keep both the program name and Idaho in any citation.

Do 448 awards mean 448 Idaho farms?

Award count is a row count. $55,564,717.07 ÷ 448 is about $124,028.39 per record as a mean, not a typical CSP contract and not a typical acre payment. Producer-level CSP awards and annual payments can dominate dollars. This packet does not list recipients. See Conservation Stewardship Program in Idaho for the stored table.

Is this Idaho's entire federal conservation book?

No. The $55,564,717.07 and 448 awards are USAspending.gov obligation records for CFDA 10.924 with a Idaho geography tag. EQIP, CRP, and other NRCS or FSA listings use different CFDAs. Those dollars sit outside this join. Mixing those files with this join would invent a figure the packet does not support.

Where is the live Idaho × 10.924 overlay?

Conservation Stewardship Program in Idaho is the overlay. See Idaho federal spending, Idaho programs, CFDA 10.924, and All spending ties. Later bulk files override this snapshot. Keep the obligation label on $55,564,717.07. Do not invent a fiscal year.