Skip to main content
← All data ties

USDA obligations in Minnesota 7th District (MN-07)

Place-of-performance MN-07 crossed with Department of Agriculture (agency 012) yields $934,789,204.26 in USAspending.gov obligations on 54,952 awards. Fifty-four thousand nine hundred fifty-two USDA-coded awards — the thickest action file in this slice — still resolve to a single awarding-agency total inside MN-07, about fifteen percent of the district’s published obligations. That pair is Department of Agriculture and Minnesota 7th District (MN-07) — not Minnesota’s entire federal inflow, not Department of Agriculture nationwide, and not cash already paid. The cell is 14.8% of this district’s published obligation total ($6,334,473,457.07). Implied average obligation is about $17,011.01 ($934,789,204.26 ÷ 54,952). Correlation is not causation.

Key figures

  • USDA in Minnesota 7th District (MN-07): $934,789,204.26 across 54,952 USAspending awards.
  • Implied mean about $17,011.01 per record; district share 14.8% of $6,334,473,457.07.
  • Agency 012 × MN-07 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not a named-recipient list.
  • Cite USAspending.gov; quote Minnesota 7th District and Department of Agriculture if live tables moved.
  • Minnesota federal spending and All spending ties are parents and an index, not amounts to add into $934,789,204.26.

The Minnesota 7th District (MN-07) filter on Agriculture

Awarding agency 012 and congressional district MN-07 meet here. $934,789,204.26 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Department of Agriculture’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to Minnesota 7th District (MN-07), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split USDA programs or contract versus assistance instruments. 54,952 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a farm census, a crop-acreage file, or a named-grantee file.

Dividing $934,789,204.26 by 54,952 yields about $17,011.01 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical contract, grant, or benefit line. 54,952 rows is a mass-action USDA file: assistance lines and modifications multiply records. The implied mean is pulled down by volume and is not a typical farm payment. Do not treat MN-07’s 012 cell as a synonym for every USDA account nationwide. Open Minnesota 7th District for the district table without this agency filter, Department of Agriculture for agency 012 without a MN-07 filter, Minnesota federal spending for every awarding agency in the Minnesota extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $934,789,204.26.

The Department of Agriculture awarding-agency rollup

USAspending labels awarding agency 012 as Department of Agriculture. That code produced $934,789,204.26 when crossed with Minnesota 7th District (MN-07) place of performance. The agency-wide 012 hub does not require MN-07 geography. The district hub does not require USDA. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 54,952 awards. The packet does not split USDA programs or contract versus assistance instruments.

Correlation is not causation: Minnesota 7th District (MN-07) did not “cause” $934,789,204.26 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 012 × MN-07 only. It is not a farm census, a crop-acreage file, or a named-grantee file. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

Reading the MN-07 stamp

Minnesota 7th District (MN-07) on this join is a USAspending geography field, not a claim that every dollar was disbursed to residents of that district. Awards can list MN-07 while later work occurs elsewhere. Awards tagged to other Minnesota districts belong on those ties even when the awarding agency is also 012. Minnesota 7th District (MN-07) is a numbered congressional place-of-performance code inside Minnesota. Other Minnesota districts are separate joins even when they reuse awarding-agency 012. Minnesota 7th District (MN-07) is a numbered place-of-performance code inside Minnesota. Other Minnesota districts are not added into this cell. The packet does not publish a county split inside MN-07.

Minnesota federal spending shows how agency 012 sits beside other awarding agencies in the same state extract. $934,789,204.26 is one district-agency column, not the state table. This packet does not split Minnesota 7th District (MN-07) by county, city, or census tract. Awards that carry a different awarding-agency code stay on those other ties even if the work sounds related to Department of Agriculture. The district-wide obligation total published here is $6,334,473,457.07; $934,789,204.26 is the USDA slice of that denominator.

USAspending obligations on this pair

USAspending.gov records an obligation when the federal government commits funds on an award. $934,789,204.26 is that kind of sum for Department of Agriculture inside MN-07 coding. Later deobligations, recoveries, or payment schedules can change what leaves the Treasury without this join rewriting itself into a cash register. Assistance and contract awards can share the same awarding-agency rollup; this packet does not split them. Net obligations can include downward adjustments. This page reports $934,789,204.26 as given.

Minnesota’s own budget is a separate ledger. Mixing it with the 54,952-row USDA cell leaves USAspending.gov. Treat 54,952 as award records in the aggregate, not unique vendors. Do not annualize without a year field in the packet. Do not per-capita or per-recipient the dollar total; those denominators are unpublished. The implied mean ($17,011.01) is a concentration statistic, not a typical MN-07 USDA payment.

Citing $934,789,204.26 without dropping a join side

Cite USAspending.gov: Department of Agriculture (agency 012) obligated $934,789,204.26 on 54,952 awards coded to Minnesota 7th District (MN-07). Name Department of Agriculture and Minnesota 7th District (MN-07) together. Keep the obligation word. If Minnesota 7th District or Department of Agriculture has refreshed, prefer the live hub over this snapshot for current rows. The pair is not a farm census, a crop-acreage file, or a named-grantee file. 14.8% of $6,334,473,457.07 is the district share on this packet, not a performance score.

Row count versus dollar concentration

54,952 rows is a mass-action USDA file: assistance lines and modifications multiply records. The implied mean is pulled down by volume and is not a typical farm payment. A large row count makes a program split tempting; the packet still does not supply one. A small row count makes a named-facility story tempting; the packet still does not name facilities or contractors. The implied mean (about $17,011.01) and the district share (14.8% of $6,334,473,457.07) are ratios of packet facts. Prefer Minnesota 7th District and Department of Agriculture if the live tables moved.

Questions

How much USDA spending is coded to Minnesota 7th District (MN-07)?
USAspending.gov lists $934,789,204.26 in Department of Agriculture obligations across 54,952 awards with place of performance in Minnesota 7th District (MN-07). Agency 012 × MN-07 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Minnesota’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 14.8% of the district’s published total ($6,334,473,457.07). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $17,011.01, a ratio of those two facts only.
Does $934,789,204.26 include every USDA program in MN-07?
The packet publishes one awarding-agency rollup. The packet does not split USDA programs or contract versus assistance instruments. $934,789,204.26 is the combined obligation sum for agency 012 inside MN-07 coding. This page will not invent a program pie or name contractors. Open Department of Agriculture and Minnesota 7th District to inspect parent tables. 54,952 remains an action count, not a program count.
Is $934,789,204.26 cash already paid in Minnesota 7th District (MN-07)?
No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $934,789,204.26 as checks already cleared in Minnesota 7th District (MN-07) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 54,952 awards. Prefer the live district and agency hubs if the tables moved.
Why is the implied average $17,011.01 not a typical award?
The average is $934,789,204.26 divided by 54,952 awards, about $17,011.01. Thick files pull the mean down; thin files pull it up. Neither case publishes a typical instrument. Modifications add rows. Recipients are unpublished. Use the ratio only as a concentration statistic.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.