Department of Agriculture in Minnesota 3rd District (MN-03)
USAspending.gov records $1,238,823,641.26 in Department of Agriculture obligations with place of performance in Minnesota 3rd District (MN-03). That awarding-agency 012 cell is 21.0% of the district's $5,911,082,525.30 published book. The join lists 108 award records. This page reports the pair, not a ranking of Minnesota districts and not a roster of named producers.
Key figures
- USAspending records $1,238,823,641.26 in Agriculture obligations in MN-03 (agency 012).
- That cell is 21.0% of the district's $5,911,082,525.30 book.
- 108 award records are not a unique-farm census.
- The total is commitments, not outlays. FEC donations do not fund this cell.
Agriculture × MN-03 is a district-share cell
Agency 012 and Minnesota 3rd District (MN-03) meet in one place-of-performance cell. $1,238,823,641.26 is the obligation sum tagged to that pair. It is not the district's full $5,911,082,525.30 book, not every Agriculture dollar in Minnesota, and not an outlay. The Minnesota 3rd District hub still lists other awarding agencies; the Department of Agriculture hub still lists other districts.
21.0% of the district book is a large slice for one awarding agency, still not a farm census. 108 rows are not 108 unique farms. Commodity and conservation splits are unpublished. A suburban-district label does not change the packet: geography is place of performance, not a crop-acre inventory. Correlation with local food-system news is not causation.
MN-03's district book beside agency 012
21.0% of $5,911,082,525.30 is tagged to Department of Agriculture in this extract. Other awarding agencies fill the remainder of Minnesota 3rd District. Adding those rows into $1,238,823,641.26 would double-count. The Minnesota 3rd District page at /districts/MN-03/ is the parent without an agency-012 filter.
Department of Agriculture at /agencies/012/ drops the MN-03 filter. Minnesota federal spending at /states/mn/ drops the district cut. All spending ties at /ties/ indexes other pairs. Do not treat $1,238,823,641.26 as statewide Agriculture obligations or as cash already paid.
108 records are not unique producers
108 is the join award-record count, not unique recipients. Dividing $1,238,823,641.26 by 108 would invent a typical payment the packet never computed. Named producers and processors are unpublished. Keep the row count on the join.
What Agriculture in MN-03 omits
No outlays, no commodity table, no named producers, no FEC overlay. Campaign donations do not fund these USAspending obligations. Place of performance is a geography tag, not proof that a USDA state office sits in MN-03. Keep agency 012 and Minnesota 3rd District on the same citation as $1,238,823,641.26.
Citing Agriculture in Minnesota 3rd District
Name Department of Agriculture (agency 012), Minnesota 3rd District (MN-03), $1,238,823,641.26 in obligations, and 108 award records on USAspending.gov. Quote /districts/MN-03/ for every awarding agency in MN-03 and /agencies/012/ for agency 012 without a district filter.
Reuse $1,238,823,641.26 only as Department of Agriculture obligations with place of performance in MN-03. Filings remain on USAspending.gov. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset. Obligations of $1,238,823,641.26 are not outlays. Keep Department of Agriculture (agency 012) and Minnesota 3rd District (MN-03) together when citing $1,238,823,641.26. The 108 award-record count is the join field, not a unique-vendor census. Obligations of $1,238,823,641.26 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Do not add the district parent of $5,911,082,525.30 into this agency-012 cell. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Place of performance in MN-03 is a geography tag, not a contractor roster. 21.0% is the published share of $5,911,082,525.30 tagged to Department of Agriculture in this extract. Other awarding agencies on the Minnesota 3rd District hub sit outside $1,238,823,641.26. Reuse the figure only as the 012 × MN-03 obligation join. Later USAspending ingests can restate $1,238,823,641.26. Cite the pair as commitments, not as checks already cleared in Minnesota. The All spending ties index holds other keys. The join remains Department of Agriculture (agency 012) with place of performance in Minnesota 3rd District (MN-03). $1,238,823,641.26 is the obligation total; 108 is the award-record count; $5,911,082,525.30 is the district parent. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays. The join remains Department of Agriculture (agency 012) with place of performance in Minnesota 3rd District (MN-03). $1,238,823,641.26 is the obligation total; 108 is the award-record count; $5,911,082,525.30 is the district parent. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.
Questions
- How much did Agriculture obligate in Minnesota 3rd District?
- USAspending.gov shows $1,238,823,641.26 in Department of Agriculture obligations with place of performance in Minnesota 3rd District (MN-03). The sum is a commitment total, not outlays and not the district's $5,911,082,525.30 book. Other agencies in MN-03 sit outside this join.
- Do 108 awards equal 108 farms in MN-03?
- No. 108 is the join award-record count, not unique farms. The packet names no recipients. Dividing $1,238,823,641.26 by 108 is not a published typical payment. Keep agency 012 and MN-03 together when citing the cell.
- Is Agriculture most of Minnesota 3rd District spending?
- Agency 012 is 21.0% of the district's $5,911,082,525.30 published book—a large slice, still not the whole district. Other awarding agencies remain on the Minnesota 3rd District hub. Do not add those rows into $1,238,823,641.26.
- Did FEC donations fund these Agriculture awards?
- No. $1,238,823,641.26 is a USAspending obligation aggregate. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset and do not fund these awards. Outlays are unpublished. Cite agency 012 plus Minnesota 3rd District (MN-03). USAspending.gov remains the source for agency 012 in MN-03.
USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.