Department of Agriculture in Idaho 2nd District (ID-02)
USAspending.gov records $1,019,221,712.90 in Department of Agriculture obligations with place of performance in Idaho 2nd District (ID-02). That awarding-agency 012 cell is 3.4% of the district's $29,961,789,219.71 published book. The join lists 5,498 award records—a long action file beside a nine-figure total, not 5,498 named farms. This page reports the pair, not a ranking of Idaho districts.
Key figures
- USAspending records $1,019,221,712.90 in Agriculture obligations in ID-02 (agency 012).
- That cell is 3.4% of the district's $29,961,789,219.71 book, on 5,498 award records.
- 5,498 rows are a long action list, not a unique-farm census.
- The total is commitments, not outlays. FEC donations do not fund this cell.
Agriculture × ID-02 is a high-count join
Agency 012 and Idaho 2nd District (ID-02) meet in one place-of-performance cell. $1,019,221,712.90 is the obligation sum tagged to that pair. It is not the district's full $29,961,789,219.71 book, not every Agriculture dollar in Idaho, and not an outlay. The Idaho 2nd District hub still lists other awarding agencies; the Department of Agriculture hub still lists other districts.
5,498 rows can reflect many assistance instruments, modifications, or repeated vehicles; the packet does not say which. Treating the count as 5,498 unique farms invents a census. 3.4% of the district book is a modest slice in a large $29,961,789,219.71 parent. Correlation with crop-year news is not causation.
ID-02's district book beside agency 012
3.4% of $29,961,789,219.71 is tagged to Department of Agriculture in this extract. Other awarding agencies fill the rest of Idaho 2nd District. Adding those rows into $1,019,221,712.90 would double-count. The Idaho 2nd District page at /districts/ID-02/ is the parent without an agency-012 filter.
Department of Agriculture at /agencies/012/ drops the ID-02 filter. Idaho federal spending at /states/id/ drops the district cut. All spending ties at /ties/ indexes other pairs. Do not treat $1,019,221,712.90 as statewide Agriculture obligations.
5,498 records are not a farm census
5,498 is the join award-record count, not unique recipients. Dividing $1,019,221,712.90 by 5,498 would invent a typical payment the packet never computed. Named producers remain unpublished. Keep the long row count on the join.
What Agriculture in ID-02 omits
No outlays, no commodity table, no named producers, no FEC overlay. Campaign donations do not fund these USAspending obligations. Place of performance is a geography tag, not proof that a USDA state office sits in ID-02. Keep agency 012 and Idaho 2nd District on the same citation as $1,019,221,712.90.
Citing Agriculture in Idaho 2nd District
Name Department of Agriculture (agency 012), Idaho 2nd District (ID-02), $1,019,221,712.90 in obligations, and 5,498 award records on USAspending.gov. Quote /districts/ID-02/ for every awarding agency in ID-02 and /agencies/012/ for agency 012 without a district filter.
Reuse $1,019,221,712.90 only as Department of Agriculture obligations with place of performance in ID-02. Filings remain on USAspending.gov. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset. Obligations of $1,019,221,712.90 are not outlays. Keep Department of Agriculture (agency 012) and Idaho 2nd District (ID-02) together when citing $1,019,221,712.90. The 5,498 award-record count is the join field, not a unique-vendor census. Obligations of $1,019,221,712.90 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Do not add the district parent of $29,961,789,219.71 into this agency-012 cell. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Place of performance in ID-02 is a geography tag, not a contractor roster. 3.4% is the published share of $29,961,789,219.71 tagged to Department of Agriculture in this extract. Other awarding agencies on the Idaho 2nd District hub sit outside $1,019,221,712.90. Reuse the figure only as the 012 × ID-02 obligation join. Later USAspending ingests can restate $1,019,221,712.90. Cite the pair as commitments, not as checks already cleared in Idaho. The All spending ties index holds other keys. The join remains Department of Agriculture (agency 012) with place of performance in Idaho 2nd District (ID-02). $1,019,221,712.90 is the obligation total; 5,498 is the award-record count; $29,961,789,219.71 is the district parent. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays. The join remains Department of Agriculture (agency 012) with place of performance in Idaho 2nd District (ID-02). $1,019,221,712.90 is the obligation total; 5,498 is the award-record count; $29,961,789,219.71 is the district parent. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.
Questions
- How much did Agriculture obligate in Idaho 2nd District?
- USAspending.gov shows $1,019,221,712.90 in Department of Agriculture obligations with place of performance in Idaho 2nd District (ID-02). The sum is a commitment total, not outlays and not the district's $29,961,789,219.71 book. Other agencies in ID-02 sit outside this join.
- Do 5,498 awards equal 5,498 farms in ID-02?
- No. 5,498 is the join award-record count, a long action list, not unique farms. The packet names no recipients. Keep agency 012 and ID-02 together when citing the cell. Filings remain on USAspending.gov. 5,498 is the join award-record count, not a unique-recipient census.
- Is Agriculture most of Idaho 2nd District spending?
- No. Agency 012 is 3.4% of the district's $29,961,789,219.71 published book. Other awarding agencies remain on the Idaho 2nd District hub. Do not add those rows into $1,019,221,712.90. Obligations of $1,019,221,712.90 are not outlays.
- Did FEC donations fund these Agriculture awards?
- No. $1,019,221,712.90 is a USAspending obligation aggregate. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset and do not fund these awards. Outlays are unpublished. Cite agency 012 plus Idaho 2nd District (ID-02). USAspending.gov remains the source for agency 012 in ID-02.
USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.