Conservation Stewardship Program federal funding in North Dakota

1,163 awards on the North Dakota CSP catalog line

CFDA 10.924 is Conservation Stewardship Program. North Dakota (ND) is the place-of-performance state. Their intersection is $203,208,499.82 and 1,163 records. A 10.924 award tagged to South Dakota or Minnesota is not here. A North Dakota Medicare or crop-insurance row is a different CFDA. This page does not add those programs to the CSP total.

1,163 awards against $203,208,499.82 yields a mean of about $174,727.86 per record. That mean is arithmetic on packet facts, not a typical contract payment and not a typical farm’s annual conservation check. CSP is often stored as many producer-level or contract-level rows rather than a handful of state vehicles. This packet does not name the producers of the 1,163 rows.

Bismarck did not “win” $203,208,499.82 by appearing as a geography code. USDA did not “choose North Dakota” in a sense this extract can prove. Correlation of 10.924 with ND is not causation. The overlay Conservation Stewardship Program in North Dakota is the live table.

Conservation Stewardship as a USAspending.gov catalog title

The official title is CONSERVATION STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM. SpendingVault does not grade North Dakota’s soil-health outcomes, its grassland inventory, or its CRP adjacency. $203,208,499.82 is an obligation sum, not a conservation report card. CFDA 10.924 is the national hub without the North Dakota filter. This packet has no national CSP total, so none is quoted.

NRCS CSP contract reports, FSA acreage files, and Census of Agriculture tables are other series. They are not the 1,163 USAspending.gov awards. Mixing an acre count from those files with this join would invent a per-acre dollar figure the packet does not support.

North Dakota’s statewide book besides 10.924

North Dakota federal spending covers every CFDA coded to the state. North Dakota programs is the catalog directory. $203,208,499.82 is one cell. Quoting it as North Dakota’s entire federal farm book would drop Medicare Hospital Insurance and every other line that also hits the state.

Place-of-performance North Dakota on a CSP vehicle is often a producer address, an NRCS office, or another tagged location. It is not a map of which fields are enrolled. This packet has no county, no HUC, and no crop split of the $203,208,499.82.

Obligation versus conservation payments already mailed

An obligation is a recorded commitment. An outlay is a payment. $203,208,499.82 is the commitment figure. NRCS payment files and producer deposits are payment-side stories. This page does not convert the 1,163 awards into those cash flows.

Bismarck budget documents and state agriculture reports answer other questions. They are not the source of this USAspending.gov cell. Keep the citation on CFDA aggregates by place of performance state.

How to cite the 10.924–North Dakota join

Cite: Conservation Stewardship Program (CFDA 10.924) obligated $203,208,499.82 on 1,163 awards coded to North Dakota, per USAspending.gov. Keep both keys. Keep “obligations.” Do not invent a fiscal year. All spending ties stores this pair with other program-by-state pages.

Later bulk files can move the dollars and the 1,163-award count. Prefer the overlay Conservation Stewardship Program in North Dakota when the live table and this snapshot diverge.

What 1,163 rows will not be asked to prove

This page will not treat 1,163 awards as 1,163 farms, 1,163 acres, or 1,163 counties. It will not compute a per-acre CSP figure because the packet has no acreage. It will not rank North Dakota against other states on conservation. Peer totals are not in these facts.

Medicare Hospital Insurance and other North Dakota joins remain outside $203,208,499.82. North Dakota federal spending, North Dakota programs, CFDA 10.924, and All spending ties are the parent hubs. None of them recasts this join as a grade of North Dakota farming or as an outlay.

The mean of about $174,727.86 per record is closer to a contract-sized number than the multi-billion means on Medicare cells, but it is still not a typical producer check. There is no contract-size distribution here. There is $203,208,499.82 and 1,163 awards. That is the entire numeric claim. Keep both the program name and North Dakota in every citation sentence.

A second trap is collapsing CSP into every USDA conservation title that also hits North Dakota. EQIP, CRP, and other codes are different CFDAs unless they also carry 10.924. Keep Conservation Stewardship on its own 1,163-award line.

Questions

How much Conservation Stewardship is obligated in North Dakota?

USAspending.gov records $203,208,499.82 in CFDA 10.924 obligations across 1,163 awards coded to North Dakota. That is a program × state join, not an outlay and not the state’s full federal total.

Is 1,163 a count of North Dakota farms?

No. It is an award-row count. $203,208,499.82 ÷ 1,163 is about $174,727.86 per record as a mean, not a typical producer payment. Farm counts live in other USDA publications.

Does this measure acres enrolled in CSP?

No. The packet has no acreage field. $203,208,499.82 and 1,163 awards are USAspending.gov obligation records for CFDA 10.924 with a North Dakota geography tag.

Where is the live overlay?

Conservation Stewardship Program in North Dakota is the overlay. See North Dakota federal spending, North Dakota programs, CFDA 10.924, and All spending ties. Later ingests override this snapshot.