Denali Commission federal obligations in Alaska

Commission 513 meeting Alaska

Denali Commission as awarding agency, Alaska as place-of-performance: 178 records summing to $127,052,176.51. A Denali Commission award coded outside AK is out. An award in Alaska from a different awarding agency is out even if the topic sounds related. Alaska (AK) excludes Washington and Hawaii, stored as other state keys. A Fairbanks-coded award with a Washington place-of-performance tag is a different cell.

178 awards against $127,052,176.51 is a 178-award regional-commission file, thicker than a one-row join. Unique recipients are unpublished. Do not read 178 as 178 unique village censuses, named infrastructure sites, or mile-marker lists. Denali Commission in Alaska is the both-keys table. Alaska federal spending is the all-agency state hub. Denali Commission is the agency book without an AK filter. All spending ties lists other joins.

The Commission’s statutory region is not a packet field. The join is awarding-agency 513 × AK only. Correlation is not causation: Alaska did not cause $127,052,176.51 by existing as a large or small place. Population and outcome scores are not packet facts. The join is 513 × AK only.

Denali is an awarding agency, not a mountain census

$127,052,176.51 does not measure village censuses, named infrastructure sites, or mile-marker lists. Those series are not USAspending fields on this aggregate. The cell sums award obligations with awarding-agency code 513 and an AK place-of-performance tag.

Do not treat 178 awards as a census of village censuses, named infrastructure sites, or mile-marker lists. Parent hubs are supposed to be larger than this pair. If Alaska federal spending or Denali Commission matched $127,052,176.51 and 178, the join would be pointless. Use the overlay when both keys must stay on. Neighboring-state Denali Commission joins are other pairs, not addends.

Alaska statewide, not a borough list

Place of performance AK is a geography tag on the award, not a metro list and not a commuting zone. Alaska (AK) excludes Washington and Hawaii, stored as other state keys. A Fairbanks-coded award with a Washington place-of-performance tag is a different cell. Recipient address can differ from that state tag.

This packet does not split $127,052,176.51 by city, county, or named facility. 178 awards stay statewide. A county table would be a different extract. Campaign-finance filings do not fund these USAspending obligations.

One hundred seventy-eight obligations

Even a thick or thin file records obligations, not necessarily outlays. $127,052,176.51 can include amounts that pay on a later schedule. Citing it as cash already sent in Alaska confuses two concepts. Deobligations and upward adjustments both move the total.

Alaska’s own budget is a different ledger. Mixing it with the 178 awards USAspending file leaves this series. No fiscal year is published in this packet, so this page does not invent one. Keep the obligation label on $127,052,176.51. Sharing a geography with Denali Commission does not mean FEC donations funded these awards.

Citing the Denali Commission in Alaska

Cite USAspending.gov: Denali Commission (agency 513) obligated $127,052,176.51 on 178 awards coded to Alaska. Name both sides. Keep “obligations.” Do not relabel the total as village censuses, named infrastructure sites, or mile-marker lists.

Prefer Denali Commission in Alaska if the overlay has refreshed after an ingest. Alaska federal spending still includes every other awarding agency tagged to AK. Denali Commission is the 513 parent without the AK filter. All spending ties indexes other pairs. Do not add those parents into $127,052,176.51.

A usable footnote names Denali Commission, Alaska, $127,052,176.51, and 178. The compact headline $127.1M is that same dollar total rounded. It is not a second extract. The implied mean near $713,776.27 is $127,052,176.51 divided by 178. Means are not medians. USAspending.gov remains the originating system.

A regional commission is still a two-key join

The Denali Commission exists as awarding-agency 513 on USAspending. Village energy and clinic folklore are unpublished. PBGC in Alaska is a different agency on the same state hub; do not add $127,052,176.51 to that one-award pension cell. One hundred seventy-eight awards stay statewide, not a borough census.

Questions

How much has Denali Commission obligated in Alaska?

USAspending.gov records $127,052,176.51 across 178 awards with awarding agency 513 and a Alaska tag. That is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Alaska’s full federal book. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. The join is a catalog intersection, not a budget.

Does 178 awards mean 178 Alaska villages?

No. $127,052,176.51 is an obligation sum on awarding-agency 513 × AK. It does not measure village censuses, named infrastructure sites, or mile-marker lists. Those series are not fields on this aggregate. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Why does this Denali Commission file have 178 awards?

178 is an award-record count, including possible continuations and modifications. Dividing $127,052,176.51 by 178 yields about $713,776.27 as a mean, not a typical project. Unique recipients are unpublished. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov.

Where is the live table for Denali Commission in Alaska?

Denali Commission in Alaska is the overlay for both keys. Alaska federal spending is the all-agency Alaska hub. Denali Commission is the agency parent. All spending ties indexes other spending ties. Prefer the overlay when both filters must stay on.