How much USDA spending is coded to Indiana 9th District (IN-09)?

USAspending.gov lists $820,685,327.75 in Department of Agriculture obligations across 5,240 awards with place of performance in Indiana 9th District (IN-09). Agency 012 × IN-09 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Indiana’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 10.8% of the district’s published total ($7,584,573,581.03). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $156,619.34, a ratio of those two facts only.

Does $820,685,327.75 include every USDA program in IN-09?

The packet publishes one awarding-agency rollup. The packet does not split USDA programs or contract versus assistance instruments. $820,685,327.75 is the combined obligation sum for agency 012 inside IN-09 coding. This page will not invent a program pie or name contractors. Open Department of Agriculture and Indiana 9th District to inspect parent tables. 5,240 remains an action count, not a program count.

Is $820,685,327.75 cash already paid in Indiana 9th District (IN-09)?

No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $820,685,327.75 as checks already cleared in Indiana 9th District (IN-09) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 5,240 awards. Prefer the live district and agency hubs if the tables moved.

Where is the live USDA–IN-09 table?

Indiana 9th District is the district parent and Department of Agriculture is the agency parent. Indiana federal spending covers Indiana without the district×agency intersection as the headline. All spending ties lists other pairs. Those hubs are not addends. Keep both sides of the join when citing $820,685,327.75. Place of performance is IN-09. Obligations are not outlays.

← All data ties

USDA obligations in Indiana 9th District (IN-09)

USAspending.gov records $820,685,327.75 in Department of Agriculture (agency 012) obligations with place of performance in Indiana 9th District (IN-09), across 5,240 awards. Five thousand two hundred forty USDA-coded awards cover about eleven percent of IN-09’s district obligation total. Indiana 7th District’s GSA cell is a different geography and a different awarding-agency code. That pair is Department of Agriculture and Indiana 9th District (IN-09) — not Indiana’s entire federal inflow, not Department of Agriculture nationwide, and not cash already paid. The cell is 10.8% of this district’s published obligation total ($7,584,573,581.03). Implied average obligation is about $156,619.34 ($820,685,327.75 ÷ 5,240). Correlation is not causation.

Key figures

USDA in Indiana 9th District (IN-09): $820,685,327.75 across 5,240 USAspending awards.
Implied mean about $156,619.34 per record; district share 10.8% of $7,584,573,581.03.
Agency 012 × IN-09 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a named-recipient list.
Cite USAspending.gov; quote Indiana 9th District and Department of Agriculture if live tables moved.
Indiana federal spending and All spending ties are parents and an index, not amounts to add into $820,685,327.75.

What the USDA–IN-09 join is

Awarding agency 012 and congressional district IN-09 meet here. $820,685,327.75 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Department of Agriculture’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to Indiana 9th District (IN-09), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split USDA programs or contract versus assistance instruments. 5,240 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a farm census, a crop-acreage file, or a named-grantee file.

Dividing $820,685,327.75 by 5,240 yields about $156,619.34 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical contract, grant, or benefit line. 5,240 awards is a thick USDA file. Volume pulls the implied mean down. It is not a farm census. Do not treat IN-09’s 012 cell as a synonym for every USDA account nationwide. Open Indiana 9th District for the district table without this agency filter, Department of Agriculture for agency 012 without a IN-09 filter, Indiana federal spending for every awarding agency in the Indiana extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $820,685,327.75.

Awarding agency 012 as the USDA side

USAspending labels awarding agency 012 as Department of Agriculture. That code produced $820,685,327.75 when crossed with Indiana 9th District (IN-09) place of performance. The agency-wide 012 hub does not require IN-09 geography. The district hub does not require USDA. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 5,240 awards. The packet does not split USDA programs or contract versus assistance instruments.

Correlation is not causation: Indiana 9th District (IN-09) did not “cause” $820,685,327.75 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 012 × IN-09 only. It is not a farm census, a crop-acreage file, or a named-grantee file. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

Indiana 9th District (IN-09) as place of performance

Indiana 9th District (IN-09) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list IN-09 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other Indiana districts belong on those ties even when the awarding agency is also 012. Indiana 9th District (IN-09) is a numbered congressional place-of-performance code inside Indiana. Other Indiana districts are separate joins even when they reuse awarding-agency 012. Indiana 9th District (IN-09) is not Indiana 7th District. Agency 012 is Department of Agriculture, not GSA agency 047. Do not fold IN-07’s general-services dollars into this USDA total.

Indiana federal spending shows how agency 012 sits beside other awarding agencies in the same state extract. $820,685,327.75 is one district-agency column, not the state table. This packet does not split Indiana 9th District (IN-09) by county, city, or census tract. Awards that carry a different awarding-agency code stay on those other ties even if the work sounds related to Department of Agriculture. The district-wide obligation total published here is $7,584,573,581.03; $820,685,327.75 is the USDA slice of that denominator.

Obligations, not outlays

USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $820,685,327.75 is that kind of sum for Department of Agriculture inside IN-09 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same awarding-agency rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $820,685,327.75 as given.

Indiana’s own budget is a separate ledger. Mixing it with the 5,240-row USDA cell leaves USAspending.gov. Treat 5,240 as award records in the aggregate, not unique vendors. Do not annualize without a year field in the packet. Do not per-capita or per-recipient the dollar total; those denominators are unpublished. The implied mean ($156,619.34) is a concentration statistic, not a typical IN-09 USDA payment.

How to cite USDA in IN-09

Cite USAspending.gov: Department of Agriculture (agency 012) obligated $820,685,327.75 on 5,240 awards coded to Indiana 9th District (IN-09). Name Department of Agriculture and Indiana 9th District (IN-09) together. Keep the obligation word. If Indiana 9th District or Department of Agriculture has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a farm census, a crop-acreage file, or a named-grantee file. 10.8% of $7,584,573,581.03 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score.

Keep Department of Agriculture, Indiana 9th District (IN-09), $820,685,327.75, and 5,240 awards together. All spending ties indexes other pairs. Department of Agriculture is the 012 parent without a IN-09 filter. Indiana federal spending is the Indiana parent. Do not add those parents to this cell. Sharing a district with USDA does not mean campaign donations funded these awards, and it does not convert obligations into outlays. This page reports one USAspending join.

Reading a thick USDA file in IN-09

5,240 awards is a thick USDA file. Volume pulls the implied mean down. It is not a farm census. A large row count makes a program split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $156,619.34) and the district share (10.8% of $7,584,573,581.03) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer Indiana 9th District and Department of Agriculture if the live tables moved.

Do not rank Indiana 9th District (IN-09) as more USDA-dependent than neighboring districts on the strength of this cell alone. Neighboring geographies have their own 012 ties with different dollar totals, or no published 012 cell in this harvest. This snapshot holds $820,685,327.75 and 5,240 only. All spending ties is the index, not an addend. Obligations are not outlays. Correlation is not causation.

Questions

How much USDA spending is coded to Indiana 9th District (IN-09)?: USAspending.gov lists $820,685,327.75 in Department of Agriculture obligations across 5,240 awards with place of performance in Indiana 9th District (IN-09). Agency 012 × IN-09 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Indiana’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 10.8% of the district’s published total ($7,584,573,581.03). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $156,619.34, a ratio of those two facts only.
Does $820,685,327.75 include every USDA program in IN-09?: The packet publishes one awarding-agency rollup. The packet does not split USDA programs or contract versus assistance instruments. $820,685,327.75 is the combined obligation sum for agency 012 inside IN-09 coding. This page will not invent a program pie or name contractors. Open Department of Agriculture and Indiana 9th District to inspect parent tables. 5,240 remains an action count, not a program count.
Is $820,685,327.75 cash already paid in Indiana 9th District (IN-09)?: No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $820,685,327.75 as checks already cleared in Indiana 9th District (IN-09) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 5,240 awards. Prefer the live district and agency hubs if the tables moved.
Where is the live USDA–IN-09 table?: Indiana 9th District is the district parent and Department of Agriculture is the agency parent. Indiana federal spending covers Indiana without the district×agency intersection as the headline. All spending ties lists other pairs. Those hubs are not addends. Keep both sides of the join when citing $820,685,327.75. Place of performance is IN-09. Obligations are not outlays.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.