Skip to main content
← All data ties

Department of Commerce in Wisconsin 2nd District (WI-02)

USAspending.gov records $1,234,423,186.61 in Department of Commerce obligations with place of performance in Wisconsin 2nd District (WI-02). That awarding-agency 013 cell is 1.9% of the district's $63,550,392,256.71 published book—a thin slice of a very large district total. The join lists 72 award records. This page reports the pair, not a ranking of Wisconsin districts.

Key figures

  • USAspending records $1,234,423,186.61 in Commerce obligations in WI-02 (agency 013).
  • That cell is only 1.9% of the district's $63,550,392,256.71 book.
  • 72 award records are not a unique-vendor census.
  • The total is commitments, not outlays. FEC donations do not fund this cell.

Commerce is a small slice of WI-02's book

Agency 013 and Wisconsin 2nd District (WI-02) meet in one place-of-performance cell. $1,234,423,186.61 is the obligation sum tagged to that pair. It is not the district's full $63,550,392,256.71 book, not every Commerce dollar in Wisconsin, and not an outlay. The Wisconsin 2nd District hub still lists other awarding agencies that dwarf this cell; the Department of Commerce hub still lists other districts.

1.9% of $63,550,392,256.71 is still an eleven-figure Commerce cell, not a trivial remainder in absolute dollars. It is also not proof that Commerce dominates WI-02. 72 rows are not 72 named labs or manufacturers. Correlation with local tech or manufacturing news is not causation.

WI-02's large district book versus agency 013

The district parent is $63,550,392,256.71. Department of Commerce occupies 1.9% of that book in this extract. Other awarding agencies fill the rest. Adding those rows into $1,234,423,186.61 would overstate the Commerce join. The Wisconsin 2nd District page at /districts/WI-02/ is the parent without an agency-013 filter.

Department of Commerce at /agencies/013/ drops the WI-02 filter. Wisconsin federal spending at /states/wi/ drops the district cut. All spending ties at /ties/ indexes other pairs. Do not treat $1,234,423,186.61 as statewide Commerce obligations or as the district's headline agency.

72 records stay on the Commerce cell

72 is the join award-record count, not unique vendors. Dividing $1,234,423,186.61 by 72 is not a published typical award. Named recipients remain unpublished. Keep the row count on agency 013 × WI-02 rather than stretching it into a company list.

What Commerce in WI-02 omits

No outlays, no bureau split, no named primes, no FEC overlay. Campaign donations do not fund these USAspending obligations. Place of performance is a geography tag, not proof that a Commerce bureau sits in WI-02. Keep agency 013 and Wisconsin 2nd District on the same citation as $1,234,423,186.61.

Citing Commerce in Wisconsin 2nd District

Name Department of Commerce (agency 013), Wisconsin 2nd District (WI-02), $1,234,423,186.61 in obligations, and 72 award records on USAspending.gov. Quote /districts/WI-02/ for the much larger district book and /agencies/013/ for agency 013 without a district filter.

Reuse $1,234,423,186.61 only as Department of Commerce obligations with place of performance in WI-02. Filings remain on USAspending.gov. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset. Obligations of $1,234,423,186.61 are not outlays. Keep Department of Commerce (agency 013) and Wisconsin 2nd District (WI-02) together when citing $1,234,423,186.61. The 72 award-record count is the join field, not a unique-vendor census. Obligations of $1,234,423,186.61 are not outlays. Original filings remain on USAspending.gov. Do not add the district parent of $63,550,392,256.71 into this agency-013 cell. Campaign-finance tables do not fund these USAspending obligations. Place of performance in WI-02 is a geography tag, not a contractor roster. 1.9% is the published share of $63,550,392,256.71 tagged to Department of Commerce in this extract. Other awarding agencies on the Wisconsin 2nd District hub sit outside $1,234,423,186.61. Reuse the figure only as the 013 × WI-02 obligation join. Later USAspending ingests can restate $1,234,423,186.61. Cite the pair as commitments, not as checks already cleared in Wisconsin. The All spending ties index holds other keys. The join remains Department of Commerce (agency 013) with place of performance in Wisconsin 2nd District (WI-02). $1,234,423,186.61 is the obligation total; 72 is the award-record count; $63,550,392,256.71 is the district parent. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays. The join remains Department of Commerce (agency 013) with place of performance in Wisconsin 2nd District (WI-02). $1,234,423,186.61 is the obligation total; 72 is the award-record count; $63,550,392,256.71 is the district parent. USAspending.gov is the source. Obligations are not outlays.

Questions

How much did Commerce obligate in Wisconsin 2nd District?
USAspending.gov shows $1,234,423,186.61 in Department of Commerce obligations with place of performance in Wisconsin 2nd District (WI-02). The sum is a commitment total, not outlays and not the district's $63,550,392,256.71 book. Other agencies in WI-02 sit outside this join.
Do 72 awards mean 72 Commerce contractors in WI-02?
No. 72 is the join award-record count, not unique vendors. The packet names no contractors. Keep agency 013 and WI-02 in the citation. Commerce is 1.9% of the district book, not the district's full catalog. 72 is the join award-record count, not a unique-recipient census.
Does Commerce dominate Wisconsin 2nd District spending?
No. Agency 013 is 1.9% of the district's $63,550,392,256.71 published book. The Wisconsin 2nd District hub lists other awarding agencies that sit outside $1,234,423,186.61. Do not treat this cell as the district headline.
Did FEC donations fund these Commerce awards?
No. $1,234,423,186.61 is a USAspending obligation aggregate. FEC contribution tables are a different dataset and do not fund these awards. Outlays are unpublished. Cite agency 013 plus Wisconsin 2nd District (WI-02). USAspending.gov remains the source for agency 013 in WI-02.

USAspending.gov congressional district place-of-performance joined to awarding agency. District 90/98 (multi/non-voting placeholders) are omitted. Obligations are not outlays.