Skip to main content
← All data ties

Department of Commerce obligations in South Dakota

USAspending.gov records $321,685,105.25 obligated by Department of Commerce where the place of performance is South Dakota. The awarding-agency code is 013, and the award count is 82. About $3,922,989.09 per award is $321,685,105.25 divided by 82 — not a typical NOAA, census, or economic-development award.

Key figures

  • USAspending cell: Commerce × South Dakota = $321,685,105.25.
  • 82 records, about $3,922,989.09 each as a mean.
  • Outlays and fiscal-year splits are unpublished here.
  • Black Hills folklore is a reader landmark set, not a subtotal.
  • No contractor names in this packet; geography is statewide South Dakota.

USAspending's Department of Commerce × South Dakota aggregate

The relationship is mechanical. USAspending.gov stores an awarding-agency code and a place-of-performance state. This slug keeps rows where those two keys are 013 and SD. $321,685,105.25 is the obligation sum of that intersection. It is not a verdict on South Dakota policy and not a nationwide Commerce budget.

A modest award list of 82 actions can concentrate dollars in a few instruments or spread them across many modifications. This extract does not say which pattern holds. It publishes $321,685,105.25 and 82 together, without a type split.

Open Department of Commerce in South Dakota for the filtered table, South Dakota federal spending for the next hub, Department of Commerce for the remaining hub, and All spending ties for other pairs.

Why a modest award list still hides mixed instruments

$3,922,989.09 is a ratio of two packet facts. It is not a median, not a mode, and not a typical NOAA, census, or economic-development award. A later ingest can move $321,685,105.25 or 82; until then, the published pair is fixed. Prairie, black hills, and missouri river folklore does not change the ratio.

Agency 013 on a different state's overlay is a sibling join, not a remainder that must add to a national Commerce budget on this page. South Dakota's $321,685,105.25 cell stands alone.

Statewide SD, not Sioux Falls alone

A SD place-of-performance tag is not a promise that every dollar stayed inside Sioux Falls. Work can be planned in South Dakota and performed partly in North Dakota, Minnesota, Iowa, Nebraska, or Wyoming. Those neighbor-coded awards are out of this cell.

Prairie, black hills, and missouri river folklore can be a legitimate research question on another page. Here it is labeled folklore because the packet has no county, city, or congressional-district column.

Obligation unit, not outlay unit

Keep the obligation word in every reuse of $321,685,105.25. South Dakota federal spending and Department of Commerce use the same unit on their own filters. Mixing units across hubs produces a false statewide cash story.

If two pages disagree, prefer the overlay table over remembered round numbers. This prose is a reading of one extract, not a second dataset.

Campaign-finance tables stay off this page

Do not claim that donations paid for $321,685,105.25 in South Dakota. The source is USAspending.gov award aggregates. FEC tables are out of scope for this join.

No contractor roster belongs in this narrative. The facts list state, agency code, agency name, total obligations, and award count. That is the whole numeric set.

How to cite the Commerce–South Dakota pair

Follow Department of Commerce in South Dakota for the overlay, South Dakota federal spending for statewide context, Department of Commerce for the agency without South Dakota, and All spending ties for sibling joins.

All spending ties is an index of joins, not a hidden total that already includes $321,685,105.25. Department of Commerce in South Dakota remains the place to verify the live rows. Place-of-performance South Dakota is statewide; it does not split Sioux Falls, Rapid City, and Pierre. Neighbor-coded activity in North Dakota, Minnesota, Iowa, Nebraska, or Wyoming stays out even if mail is handled in Sioux Falls. Correlation is not causation. Census, weather, standards, and development folklore can be a legitimate research question on another page. Here it is labeled folklore because the packet has no NAICS, CFDA, or program column. Prairie, black hills, and missouri river folklore is the same kind of reader path: useful for search, unused as math. Agency 013 on a different state's overlay is a sibling join, not a remainder that must add to a national Commerce budget on this page. South Dakota's $321,685,105.25 cell stands alone. Do not subtract it from Department of Commerce and call the difference 'South Dakota versus everywhere else' without a published national total in this packet — there is none. Department of Commerce is the awarding-agency label stored on the South Dakota overlay; the numeric key is 013. Readers who only remember the short name Commerce still need both the state tag and the agency tag before quoting $321,685,105.25. The 82 figure is not a count of unique bureaus or recipients and is not a count of distinct Commerce programs. Modifications can add rows without adding new vendors. That is another reason the mean of about $3,922,989.09 is not a typical NOAA, census, or economic-development award. Black Hills folklore is a reader landmark set, not a subtotal. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. This file copies overlayTarget /states/sd/agencies/013/ and canonicalPath /ties/department-of-commerce-in-south-dakota/ from the packet. It does not add a fiscal year, a contractor, or an FEC dollar. If the live overlay later disagrees with $321,685,105.25 or 82, trust the table and treat this prose as dated to the extract. Until then, the reusable facts are $321,685,105.25, 82 awards, agency 013, Department of Commerce, South Dakota (SD), and the obligation unit.

Questions

What is the Commerce obligation total for South Dakota?
USAspending.gov records $321,685,105.25 in obligations for awarding agency 013 (Department of Commerce) with South Dakota place of performance, covering 82 awards. That is an obligation total, not an outlay total, and not Department of Commerce's nationwide budget. The pair is a join, not a ranking.
Does the South Dakota Commerce extract name bureaus as recipients?
The extract lists 82 award actions totaling $321,685,105.25. Average obligation per award is about $3,922,989.09, a ratio of two packet facts, not a typical NOAA, census, or economic-development award. Unique bureaus or recipients are not published here. Original filings remain on the source sites.
Are North Dakota or Nebraska Commerce awards included?
No. $321,685,105.25 and 82 awards are statewide South Dakota place of performance. This packet does not split Sioux Falls, Rapid City, and Pierre. Awards coded to North Dakota, Minnesota, Iowa, Nebraska, or Wyoming are outside this cell even if mail is handled in Sioux Falls. The geography key remains SD.
How do I open the South Dakota overlay for Commerce agency 013?
Department of Commerce in South Dakota is the overlay. South Dakota federal spending shows all agencies in the state. Department of Commerce shows agency 013 without a state filter. All spending ties lists other pairs. Original filings remain on the source sites.

USAspending.gov aggregate of federal obligations by state and awarding agency. Obligations are not outlays.