Crop Insurance funding in Minnesota 6th District (MN-06)

MN-06 × 10.450 is a crop-insurance join, not a farm ranking

This page is a join: Crop Insurance and Minnesota 6th District (MN-06). $1,540,026,852 is the obligation sum on awards that carry both the CFDA 10.450 tag and congressional-district place of performance MN-06. It is not Minnesota’s statewide Crop Insurance book, not the nationwide program total, and not a county yield ranking or a farm-bill scorecard. Minnesota 6th District is the district parent. CFDA 10.450 is the program parent. Correlation is not causation.

16 is an award-action count. Modifications can add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished, and this page will not invent contractors. Dividing $1,540,026,852 by 16 yields about $96,251,678.25 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical policy premium or a typical acre indemnity. FEC contribution tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Crop Insurance is a USDA catalog line. This page will not invent companies or townships.

Crop Insurance as a catalog title, not an RMA county file

The official catalog title is CROP INSURANCE. SpendingVault does not grade Minnesota 6th District (MN-06) on Crop Insurance, backlog, or policy. $1,540,026,852 is an obligation sum, not a verdict. CFDA 10.450 without the district filter is the national hub; this packet has no national total, so none is quoted. Commodity, conservation, or disaster farm listings remain outside $1,540,026,852.

RMA summary of business files and NASS acreage reports are other series. They are not the 16 awards on USAspending.gov. Mixing a census from those files with this join would invent a per-unit dollar figure the packet does not support. Premium-support and county-yield folklore is ordinary speech, not a packet field. Commodity and conservation listings use other CFDAs. This packet has no acreage table.

Minnesota 6th District besides CFDA 10.450

Minnesota 6th District (MN-06) is the geography side. Place of performance MN-06 is a coding field in the award file. It does not prove residency of beneficiaries, students, patients, or vendors. Minnesota federal spending is the statewide parent and includes other districts. St. Cloud–exurban speech is not a township map. Neighboring MN-07 crop-insurance cells stay outside. A Crop Insurance award tagged to MN-07 or MN-08 is not here.

The district’s all-program obligation total is $4,354,219,258.74. $1,540,026,852 is the Crop Insurance slice of that book, about 35.4%. Remaining district dollars sit with other CFDAs on Minnesota 6th District, not inside this join. Quoting $1,540,026,852 as Minnesota 6th District (MN-06)’s entire federal book would drop every other catalog line.

Sixteen awards, not sixteen farms

16 awards against $1,540,026,852 implies about $96,251,678.25 per award. That mean is not a unit price and not a typical policy premium or a typical acre indemnity. Crop-insurance premium-support and related awards can dominate dollars while the row count stays at 16. 16 rows can include continuations and amendments. Treat the count as records in an aggregate, not as 16 finished projects or 16 people. All spending ties lists other district-by-program pairs on the same obligation metric.

Premium-support obligations versus indemnities already paid

An obligation is a recorded commitment. An outlay is a payment from the Treasury. $1,540,026,852 is the commitment figure. This packet has no outlay total and no fiscal-year split, so none is invented. Citing the figure as cash already spent in Minnesota 6th District (MN-06) over-reads the field. Do not rank Minnesota 6th District (MN-06) as a winner or loser versus other districts. Keep both sides in the citation: Crop Insurance (CFDA 10.450) and Minnesota 6th District (MN-06).

Budget documents from the district’s St. Cloud–exurban communities and Minnesota appropriations answer other questions. They are not the source of this cell. If a chart mixes General Fund activity with CFDA 10.450 in MN-06, the chart has left the federal award series. The northwest Twin Cities fringe as speech only did not receive $1,540,026,852 as a named metro in this packet.

How to cite the 10.450 × MN-06 pair

Cite: Crop Insurance (CFDA 10.450) obligated $1,540,026,852 on 16 awards coded to Minnesota 6th District (MN-06), per USAspending.gov. Keep both keys. Keep the word obligations. Open Minnesota 6th District for the district rollup, CFDA 10.450 for the program rollup, Minnesota federal spending for Minnesota statewide spending, and All spending ties for other pairs. Later bulk files can move the dollars and the 16-award count; prefer those tables when the live overlay and this snapshot diverge. None of those links convert this cell into a county yield ranking or a farm-bill scorecard, into outlays this packet omits, or into a contractor list.

Questions

How much Crop Insurance funding is obligated in Minnesota 6th District (MN-06)?

USAspending.gov records $1,540,026,852 in CFDA 10.450 obligations with Minnesota 6th District (MN-06) place of performance across 16 awards. That is a program × district join, not an outlay and not Minnesota’s full federal total.

Do 16 awards mean 16 local acre, policy,s?

No. 16 is an award-action count and can include modifications. Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $96,251,678.25 per award, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical policy premium or a typical acre indemnity.

Is this Minnesota 6th District (MN-06)’s entire federal spending total?

No. $1,540,026,852 is only the Crop Insurance slice tagged to Minnesota 6th District (MN-06), about 35.4% of the district’s $4,354,219,258.74 all-program total. Minnesota federal spending is the statewide parent. Other CFDAs on Minnesota 6th District sit outside this join.

Where are the live MN-06 and CFDA 10.450 tables?

Minnesota 6th District is the district parent. CFDA 10.450 is the CFDA 10.450 hub. Minnesota federal spending is the Minnesota parent. All spending ties lists other pairs. Prefer those tables after later ingests; this page quotes 10.450 × MN-06 at $1,540,026,852.