Denali Commission Program federal funding in Alaska

Alaska joined to CFDA 90.100

Two tables meet: a CFDA program and a place-of-performance state. $127,052,176.51 is the intersection. It is not Alaska’s entire federal inflow and not the nationwide 90.100 book. FEC donations do not fund these USAspending obligations. Correlation is not causation.

Filtered overlay: Denali Commission Program in Alaska. Program without state: CFDA 90.100. State without program: Alaska federal spending. Other Alaska programs: Alaska programs. Other pairs: All spending ties. Do not add those parents into $127,052,176.51.

Denali Commission as a listing, not a village census

DENALI COMMISSION PROGRAM names the listing. $127,052,176.51 does not measure a statewide infrastructure budget or a jobs count. This packet lists no award recipients and no contractor names. Confusing the cell with other independent-agency catalog lines that use different CFDA numbers would be a different extract. DENALI COMMISSION PROGRAM is a mid-size independent-agency file: 178 awards is not 178 named Alaska villages. The packet lists no community names, no project titles, and no contractor names. Awards coded to Washington stay outside this Alaska cell even if a vendor’s mailroom is in Anchorage. Do not invent a fiscal year. Recipients stay unpublished.

Alaska place of performance on 90.100

Alaska (AK) is statewide. Anchorage, Fairbanks, or Juneau share the stamp. Awards coded to Washington and Oregon, stored as other state keys stay out. The code is not a county map and not a proof that Alaska won or lost federal money.

One hundred seventy-eight awards, not 178 named communities

Treat 178 as a record count, not 178 villages, projects, or named communities. The implied mean of about $713,776.27 is a quotient, not a typical Denali Commission Program invoice. Modifications can thicken the list. Unique recipients are unpublished.

Citing Denali Commission dollars in Alaska

Quote Denali Commission Program and Alaska together. $127,052,176.51 is obligations, not outlays. Later bulk files can move the dollars. Prefer live tables at /states/ak/programs/90.100/, /programs/90.100/, /states/ak/, /states/ak/programs/, and /ties/ after later ingests. Cite CFDA 90.100, AK, 178 awards, USAspending.gov.

Limits of the 90.100 × AK overlay

This page exists because two tables meet: Denali Commission Program (CFDA 90.100) and Alaska place of performance. $127,052,176.51 is the obligation field on that pair. One hundred seventy-eight awards remain a USAspending record count, not 178 villages, projects, or named communities. The packet does not publish outlays, remaining balances, recipient names, contractor names, or a fiscal year. FEC donations do not fund these USAspending obligations. Correlation is not causation.

Neighbor codes (Washington and Oregon, stored as other state keys) stay outside $127,052,176.51. Anchorage, Fairbanks, or Juneau are in-state address examples, not packet splits. Sibling catalogs such as other independent-agency catalog lines that use different CFDA numbers are other extracts. Reuse $127,052,176.51 only with both join sides named. Prefer live tables at /states/ak/programs/90.100/, /programs/90.100/, /states/ak/, /states/ak/programs/, and /ties/ after later ingests. Cite USAspending.gov, CFDA 90.100, AK, 178 awards, obligations only.

Keep Denali Commission Program and Alaska together when citing $127,052,176.51.

CFDA 90.100 lists 178 award records on this AK join.

Obligations of $127,052,176.51 are not outlays.

Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this CFDA 90.100 × AK pair.

Do not add parent hubs into this state-program cell.

Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations.

Unique recipients remain unpublished on this Denali Commission Program Alaska join.

Agency splits are omitted from this packet.

Quote CFDA 90.100, Alaska, and $127,052,176.51 in one sentence.

The Alaska programs index and All spending ties index are larger than this cell.

A later USAspending ingest can restate $127,052,176.51 without changing the join keys.

This page is not a village census, a project roster, or a named-community file.

178 award records are not 178 villages, projects, or named communities.

Mean dollars per action remain about $713,776.27 if you divide those two facts.

AK is place of performance, not a split of Anchorage, Fairbanks, or Juneau.

Questions

How much Denali Commission Program funding is obligated in Alaska?

USAspending.gov records $127,052,176.51 in CFDA 90.100 obligations with Alaska place of performance on 178 awards. That is the pair total, not an outlay and not a village census, a project roster, or a named-community file. Keep Denali Commission Program and Alaska together when citing $127,052,176.51.

Do 178 awards mean 178 Alaska villages?

No. 178 is a USAspending award-record count, not 178 villages, projects, or named communities. The implied mean is about $713,776.27 per award. Unique recipients are unpublished. Obligations of $127,052,176.51 are not outlays. USAspending.gov remains the source for this 90.100 × AK pair.

Is this Alaska’s full federal independent-agency spend?

No. $127,052,176.51 is only the CFDA 90.100 × Alaska cell. Other catalogs appear on separate Alaska program pages. Nationwide 90.100 is not limited to Alaska. Mixing this listing with other independent-agency catalog lines that use different CFDA numbers would invent a larger total.

Where is the live 90.100 × Alaska table?

Denali Commission Program in Alaska is the overlay at /states/ak/programs/90.100/. CFDA 90.100 is /programs/90.100/. Alaska federal spending is /states/ak/. Alaska programs is /states/ak/programs/. All spending ties is /ties/. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov for this 90.100 × AK pair.